What went wrong?

What went wrong?

Other urls found in this thread:

arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/06/intel-fires-warning-shots-at-microsoft-claims-x86-emulation-is-a-patent-minefield/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Lack of competition

...

CEO that is worse than fucking Ruinz.
Also their 10nm node is a total failure.

One guy decide to crash the party

Laziness, waste of money and jewry

Got lazy.

Everything

They couldn't compete with government funded lithiography research.

it's like pottery

>what went wrong?

They didn't cooperate with the free software community as much as we would've liked.
They added shady hardware, that cannot be turned off, in their chipsets.
I don't hate companies, I hate shit moves and proprietary software/hardware design.
Now AMD (which does bad stuff too) has gotten into the mix, and gaymer kids that only care about muh FPS will fall right into their jaws.

arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/06/intel-fires-warning-shots-at-microsoft-claims-x86-emulation-is-a-patent-minefield/
Being a whiny kek instead of innovating

>NUMA IS BAD GOYS
>AMD WITH ITS NUMA IS THE DEVIL, STAY AWAY
>p-pls enable numa for best performance g-goys

THEY LITERALLY TELL YOU
TO PARTITION SKL-SP
THE SAME WAY
AMD DOES NUMA IN EPYC
4 FUCKING NODES
OH THE IRONY

It's their turn to run with a shitty architecture.

Oh god Intel you're killing yourself

>arm versions of gahnoo+linux had software i386 emulation (qemu for example) since forever. Assuming a fat enough ARM cpu+ enough ram you could run windows inside a vm and run x86 windows programs
>lol who cares
>windows tries to do that
>STOP RIGHT THERE CRIMINAL SCUM

Rest in piss.

We take all competitors seriously, and while AMD is trying to re-enter the server market segment, Intel continues to deliver 20-plus years of uninterrupted data center innovations while maintaining broad ecosystem investments. Our Xeon CPU architecture is proven and battle tested, delivering outstanding performance on a wide range of workloads and specifically designed to maximize data center performance, capabilities, reliability, and manageability. With our next-generation Xeon Scalable processors, we expect to continue offering the highest core and system performance versus AMD. AMD’s approach of stitching together 4 desktop die in a processor is expected to lead to inconsistent performance and other deployment complexities in the data center.

...

Literally came here to say that.
First post, best post.

So somehow all this is again AMD's fault?

Thinking that their fab tech would overcoming any difficulties in making massive monolith dies and losing their shit over GPGPU eating up HPC market by forcing AVX down their entire CPU line-up.