Why havent someone yet created a program that goes through the several million wikipedia listings...

Why havent someone yet created a program that goes through the several million wikipedia listings, attempts to organize them into smething usefull, and then tries to improve itself through the information available there?

Other urls found in this thread:

commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikipedia_mini_globe_handheld.jpg
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)],
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

sure, do it yourself! sounds like a fun weekend project

because ricing obscure linux distro with anime traps is considered more productive
you are on the wrong website, friend

That would be extremely dangerous for the human kind.

What would the point of that be exactly?

Cant, the only experience i have with coding is extremely basic HTML.

There is no point. But i suppose it'd be fun, like, just to see what comes out of it.

don't worry, i'll do the coding for you, just tell me how to achieve that.

Dunno man, but it seems like it'd be possible one way or another. Have no idea how though.

wikipedia is already useful

>it seems like it'd be possible one way or another
nope, not really

Oh, okay then. Guess i was just a bit too optimistic about this whole thing then.
Oh well.

Learn to program first u fucking retard, how about u learn how to generate some non-static content

I'd just like to interject for a moment. You appear to be using an element from this image in your post: commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikipedia_mini_globe_handheld.jpg
You may have done this accidentally, but you've violated the terms of its copyright license. This is a serious offense and I hope you take it as seriously as it deserves.
Not to say that you're not allowed to create derived works from this image, you are, but this picture is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Therefor, you are free:

to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work;
to remix - to adapt the work;

Under the following conditions:

attribution - You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
share alike - If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one.

In this case, the attribution requirement is resolved simply by including the following in your post:

Wikimedia Foundation [CC BY-SA 3.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0) or CC BY-SA 3.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Now that you have read this, I hope you have a better understanding of your rights and obligations when remixing and sharing this work. They will let you edit, now be nice and credit~

>semantic mediawiki will never be integrated into wikipedia

Great idea.
I'll get started on the logo

...uh

why this one out of all the millions of copyrighted images on Sup Forums?

what a lame attempt at shitposting.

>expecting a korean fishing forum has the brain capabilities to make this program
>expecting someone on here to be motivated enough to stop watching hentai trap porn and write some code
>expecting anything to be done from these anime addicted NEETs
Fuck summer

Because, unlike most other copyrighted images, this one respects you're freedoms (which you should know Sup Forums is in favour of) but ONLY if you comply with the license granting those freedoms.

its a lame attempt yet you still took the bait
congrats retard

boy semantic web is some hype i haven't heard about in years

clearly was the way of the future

Analyse the word patterns and use a frequency list to arrange them, prioritising based on general significance.