AMD's Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 3 1200 CPUs reviewed

AMD's Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 3 1200 CPUs reviewed

techreport.com/review/32301/amd-ryzen-3-1300x-and-ryzen-3-1200-cpus-reviewed

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=6ZifJ3DvumA
tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-3-1300x-cpu,5149-5.html
youtu.be/IoR0RDETGZI?t=6m47s
gamersnexus.net/hwreviews/3001-amd-r3-1300x-review-vs-7350k-intel-response/page-4
youtube.com/watch?v=Wqh3KKHXZcE
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

as if i3 chips could get any more useless

>techreport
Is that a pajeet website?

Looking good for Ryzen 3 especially if you can get a decent OC going.

>g4560 tier in games
well shit

It's my favorite tech site. Their reviews are high quality.

youtube.com/watch?v=6ZifJ3DvumA
LinusCockTips review just dropped too
as long as it's as cheap or cheaper than i3, these ryzen3s should be decent competitors.

Well, sometimes 4 cores pay off. Sometimes they don't. Competitively priced, although I'd like to see R3 for the price of a Celeron.

Well i guess its good i waited for them to drop instead of going for an i3 in a toaster.

tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-3-1300x-cpu,5149-5.html

INTEL CORE i3 BTFO
INTEL CORE i5 BTFO

tl;dr Pentiums and i3's are pointless.

INTEL PENTIUM Goy4560 BTFO

you cant even overclock any intel core i3 dual core and pentium dual core chips

also

>2017
>2 core

We looking at the same results? It crushes the G4560 and does even better when OCed.

youtu.be/IoR0RDETGZI?t=6m47s

>our fresh 2017 quadcore is slower than Intel's vintage 2011 chip
You can't make this shit up.

look at Tom's Intelshillware website instead

Intel Core i3 getting blown the fuck out there aswell

there's been huge discrepancies in the reviews I've read. tomshardware for example has it shitting all over the i3 chips

they're also showing the R3 1300X handily beating the R5 1500X so it could all be bogus AFAIK.

why didn't he overclock the Pentium G4560? fucking amd fanbouy

>AMD unboxed

Hahahaha loses to a fucking Skylake i3 the 6100 not even the higher clocked 7100 it's really competing with.

Why do you even bother? gamersnexus.net/hwreviews/3001-amd-r3-1300x-review-vs-7350k-intel-response/page-4

Intel still makes dual core CPUs?

What the fuck.

something something Intel artificially locks their processors so they can't be overclocked unless you pay a hefty price premium for an unlocked processor and also an overclockable motherboard

on linustechtips, pclab, benchmark, computerbase it was similar to g4560 or a bit faster
BUT it can overclock so that makes it a bit better and in almost anything that isn't a game it's faster

$109 and $129 on jewegg

I overclucked u're mum bitch

That out perform four physical Zen cores.
To date only the 1600 is worth a shit. This is hilarious.

Brian...

>quick lets find the one game where it wins

There's actually a reason R3s can beat R5 quad cores and that's architecture optimization. HT and SMT do the same thing but very differently, and for a long time HT was the more popular pick, so games are optimized for it, optimized so much that they handle much better on an R3 (basically an R5 quad without SMT) than they do on the R5. A good way to test this is to compare the two again, this time with SMT on the R5 disabled.

When you force Pajeet to compare core to core this is what you get.
2011 performance for $100 less.

An X299 RAID key (worth $300 has been bribed to your home adress).

Thanks again for being a part of The Mother of All Programs and MCP.

1700 is good too
1600 and 1700 are the best Ryzens when you overclock them

Only in a sick, degenerate, Jewified society is something this morally abhorrent is possible.

am i blind or is there no i7-2600k at stock?

Incucks btfo the fuck out.

...

...

>obvious test variance: average fps

...

...

...

...

i bet there will be a bios update to fix the r3s because basically every site shows something else

too upset; can't look: should just buy a used 6100 and h110 board on ebay

for example this

Pajeet3 confirmed pointless?

>same performance as i5-7500
>pointless
No.

Yeah there's a lot of variation going on here. Something's fucky for sure.

yup, just get a 1500x/1600, it's pointless to get a r3 right now with these prices

>same performance as i5-7500
Ah, I see you've applied the usual 1.3x AMD multiplier.

HMM I WONDER IF THEY'RE JUST USING TOTALLY DIFFERENT SHIT?
LIKE A 800MHZ DDR4 DIFFERENCE

So they're good for the price? i3 permanently killed and i5 bleeding seriously?

1 Intel cores == 2 AMD cores

Honestly it's a budget CPU so I wouldn't test with anything more than cheap-o 2666 or 3000.

And then you woke up.

this image implies that ryzens are slower at faster ram speeds because the anandtech results are better than the other with 3200mhz rams

Why do you even come here to shit up threads with this garbage?

the faster ram used in the OP's link only helps the ryzen chips and it's still losing to a i3 6100

..in power consumption

Neither is a fair benchmark.
The proper way is to use 3200+ on Ryzen and 2133 on Intel. That way AMD looks better which is only fair because Intel is evil.

7700k beating 1700 with half the cores
i3 6100 beating ryzen 3 with half the cores
1 intel core == 2 zen cores

And then you woke up.

>he doesn't recode anime while streaming and compiling linux kernel while also gaming at the same time
Incucks everyone

No.
Anand tech: "For our test we have scripted a version of the in-game benchmark. The in-game benchmark consists of five scenarios: four short panning shots with varying lighting and weather effects, and a fifth action sequence that lasts around 90 seconds. We use only the final part of the benchmark, which combines a flight scene in a jet followed by an inner city drive-by through several intersections followed by ramming a tanker that explodes, causing other cars to explode as well."
techport: youtube.com/watch?v=Wqh3KKHXZcE

They're using the game in totally different ways

I think he's sufficiently woke already, unlike AMDfriends.

t. intel engineer

Props to Intel for making a god tier gaming CPU.

Mad props to AMD for making a top tier gaming CPU and god tier all purpose CPU.

1700 is a good gaming cpu, sometimes it's really good, but it's not a top tier gaming cpu
for everything else, it's fucking great for the price

Nothing matters besides gaming, everything else is 0.5% of the market
Everyone who buys a CPU looks for gaming performance, and AMD is over 30% slower than equivalent Intel

Delidded 7700k with 280mm AIO and DDR4 4266 cl19 is the best video game platform that yields the highest FPS in the most situations.
Anything else is objectively inferior.
Including Threadripper and Skylake-X

It looks quite good.

>what is SMT

>over 30% slower
It's at most 10-15%. Stop jerking your fanboy dick off.

Another Major Disappointment, that's what you get for being a poojet rajesh school dropout haha fucking AMD cucks take that

and you're right on that one, maybe not 30% slower but you're right
for these people there's ryzen 5 1600 which is really good in games and good in everything else, or an 7700k but then you would need another $100 that you could spend on a better gpu, and don't forget that the 7700k comes without a cooler, so that's another $50

Yeah that's grate and all mr.delid dis, but this is a low end CPU thread, and you're comparing it to HEDT CPUs.

>and don't forget that the 7700k comes without a cooler, so that's another $50
Do you people always trash everything whenever you upgrade?
I've been using the same cooler for 5 years.

>Nothing matters besides gaming
Back to faggot.
How many times did you replace the fan on it?

Top jej
Jewtel btfo

0

>30% slower
did you fall into coma last 6 month?

i have a stock intel cooler for my i5-2500, i don't think that will be enough to cool a 7700k

>Nothing matters besides gaming

who in the world would run a 2600k at stock?

>People are unironically opting for a dual-core over a quad-core

someone with a non-k 2600 would probably not overclock it

>HT and SMT do the same thing but very differently
Wat. HT is just intel's trademarked name for their specific version of SMT.

?people are unironically opting for a dual core that gets higher fps than a quad core

the only thing anyone cares about is vidya perf

a 3 core part with 6 threads, smt enabled and high frequency would probably be the best thing for games in the foreseeable 2 year future

Weird how the 1200 and 1300X sometimes beat out the SMT enabled counterparts. I'm sure that single CCX parts don't get through quality control.

What about my utterly out-of-control porn habits?

>on linustechtips, pclab, benchmark, computerbase it was similar to g4560
Linus video doesn't include any pentiumG in their result you dumb fuck.

>having to circumcise your cpu to make it work properly
fucking hilarious

Now try to run something in the background with 2 cores and test the frame times. These game benchmarks do not show real life performance.

Not terribly impressed desu. Was expecting more.
The value proposition over something like a G4560 is okay for workstation tasks (which you shouldn't be doing on R3), but in games it's not really worth the extra money. If you OC that might be reasonable, but then you need B350, and GN reported trouble with the stock cooler so ymmv.

It further drives the i3 into irrelevance, but the Pentium already did that, and R3 doesn't do much to unseat it, at least in gaming.

Why shouldn't I be doing workstation tasks on a Ryzen 3?

Because Ryzen 5/7 are better suited to the task?

I owned an i3 6100 and it handled 60 fps no problem with my usual background tasks which are spotify, chrome, discord, afterburner, and keychatterfix.
Replaced it with a 7700k because it was incapable of 144hz.

lmoa a perfectly reasonable post devoid of bias. On fucking Sup Forums

Because it does terribly in them, and you'd be better off with an R5. Even the 1400 would be a substantially better buy.
In truth, the advantage of the R3 even over low-end intel chips isn't entirely clear cut even in professional workloads. It's kinda meh. Sometimes keeping pace with an i5, sometimes falling behind the Pentium.
The chip is kinda odd. Not a bad chip, but an inconsistent performer. I'd take it over a Pentium if it were only a bit more expensive, but $30 is pushing it when the prices are so low.