Fedora or Debian?

Which one is more Sup Forums approved? Fedora or Debian?

Other urls found in this thread:

schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/05/random_number_b.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Debian

Debian

Debian

Debian

Debian. Though, latest release is a joke.

NSA botnet vs distribution for lesbians... Hm...

...

>le nsa botnet meme

it's spread by nsa because they want you to use an insecure distro

the correct question is Debian sid or Fedora 26

the answer is Fedora 26 because stable distro, finished product, comes with all reasonable settings in pace for your security

Not a meme

Debian

>red hat is more hackable than other distros
>nsa is keeping american industry compromised
>nsa enables industrial espionage
>nsa works for china


it is a meme you retard

you must be a moron from some shithole

>redhat testbed
>"stable, finished product"

(You)

>le testbed meme

the only thing it lacks is long term support, otherwise it just ships newer software

they have an actual testbed, like debian sid

then they have alphas/betas

and then a finished product, which is better than any other "stable" distro out there

Implying that having backdoor it's instantly know to everyone else.
Implying it's on plain sight.

Fuck off

China would find and use it

it's unacceptable risk in commercial OSS and no agency would do that, they would rather FOIA for a copy of the entire system

sorry not FOIA, FISA

all these retards that unironically suggest debian because
>muh backdoor
>muh nsa
>muh redhat testbed
will happily defend the most backdoor-esque bug that ever made it into a mainstream distro ever: the debian predictable prng in openssl, purely due to the amateurs developers working on debian and their insistence on messing with every little package

schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/05/random_number_b.html

Debian

Implying it wasn't NSA's jobs
>Inb4 it was a bug!!!
Implying it wasn't intentional bug

>Oh they surely wouldn't do that!
Why then NSA asks Linus to implement backdoor? That would compromise even more distributions.
>Inb4 they didn't!
OK

>2008
Show something from this decade grandpa.

Fedora

>>Inb4 they didn't!
>OK
stop pretending that you know what was asked specifically

and who said that Linus's father is not a Finnish attention whoring lunatic?

Debian

Neither. Both use systemd.

Why do you care what a bunch of immature NEETs and teena/g/ers think, anyways?

How fucking naive are you?
We're living in a world where NSA has a fucking search engine for private information botnet is gathering
In the world where drones can make live surveillance
But botnet into software is too much, huh?

Also: NSA knew about heartbleed all this time. It was their little secret.
And you can still trust them making software for you..?

fuck off, jordan

Show your work:

Fedora
Debian a shit

>hivemind

Always do the opposite of what Sup Forums sez.

Debian

Debian

Devuan

Both are extremely stable and offer most of the same functionality and software. Both run on a wide rage of hardware. Debian focuses on long term support and compatibility. Fedora is bleeding edge but is still stable. I personally use Fedora, but I switched from Debian. I like them both.

>the US government is going to backdoor the OS that they use for all of their most sensitive and secret computing
Yeah, sure. Ok.

Systemd offers a lot of good features though. If you don't want to use it, this thread is not for you.

>Systemd offers a lot of good features though. If you don't want to use it, this thread is not for you.
Which init feature does systemd provide that OpenRC doesn't?

>the US government...
I don't really like repeating myself, but:
- NSA knew about heartbleed all the time and they didn't fixed it
- NSA asked Linus to implement backdoors
Heartbleed made linux vulnerable for 2 years. But, I guess US didn't used openSSL, right?
Americans are so naive, no wonder why they're so easily manipulated.

Little by little taking control of your GNU/Linux distribution, until it will be more systemd than GNU or Linux.