Hi all,
This is where we wait for the latest AMD graphics card which AMD will surely release in a timely manner and will definitely blow all of our minds, no questions asked, 100% guaranteed, no chance it'll fail, just you wait.
Last time: The latest:
videocardz.com
videocardz.com
gamersnexus.net
pcper.com
videocardz.com
videocardz.com
gamersnexus.net
videocardz.com
pcper.com
can you post that black with red leds render? it looked really good
RTG will be sold off for pennies on the dollar once Volta releases and BTFOs Rajeet once and for all.
Here ya go.
this thing is pure sex, hope it looks like this
thanks user
the wait is getting to me, summer is dead season and I want to replay a few games
but I wanted to do that with new videocard not to worry about fps drops
can't buy 1080 or 1070 would be a waste with current prices, also lack of cards in the stores
390 runs 1440p somewhat decently, but damn
Why wouldn't you just buy a 1080 TI?
Whats the esimated hashrate of the vega cards?
This question btfo all amd. 1080 even
Who's hoping AMD drops out of the consumer GPU market?
I personally can't wait.
Freesync monitor
Price/performance
Not wanting to deal with nvidia control panel.
Not wanting to deal with g sync
Not wanting to deal with shitty nvidia software and drivers.
Thats why I'm getting Vega.
Xth for sold out because of miners in the first hour
the FE performs like a turn on mining, doubt RX will be any better in that regard
its 20% or 30% faster than a FuryX results.
Please don't buy.
Prices are bad enough.
Then what?
1160 for only 1160$
Stupid gaymoar GPUs are ridiculously expensive already due to the eth mining boom. You wouldn't want that dirty Jew tricks company holding a monopoly on top of that.
>1160 for only 1160$
That's exactly what I want.
I don't just mean DaggerHashimoto, I mean all hashrates.
If I just wanted to mine etherium, I wouldnt be asking this question. Still going to preorder though.
This might seem like a stupid question, but why would you want the prices to skyrocket even outside of the mining crazes?
Vega is DOA
It wasn't obvious? Because I want these gaymen niggers to not play games because the hardware is so overpriced, the tears will be delicious.
We need another 5 years of Bulldozer on the GPU front, with Intel prices(or worse) to match.
Actually, that's a good point. Game companies would have to optimize their code again or go bust due to fewer people that could afford 300w bitchin fast 3d graphics cards.
>wanting overpriced GPUs because of hate towards gamers
Why? Who hurt you?
These Sup Forums spillover apes are shitting up the board and pretty much any graphic related forum.
So yeah, they hurt me, they make my free time less enjoyable.
iGPUs are good enough for daily use. Only gaymers are being butthurt and that's always nice to see.
>iGPUs are good enough for daily use
>Sup Forums boogyman
I'd like a non-bait answer, please.
>61286071
that Nvidia troll does this every day the stupid the poorfag hasn't bough a GPU in years
he just wants it too expenive so that he can keep up with us.
Honestly just ignore dumbasses like this.
or you know, gaming companies simply stop developing for pc and you'd have to play 30fps 900p for all eternity
oh and the funny part on AMD hardware because nobody wants to deal with nvidia bullshit in corporate world
no they aren't, the guy who tested it live got ~33MH/s
Not buying anything from a company that ships spyware drivers with $700 pieces of hardware.
Dog shit on Lyra2REv2, the only algorithm that matters.
Looks nice though it's a shame the reference blower sucks.
what is the gpu after vega's successor?
I don't think I will upgrade for the next few years because of miners
Navi. /w4n/
>Sodium Industries
I kek'd
>what is the gpu after vega's successor?
It depends on who's gonna buy AMD once it goes under after Vega RX's upcoming blunder.
>AMD only makes GPUs
3/10 made me reply.
>because nobody wants to deal with nvidia bullshit in corporate world
Dumb fuck, the consoles use AMD because they want an x86 APU and only AMD can do that. Intel can't into GPUs and Nvidia doesn't have an x86 license.
Fucking Intel fucking hates dealing with nVidia. They are fucking cunts.
I am going to crossfire Vega on an i9 7900x rig.
>Intel says
So now Intel is good because it fits your anti-Nvidia AMDrone bias?
>Shit GPU and shit CPU
You got it backwards, you SLi 1080Tis on a Threadripper.
Lmao theres gpu in console not apu kek
No, even fucking Intel, the kikes themselves, hate dealing with nvidia.
Don't kid yourself. The only reason anyone buys AMD is because they're poor.
You still here buddy? Its not looking good for you.
Hey that's me
That was fast
Sup Forums is not a very large board and these threads are in 90% cases always found by filter
Not an argument.
I gave up, caved in, and ponied up for huang's wang again.
Nvidia is currently top dog for 4K 60.
>60Hz
cuck
iGPUs or even low end (GT 1030) are more than enough.
>Sup Forums boogyman
You don't need to believe in crossboarding scum for them to shit up the board. Personally I want to see AMD back out of the consumer AIB space alltogether and leave gaymurs to get cucked by leather jacket man for all eternity.
>muh big die pascal
Kill yourself, shill.
This. AMD drivers don't have telemetry shit and other bullshit. Cards don't get gimped when new ones come out. Freesync is miles cheaper than gsync.
honestly after 2+ years waiting for a 290 sucessor i just gave up and got a 390x, now amd releasea fury x with 8gb of vram and clock for clock its the same as the new "vega"
give me a fucking break, im done, gonna get a 1080 used
Fuck disgusting TN panels, I hate them with a passion.
I'll get into 144Hz once 4K OLED becomes a thing and GPUs are powerful enough to drive them.
Me too, I'm waiting until DP has single cable support for 4k@120Hz (uncompressed) and GPUs have the I/O for it, I'll buy when a single GPU that can do an average 120Hz on 4k
Before that, I'm sticking to my mobile GPU and catching up on my backlog games with an emulator
>I'll get into 144Hz once 4K OLED becomes a thing and GPUs are powerful enough to drive them.
not this decade
gpu dev has stalled this gen
1080ti = bigger oc'd maxwell 980ti and still cant handle 4k
vega rx = fury x oc with 8gb of vram or 16gb or whatever meme amount, still cant into 1600p barely
I have jewvidya and I'm waiting for Vega to get off this jewish piece of shit. Kill yourself you disgusting shill. And have fun with your forced telemetry built into driver.
ayymy shill here
the vega rx can barely match the fucking 1070 ffs
RX Vega is not even out yet.
I actually don't give a fuck. I will gladly take under performing GPU over israeli data miner.
Reminder to report shitposters.
>wanting less compitition in any product
>still defending iGPUs as a main source of displaying desktops
You know how I know you are a cuck?
You know how I know you are a bait?
Yes, I want less competition soley to spite the consumers in said market. Said consumers are also braindead retards who kept buying NVidya even when they were slinging hot trash like Thermi, so they deserve to be fleeced.
Also, I said low-end GPUs are more than enough.
>Runs cooler and faster than a 1080 with potato drivers
RX Vega is going to match or even surpass a 1080TI on non-Gameworks games.
Wait for rx. Wait for navi. Wait for drivers. Wait for everything. Never deliver. The rtg motto
>I actively want the only competition in x86 to fail despite being several times smaller than their competitors
Even then not a total loss, at least back light bleed will be completely annihilated and we will be back were we started granted burn in is resolved.
For older games should be able to run high frame rates at 4K just fine, and watching videos shot at 24fps at 144Hz refresh rate without any post processing should look smoother since it is a direct multiple.
>wanting to spite the invisible hand
Just like the "invisible (black) cock" that is fucking your wife. and if you think that the death of compitition doesnt fuck you over too as an iGPU user, you are a limp dick retard, just like a true cuckold.
And to your other point, what If I wanted to watch 4k content? or hell, 1080p? Cause I can tell you from first hand experience, an iGPU does not rise to the occasion, just like you.
>I infer made up realities of other posters because I huffed too much street poo
>or hell, 1080p? Cause I can tell you from first hand experience, an iGPU does not rise to the occasion, just like you.
Kek. You're one hell of a retard if you can't even get 1080p content to work. You don't need a $500 GPU to watch your tranny porn.
@61288650
>black cock
@61288658
>street poo
Nothing worth listening to here.
then you are a dickhead.
They could still use an external NVidia gpu, except that both console makers got extremely burned when they did that, due to NVidia hoarding their patents like kikes.
Nintendo is about to learn this too. Don't expect the Switch successor to be backwards compatible like all their other consoles were.
...
How expensive will the vega be when it comes out?
And why do these threads exist? Its just going to be a new next gen card isnt it? Whats the big deal this time?
I'm building a new rig, should I wait for it to come out or just settle for an nvidea 1050 since everything else is so expensive thanks to crypto fags
We already know it's going to preform at at least 1080 levels and will probably undercut it by 100 bucks.
Solely for that and >muh freesync
its worth the wait.
Any thing in top of that is just extra. Also, i'd rather wait 3 weeks and buy a gpu that gets at least a couple of years of support rather than buy an 1080 and get fucked over in a couple of months when Nvidia drops support or sabotages drivers in favor for their next gen cards. People who bought the 980ti where hella screwed when Nvidia launched the 10x0 line.
Because of the hbm memory and die size don't expect cheap cards. If anything it will be fury prices
Switch can't play Wii U games
BC is already dead
As far we know now Vega RX will launch with three cards costing 399, 499 and 599 respectively.
Vega RX is Vega 10 which is the big dick line-up from AMD, Navi which is Vega 11 releases further up 2017.
If you're not inclined to spending more than 300 bucks on a gpu just buy the 1050, it'll run everything fine in 1080p. Look around for an RX 570 first, see if you can snag one on the cheap, but don't count on it.
youtube.com
Gas yourself nigger
>50% larger die than the 1080
>much higher power consumption even with HBM2
>might not even beat it when both are oc'd
>it's a fucking year later
AMD has really outdone themselves this time around
Nvidia are cunts to everyone they deal with - they fucked sony on the PS3 and will (more than likely) never get another console deal from them again. In fact all that bad blood is why Nvidia declared that they didn't want the console contract ("b-b-aka, its n-n-not like I wanted it anyway") right after sony went public with the tech specs of the ps4. MS is now buddying up to AMD due to ryzen (also consider of the 3 consoles MS have released 2 of them have had AMD/ATi gpus in them).
Nvidia is making a shitton of selling consumer gpu's and much more than they would from low margin gpu sales in consoles.
If you think they are the least bothered you are delusional
Remember where they've come from. If they make that same leap again within the next couple years they'll be pushing far ahead of NVIDIA. This is still very good for AMD, even if not great for the market nor timing.
that's not how consistent, reliable business is built
read up on 3dfx
they were selling shitton of consumer gpu and king of the hill for a while
nvidia doing the same thing - proprietary apis, pissing people off with patent trolls, price gauging
they gone bonkers only recently and already slowly losing share they gained
> If they make that same leap again within the next couple years they'll be pushing far ahead of NVIDIA
How fucking delusional do you have to be to believe this.
Latest benchmark leaks where probably non-oc, and the higher power draw should only bother poorfags right?
Besides, spending 700+ dollar on a 1080 or ti when Volta is just around the corner is just dumb garnering that in a few months you could've bought Volta for the same price. AMDfags hate on Nvidia for fucking over consumers rightly so.
>that's not how consistent, reliable business is built
Nvidia's market share tends to disagree with you
>inb4 it's shrinking
It is, due to some good low-mid level gpu's from AMD, but they still hold the vast majority of the market
>Latest benchmark leaks where probably non-oc
Wrong
youtube.com
>in a few months you could've bought Volta for the same price
Volta isn't a few months away and Pascal cards have been on the market for almost a year now
They did with Ryzen curb stomping Intel, don't really see how they couldn't do the same with Nvidia.
Dialectics of lead and all
again, 3dfx was 80% of the market and died overnight
marketshare is meaningless in a market that changes generations every 1.5 years
>They did with Ryzen curb stomping Intel
Ryzen was a good comeback, but curb stomping Intel, come on dude, do you really believe this?
Have you seen the video?
He's literally explaining to us how the benchmarks appear to not show them testing OC capabilities.
Marketshare only changes if there is a good reason for it, what you are describing is not something why marketshare would change over night
I have, have you?
He is literally saying the top results are most likely oc'd results