16 cores

>16 cores
>pisses all over 7900X in performance
>as big as a SATA SSD so people know it's the real deal
>only $999

Press S to spit on Intel's grave.

S

Other urls found in this thread:

cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i9-7920X-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X/m278103vs3916
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Delete this thread please.

I am actually quite impressed with how big the thing is.
Also I think the name threadripper is really cool.

Still staying with Intel of course, I like to be cucked.

>tfw forever an Intel cuck

S

G L U E D T O G E T H E R
L
U
E

C U M T I M
U
M

DELET.

If its so good, how come apple uses intel and not this?
AMD btfo

In the next gen apple will use custom amd apus.

Ryzen needs to get the fuck in laptops already. Their perf/watt kicks the shit out of Intel's. Plus, look at that THINN package.

Apple want to make the ultimate throttlemac.

because AMD doesn't support thunderbolt

> only one thousand
Jew antics

Thunderbolt. When the issues are ironed out with implementing it on Ryzen now that Intel has released the rights to it, Apple will switch to AMD.

>If its so good, how come apple uses intel and not this?
>Using what Apple uses and does not use as a metric of what we all should do

Because Apple take several years to change the CPU used on their shit.

S

>delid this thread please
FTFY.

They fucking used PowerPC until 2005 while it was BTFO by 2000

I can't believe that Apple didn't went to Threadripper with their new iMac Pro.
Even underclocked would still kick the ass with a Intel heather-formerly-know-as-processor.

delet that pic

Assbackwards.

Instead of AMD CPU they used Intel CPU
Instead of Nvidia GPU they used AMD GPU

>thunderbolt
I'm a bit skeptical of this
>contracts with Intel
Probably the biggest reason of this. Intel has grabbed Apple by the balls.
That or Tim Cook is the biggest moron in the earth
>AMD reputation as a "cheap and bad alternative" in the processor market could damage Apple brand
Probably this too. AMD still has a bit of bad rep.
Anyways I still can't understand why they didn't go with AMD in the iMac Pro. In Jobs era Apple considered seriously using Llano for the Macbook Air.

S

I'm pro Israel but Intel can go die in a fire. Disgusting fucking abomination of a company. False marketing, bribery to keep AMD out of OEM sales, pathetic trash talking in official press powerpoint slides, avoiding paying anti-competitive multi-billion dollar fines, artificial segmentation, A FUCKING 300 USD X299 RAID KEY!!!!!!!!!!!!, hardware backdoor via Intel AMT/ME and so on.

I spit their graves

no

Macs need a custom kernel to run OS X on AMD. Doable, but they'd rather stay with Intel for now.

>custom kernel
That kernel only contains a simple patch to deal with encryption only. Apple can make that patch in a day or two.
They don't need to rewrite the kernel, no as much as they did when NeXTStep evolved to Mac OS.

Yeah? Well, OK. I don't know, maybe some kexts won't be supported, testing is required. I understand why they don't want to put money into it now.

Probably mostly a issue with contracts with Intel.
That's the most likely explanation.

Darwin is very portable. The biggest issue would be write the drivers for the controllers in the Zen die, but that isn't near as hard as porting to a new processor architecture.

cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i9-7920X-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X/m278103vs3916

How the fuck can amd niggers defend this

>1 user benchmark
Brian stop.

Why are you comparing an unreleased HEDT CPU against a mainstream Ryzen part? Skylake-X would compete against Threadripper my confused friend.

>base clock 2.9GHz
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

AND PEOPLE ARE THINKING THE 18 CORE WON'T BE JUST PIC RELATED WITH TOOTHPASTE

>a E5 v3 barely surpasses a Xeon Pokemón Gold
That's shooting in the feet on purpose.