>JUST WAIT
>Starting at $799
RIP AMD, you will be missed.
>JUST WAIT
>Starting at $799
RIP AMD, you will be missed.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
tomshardware.com
reddit.com
archive.is
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Not bad actually for under $2000. This is actually something I would consider paying more for if necessary.
Sup Forums - AMD
Prosumers will pay out the ass for this shit.
Clocks are still bellow an i9 tho so anything that isn't massively parallel will suffer.
mainboard starting at 500
what's the point
>buy 12/16 core cpus
>not running heavy threaded workloads
>Buying HEDT for any reason besides massively parallel processing
Also it would only be about 18% faster single core. With 41% worse multicore. For the same price.
>Wait for thread ripper
Said no one ever. Also compared to Intel'$ equivalent offerings is a pretty good option.
yeah it's winter anyway, so a cozy burning intel would be much better for just a hundred bucks more
Are these even mean for average consumer usage? Going by that pricing, I would expect them to be used for heavy duty work.
Any one buying these for gaming is a retard. These are computation monsters that are meant for srs biznis or at least for users who know that they do in fact need all these cores.
If you're struggling to figure out what you need that many cores for, you don't need it.
But Sup Forums told me to wait for this instead of Ryzen
Are you telling me I waited for fucking nothing again?
I have not seen a single person here say "Wait for TR" unless they were already looking at getting an 8 core CPU and weren't sure if they needed more or not.
Threadripper's product placement is competing with the i9 line.
Anybody who uses an i9 for gaming is a retard.
Anybody who uses Threadripper for gaming is a retard.
Threadripper beats out Intel at workstation tasks which can utilize many cores in parallel because of its price/performance.
>Anyone who uses AMD is retarded
FTFY
This is probably bait but it's a server CPU that competes with $2000 CPUs and it absolutely shits on them.
Fuck off Intel shill.
Sup Forums - #TeamRed
If you are building for gaming either deal with the housefire 7700k, buy 6700k, or wait for 7nm Ryzen next year.
...
you can tell every time when aussie and amerifats brand whores wake up
Let's play "spot the bait thread OP's samefaggotry!"
>wait
Last time I listened to an AMD employee
Hi Brian
...
>25 posts 14 IPs
OP sure does love samefagging his bait thread.
>AMD jew isn't selling their best workstation CPUs for under $500
I bet they moved to Israel this year.
Finally 2014 performance for 20% less.
t-thx AMD
It's a compelling product for a good price.
But like Epyc, what the fuck is up with the name? I mean they understand people will buy trying to explain to their tech illiterate bosses that their company needs to buy a bunch of thread rippers and epyc processors?
Plz show me that $800 2014 CPU that can hit 3k in cinebench.
....so jewish names like Silver, Gold, and Platinum isn't cringe also?
It's clear as day that they were originally intended to compete in the gaymen market. They even started that way with Ryzen, trying to tell people they could finally stream DotA 2 on Twitch using fudged benchmarks.
Suggestions?
No one told you to wait.
Yup Ryzen is a complete failure at streaming while gaming .. retard. youtube.com
You have negative brain cell count if you can't see Zen was designed as a low power efficient scaleable server architecture first.
No, they sound much more professional.
As does ceon i7, or i9.
They should just name the a bunch of random numbers.
Ryzen for gaming sure. R5 is even compelling. But threadripper and epyc where never once considered to be for gaming you giant fucking mongoloid. I wish gaymers would fuck off Sup Forums with their illusion that everything is for them. I'm sorry if I'm being harsh for you just not understanding server or workstation processors (epyc) or super high core count processors (threadripper)vs high clocked lower core gaming parts. But this sheer ignorance gets annoying as fuck. AMD never intended to make a 16core 32 thread gaming cpu. If that doesn't seem obvious to you, stick to Sup Forums
Literally anything else.
Random numbers would work, words that have no real meaning etc. Nothing wrong with ryzen, threadripper isn't as bad as epyc though i admit.
how much are comparable i9s again?
$1000 for the 10 core that gets BTFO. $2000 for the yet to be released 18 core which will also lose, unless Intel makes it have a 200 watt TDP.
What clockd can you reach on the 10 core i9?
> 16c/32t
> $1000
literally two 1800X glued toghether, how can Intel even compete?
Depends on the silicon lottery. And your ability to deal with nuclear holocaust right inside your socket.
Depends. You got one of these handy? tomshardware.com
Doesn't seem like a bad deal compared to intels i9 offerings, I'm tempted to get the 12 core variant, but will probably stick to ryzen for the moment.
Should have been $600 tops
12/16 cores for 799 and 999 one from intel is like 2000
They could use their 8 core lcc dies linked with an OCed qpi, I wonder why they don't do it.
QPI is not intended for in-package communication.
What point are you tying to make?
It's a shitty troll bait thread.
If you're running single core workloads then why the fuck aren't you buying a 7700K or that cheap ass Pentium you fucking retard?
By all accounts, it's going to rip an $800 intel CPU to shit.
The i9 will also suffer if something is not massively parallel. These processors are not meant for Sup Forums. The 16 core Zen rekts every intel chip. There is nothing faster on the market.
>1950X
>It's double the 1800X price
>It has double the cores and ram
Literally nothing wrong.
>1920X
>triple the price of the 1600X
Ok, that's gay. They should slash the price to $500~570
>They should slash the price to $500~570
That's how much 1800X costs, bro. At most I can see the price going down by $100.
Reminder to report shitposters.
> $500 for a 12 core
but that's the 1800X user
the 1800x is right now almost below $400, they reduced the prices some months back to account for the TR launch
>shitposters
report anyone who states an ugly truth about amd cpus? I'm not on the payroll poojeet.
?
>I already know what garbage game you're trying to claim doesn't run well on Ryzen
Yeah everyone knows about those garbage games that are currently topping steam charts.
>You're a sad little lump of shit.
Being this mad that your "favorite" manufacturer/employer isn't good at something. Why do you care THIS much again?
>inb4 doom, and aots ryzen benchmarks
You're not funny.
if you want to burn down your fucking house
>linking reddit
>faggot posts plebbit post that can't be confirmed.
At the very least archive that cancer, or just stay there.
>archive.is
This is what I hated most when shopping for a gaming cpu, and asking about how it performs on certain titles. It's always a forum post that showed nothing, or best case scenario for the game with the lowest possible settings away from any actual gameplay (like every arma 3 ryzen benchmarks).
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
There was apparently a patch at some point that fixed things up.
>12 cores for cheaper than or 16 cores for the same price as the competing 10-core
>RIP AMD
???
These are server CPUs you autist.
The 7900x is a disaster priced at $1,000
That 12 core threadripper will beat it by a little but not run hotter than the sun.
I propose KikeRipper and Glued-Together-Yet-You-Still-BTFO
No fucking shit.
Worth it.
You need to take your anti-semitic memes back to Sup Forums
...
>starting at $799
>1920X
No 10 core CPU????????
You can't make 10core CPU.
CCX is always power of two.
>anti-semitic
>memes
The CCXs probably need to be symmetrical in threadripper too, so the amount of cores is always a multiple of 4.
le dumb cunt doesn't realise these are server parts and that the mainstream cpus are labeled under the ryzen 5 and 7 name
Server parts are EPYC.
Threadripper is HEDT.
Ryzen 1600?????
Oh man
AMD pls reles 20 Core CPU
1600 is 3+3.
Not him but why couldn't it be 3+3+3+3 then?
Jw
> tfw no $70 3-core/6-thread R3
It's 12 cores then.
Fuck I'm retarded i thought we were talking about 12 cores not the 10
Im an asshole
You want the times of tricore Athlons back?
Hell yes, some Apple's chips are 3-core and they kick ass.
Xenon in xbawks360 was also a tricore.
>SO MANY CORE
>50 CORE CPU
>2% USAGE BECAUSE GAME STILL ONLY USE ONE CORE
HEDT is not for you. Neither are games made after 2006, apparently.
People pay over $400 for quadcores all the time
>OP is suggesting $700 is too much for fucking 12.
lmao
literally name a single game that can use more than one core
battlefield n? no.
colladoody 16? no.
wanted? no.
space chess? no.
autism effect? nope.
SEETHING :^)
Go back to Sup Forums. Every single AAA game these days has multiple threads.
Battlefield 1 uses 8. Nearly doubled my performance going from an i5 to i7. Though I wouldn't say it's a good thing considering Battlefront and BF4 both ran way better than BF1 - I think in their quest to optimize for more threads, they forgot that most people are still on 4 cores or less because the game runs like absolute shit despite not improving the graphics very much.
All of them?
Did you even try to launch a game made after 2010 with a single core?
youtube.com
Here is handy video.
>1920X and 1950X sell like hotcakes compared to the i9-7900X
>12+ core Skylake Xs launches
>1910X and 1940X launches with lower core frequencies for $100 less
kek
kek, Intel's highest end 12 core is $2k read TWO THOUSAND AMERICAN SHEKELS, I can't even imagine how expensive their mutilated Xeon 18 core will be. Big dies is not the answer, smaller dies glued together is better for everyone.
They will more than likely just lower prices on the 12 core. It looks like it could drop $100 easily.