>same performance than vega frontier edition
>same power draw than vega frontier edition
>but m-m-muh gaymen drivers
videocardz.com
wait™ the drivers & wait™ Navi
Vega RX benchmarks
Ian Turner
Other urls found in this thread:
nordichardware.se
gamersnexus.net
digiworthy.com
overclock.net
anandtech.com
twitter.com
Justin Howard
forgot
>$850
Parker Howard
this
AMDead
Elijah Wright
just run it on my 1070:
Graphics Score 20 771
So explain to me why would anyone buy a GPU that is twice the price, uses twice the power and is a year late to the party?
Colton Evans
Don't question AMD fanboys
Carter Thompson
That explains why they're poor.
Jaxson Clark
Price is unknown, that "leaked" price is complete BS
Power consumption is unknown but likely 250-275 watts
You are comparing a partner GPU to a reference GPU
Liam Collins
How many schmeckles are you being paid to shill? This is old news, no need to rehash
Luke Taylor
yeah yeah just wait™ for drivers/non-reference cards/navi/ and let the AMD wait->disappointment loop continue
Jaxon Smith
>but m-m-muh gaymen drivers
Whilst this is a ridiculous argument to begin with, nothing in your post disproves it whatsoever. The claim is that drivers will be ready for launch that will boost its performance. How would pre-release leaks using pre-release drivers be in any way relevant to that theory?
Bentley Rodriguez
Almost every post in this thread is anti-AMD circlejerk shitposts. This board is a fucking cesspool.
Austin Flores
you can always go back to r/amd
Juan Butler
since when price is announced?
Logan Taylor
...
Samuel Diaz
Shh can't ask difficult questions, the answer isn't printed on OP's Shill Instructions
Ethan Gomez
Rumor posted on Swedish site nordichardware.se
Brandon Allen
>More expensive than a 1080, whilst being barely-on-par performance-wise.
>Waiting all this time for fucking nothing
Does that offend you?
Jack Bennett
>Sup Forumsnu
>pro nvidia
Oh boy...
Hudson Butler
>what is occasional Sup Forums spillover that happens every GPU launch
?
Leo Foster
But all the "thermi" and 3.5 GiB meme. Sup Forums is the amd board. They hate nvidia and intel with passion.
Ethan White
And don't forget, all this with 375TDP and a year later than the competition.
Wtf is AMD thinking
Colton Ward
they aren't thinking
Hudson Foster
I'm calling BS.
Oliver Sanchez
Considering the results were posted by RTG marketer, it's BS.
Carson Sanchez
375 watt TDP was only on the watercooled Vega FE. I swear you idiots just show up and spout dumb shit all day.
Julian Cox
Fire Raja
Nolan Morris
If RX Vega is a cheaper 1080, I'm still going to buy it, But that's the best case scenario for Vega at this point, and AMD is going to lose a shit ton of money trying to sell it cheap compared to Nvidia with HBM2 and a larger die.
Andrew Nguyen
>replying to obvious bait
?
Juan Foster
are you frustrated
Caleb Lee
Really?
Andrew Mitchell
Here, I'll just copy/past from the other shitposting thread:
Threadly reminder that anyone who claims to "know" how RX Vega is going to perform is a clueless shitposter since all of Vega's new uarch features remain disabled in Vega FE's gaming drivers.
These include: Advanced Clock Gating and Adaptive Voltage and Frequency Scaling, it should also have Primitive Shaders, Tile Based Rasterization and a High Bandwidth Cache Controller
Proof:
gamersnexus.net
GN's article proves that Vega's Advanced Clock Gating isn't working at all, and that Adaptive Voltage & Frequency Scaling are in a failsafe mode where 1.2v is being used regardless of clocks. This is why GN was able to increase the performance of Vega FE by undervolting it to 1.09v and ~280w.
digiworthy.com
Here's proof that Tile Based Rasterization is not working on the current Vega gaming drivers.
overclock.net
HBCC and Primitive Shader are also disabled currently in gaming drivers.
Just to maybe get to to at least TRY and educate yourself a little bit, here is a nice article about what the implementation of TBR meant for Nvidia in going from Kepler to Maxwell:
anandtech.com
What does this mean? It means that until we see IF and how well RTG's driver team manage to implement these Vega uarch features by the launch at Siggraph it's actually impossible to know how RX Vega performs compared to Vega FE in gaming workloads.
Will RTG's driver team fail to implement ANY of these by Siggraph and it flops at launch? Who knows? How well will any of these actually be implemented by RTG? Who knows? There is way too large a gap between the floor and the ceiling here to make confident predictions.
Xavier Parker
They try so hard.
Carter Young
>anyone who claims to "know" how RX Vega is going to perform is a clueless shitposter
I disagree.
Ethan Diaz
Have a stroke, Jensen.
Thomas Bennett
No matter how good the R300 was all it showed is that for one reason or another people buy Nvidia even when they have an inferior product. See also: 970.
Hunter Brown
No, R300 sold INCREDIBLY well.
It was Evergreen that sold like shit compared to how good it was.
A shame, but whatever.