This does not bode well for Intel.
This does not bode well for Intel
you get worse value for money (as in $ per core) on the cut down model
what did AyyMD mean by this?
Buy flagship?
That 12c model is stupid
If you're spending as much as 800 for a cpu, might as well add 200 more for a proper kike ripping experience
Damn, 4Ghz max turbo just like the 1800x? Was not expecting. This thing will rip shit up.
Price is about in line with what I was expecting, but I do hope there will be a step-down 16-core SKU for maybe $850~$900 that I could just OC to the same performance levels.
That's the point i guess.
Maybe they'll drop it to $699 for lulz.
Since it shits on 7900x.
...
CB15
16 core TR - 3100 score
12 core TR - 2400 score
10 core i9 - 2100 score
Yikes
I imagine TR not setting your pc on fire is a pleasant bonus.
YES.
AMADA KELLED INTEL IN ACTION.
>same price
>~50% more performance
>64 vs 44 pci-e lanes
>not a house fire
>no jews inside
Rest in piss
...
twitter.com
>Update: Threadripper 1950X and 1920X confirmed 180W.
AYYMD HOUSEFIRES
AYYMD HOUSEFIRES EVERYWHERE
Don't worry, that's still far lower than Intel's "140W"
pls buy intel.I work at intel
Good thing that AMD is using seperate, soldered dies and a fuckhueg headspreader, so cooling shouldn't be an issue. Unlike a certian other HEDT CPU which has glue under the hood and is fucking impossible to cool properly.
R3 under $100?
It's probably going to compete with the i3, so the same price or lower than those
100C stock on water is perfectly normal, goy.
I don't understand why we don't have prices when it's coming out sooner than threadripper.
AYYMD HOUSEFIRES INEFFICIENT AS FUCK
Intel 18 cores 36 thread 165W
Probably undecided yet, Intel is doing some shekelling with that great perf/price Pentium at the moment so the prices might change for Ryzen 3
>"""""""""""""""""""""165watts"""""""""""""""""""""
That 18 core loses to the 16 core TR, lol. Intel would have to go way over 165 watts to win.
Is anyone else confused by how many chips Intel has released at once? I have no fucking idea what most of these chips are, I usually have to look them up because the model numbers make no sense and don't seem to correspond to anything.
>56
>justfragmentmyshitup.jpg
...
>filename
top kek
thanks user for making me laugh
They should use the CPU profits to sell Vega for cost and bury Nvidia
>two levels of gold
why not bronze, silver, gold, platinum, diamond?
were they afraid to copy Starcraft ladder ranking?
>how to keep track of the jews on the concentration camp
this will melt the ice caps
This.
You are pretty funny
reminder to report shitposters
Now imagine if Nvidia did this and AMD went out of business, wouldn't that be anti-competitive business practices? I couldn't see the U.S. government looking away from this if Nvidia indeed did go out of business, but I as well as you do, know that their performance is crowned king.
twitter.com
>Update: Threadripper 1950X and 1920X confirmed 180W.
AYYMD HOUSEFIRES
>Not Mithril, Adamantite, Rune, and Dragon
Finally someone appreciates my Jew posting!
Delid dis
It's soldered.
HAHAHAHAH
...
>EPYC actually consumes less power than it's advertised TDP
Wot.
That's because AMD's processors actually use a few % of power for computing and the rest to generate heat. Unlike Intel's processors which use over 100% of power and somehow transform it into heat. You have to give props to Intel's engineers though.
just like an electric oven
I was hoping for something cheaper than $800, I really want the lanes but not the cores. Dumping $800 for a CPU is still a bit much for me, I would've loved something around $600.
How is it anti-competitive? companies have even sold products at a lose without issue.
I was hoping as well when I saw an EPYC 16core at $650. Oh well, can't win them all. I guess I'm going 1700 after all and later go full retard with Zen2.
Maybe they'll price drop the 12 core. Right now it seems a bit expensive. They dropped prices on the R7 lineup already.
This won't make video games any faster. Waste of money
There are 3 SKUs below that $800 chip, don't worry.
Not even a (You) for (You).
@61355481 (You)
I'm waiting for AMD to release their 32 core 64 thread version.
Intel fanboys will have lost everything by that point.
no, there aren't
>I'm waiting for AMD to release their 32 core 64 thread version.
7551P?
not coming for threadripper's platform, this is only at enterprise grade
>sub $100 for the R3 line
Rip i3
Intel's 18core is fucked, it's either going to be a fucking nuclear bomb, or they'll have to under clock it so hard, or both
Sauce?
>Gov should tell companies how to price they're products
fuck off
look at the fucking OP R3 1200 most likely be sub 100.
I did well to hold off buying a new CPU. I is smart.
R5 is already cheap as i3
gratz
I'm thinking $120/$140 myself.
maybe for the 1300 model.
I am betting on sub 100 for the lowest tier cpu.
1400 is 160 which is too close
1200 going to compete with g4560
I probably won't buy anything yet, I'm looking for something with more lanes so I guess it's back to waiting since Kaby Lake X is retarded and expensive, Threadripper is expensive too.
I hope so, but it's probably going to be a while until that happens. It's not really bad value at all compared to the disgusting shit Intel is pulling, but it's still a pretty large sum for a CPU. I can afford it but it's above my comfort zone.
waiting on Zen+
will be the best CPU to buy, with 14nm+ perfected
while my FX-6350 serves me well
Thank You AMD
user, I think they're going straight to 7nm.
there won't be a zen+ only the notebook APUs will come in 14nm+ it seems
Thx anons, ordering 1700 now then
...
>999 burgers
I prefer to buy professional gadgets. Such as MacBook you know. The real technology.
hold up I just saw it somewhere for 260
I just saw this sucker on sale too. Think I'm gonna buy it even though I shouldn't and get the rest of my build in another month or two.
i think its the same model
I'm from Canuck land ;(
Holy shit
>58 SKUs isn't confusing at all to customers
why are you implying that he implied that?
Drive down border and price match at local store?
>what are 10c/20t chips
Why are you implying that I implied that he implied that?
They don't exist.
because you implied that
Was implying Intel think that but never mind.
The only thing that counts for everyone who doesn't do rendering or other weird shit is still single core performance. 4 cores are more than enough.
now you're making sense, thanks for the clearup
so?
price...?
not revealed yet
For Ryzen3? I wish i knew.
Now everyone is switching to 6-8 core AMD or 6 core mainstream intel CPU's, that is going to change dramatically in the near future.