Which one is more Sup Forums approved? Fedora or Debian?
Fedora or Debian?
Other urls found in this thread:
schneier.com
twitter.com
Debian
Debian
Debian
Debian
Debian. Though, latest release is a joke.
NSA botnet vs distribution for lesbians... Hm...
...
>le nsa botnet meme
it's spread by nsa because they want you to use an insecure distro
the correct question is Debian sid or Fedora 26
the answer is Fedora 26 because stable distro, finished product, comes with all reasonable settings in pace for your security
Not a meme
Debian
>red hat is more hackable than other distros
>nsa is keeping american industry compromised
>nsa enables industrial espionage
>nsa works for china
it is a meme you retard
you must be a moron from some shithole
>redhat testbed
>"stable, finished product"
(You)
>le testbed meme
the only thing it lacks is long term support, otherwise it just ships newer software
they have an actual testbed, like debian sid
then they have alphas/betas
and then a finished product, which is better than any other "stable" distro out there
Implying that having backdoor it's instantly know to everyone else.
Implying it's on plain sight.
Fuck off
China would find and use it
it's unacceptable risk in commercial OSS and no agency would do that, they would rather FOIA for a copy of the entire system
sorry not FOIA, FISA
all these retards that unironically suggest debian because
>muh backdoor
>muh nsa
>muh redhat testbed
will happily defend the most backdoor-esque bug that ever made it into a mainstream distro ever: the debian predictable prng in openssl, purely due to the amateurs developers working on debian and their insistence on messing with every little package
Debian
Implying it wasn't NSA's jobs
>Inb4 it was a bug!!!
Implying it wasn't intentional bug
>Oh they surely wouldn't do that!
Why then NSA asks Linus to implement backdoor? That would compromise even more distributions.
>Inb4 they didn't!
OK
>2008
Show something from this decade grandpa.
Fedora
>>Inb4 they didn't!
>OK
stop pretending that you know what was asked specifically
and who said that Linus's father is not a Finnish attention whoring lunatic?
Debian
Neither. Both use systemd.
Why do you care what a bunch of immature NEETs and teena/g/ers think, anyways?
How fucking naive are you?
We're living in a world where NSA has a fucking search engine for private information botnet is gathering
In the world where drones can make live surveillance
But botnet into software is too much, huh?
Also: NSA knew about heartbleed all this time. It was their little secret.
And you can still trust them making software for you..?
fuck off, jordan
Show your work:
Fedora
Debian a shit
>hivemind
Always do the opposite of what Sup Forums sez.
Debian
Debian
Devuan
Both are extremely stable and offer most of the same functionality and software. Both run on a wide rage of hardware. Debian focuses on long term support and compatibility. Fedora is bleeding edge but is still stable. I personally use Fedora, but I switched from Debian. I like them both.
>the US government is going to backdoor the OS that they use for all of their most sensitive and secret computing
Yeah, sure. Ok.
Systemd offers a lot of good features though. If you don't want to use it, this thread is not for you.
>Systemd offers a lot of good features though. If you don't want to use it, this thread is not for you.
Which init feature does systemd provide that OpenRC doesn't?
>the US government...
I don't really like repeating myself, but:
- NSA knew about heartbleed all the time and they didn't fixed it
- NSA asked Linus to implement backdoors
Heartbleed made linux vulnerable for 2 years. But, I guess US didn't used openSSL, right?
Americans are so naive, no wonder why they're so easily manipulated.
Little by little taking control of your GNU/Linux distribution, until it will be more systemd than GNU or Linux.