Don't mind me, just pirating this software

>don't mind me, just pirating this software

should have went with the adblock perspective, would have drawn more (You)s.

>both you and the other guy get to have their own wallet
what is the problem here?

We discussed this one million times already, copying isn't stealing, and the right to an idea doesn't exist.

This would be accurate if he was wirelessly making a copy without the person even noticing. But you're just here for the (you)

Here is a (you).

Pirating isn't even convenient anymore. Public trackers are a fucking shell of their former selves.

And filling out a questionnaire to get on some shitty private tracker is gay as hell.

>pirating software
>necessitates that the software is non-free
Enjoy your botnet.

>implying ppl who pirate software would actually buy it
piracy hurts free software way more than the owners of the piratet proprietary software

So the thief is giving me a free wallet because pirating it makes the software more popular? sounds about right

People reply to the poster not the post

>literally pirated a pic by screenshotting it

...

stealing from the developers not the guy seeding you idiot

>car manufacturer releases new car
>a few people buy it
>great reviews, it's a great car and everyone wants it
>someone comes out with a device that lets you clone cars
>everyone just starts copying cars from the few people who originally bought it
>car manufacturer is not getting any income
>can't afford to make new cars
>goes out of business

Piracy is only sustainable so long as pirates are a small minority, if everyone bought into the "hurr there's nothing wrong with piracy" meme and started pirating software, then the industry would collapse.

Why is debian logo all over OP's picture?

...

Uh, maybe because the guy deserves to have his wallet and you don't deserve to have his wallet. Why does everyone focus on the loss aspect of theft/piracy? What's relevant is that you're getting entertainment or software you don't have a right to.

How is this supposed to be a bad thing?

Pirating software is fucking stupid.
It would be trivial to put a root level virus
in it. Stick to GNU/Linux and just pirate
Books/Movies/Music/TV. Everybody wins!

The bike store made a poor investment by purchasing that bike. They'll be better off selling bike-as-a-service. If they can't adapt, they'll perish.

>free cars for everyone
Holy shit the world is saved, we can recycle all the cars for infinite resources, metal fortresses for everyone

>some other guy is giving away free open souce cars
>they are just as good
>he is fine

this is a good thing, user.

>>they are just as good
lmao

yeah lmao what an idiot. Should have said they are better.

I though you americlaps loved capitalism

>money doubled
>rampant inflation

How do I filter these threads??
I tried like 5 different wordings but it won't filter anything with greentext.

install gentoo

>install gentoo
Then my PC wouldn't work at all

...

read

theft implies loss. In "piracy", the software that is copied isn't lost by the creator(s), so both parties have their own copy.

That applies to the metaphor in the image but not the concept itself. Not an argument.

Why can't piratefags just admit that what they're doing is wrong? Why is there so much denial?

Communists have no respect for property

Let them be. Communists are raiding everywhere on Sup Forums, not only on Sup Forums unfortunately.

intellectual property law enforcement is funded by taxes you dumb socialist statists

>introducing artificial scarcity and subsidizing crony oligarchs through government enforcement

IPtards are the real communists

> why can't the manufacturer into cheap cloned cars?

this, IP enforcement is anti-competitive socialism

If the price reflected the cost of manufacture, it wouldn't be a problem..

Nobody minds the fact that digital content takes practically zero effort to duplicate when they're selling it

Did you not choose to sell digital content?

you're lumping hidden costs onto the taxpayer through the subsidization of irrelevant legal structures and the anti-liquidity of information capital

pick an industry that doesn't require me to fund your patent welfare you filthy communist statist IPtard

lol, i don't even

> complaining about free copies while selling free copies for not cheap

>jews getting btfo
How is this a bad thing?

>implying porky deserves to profit off of the work of others

There is literally nothing wrong with this scenario.

Then car manufacturer should let you drive a different car every day for a monthly fee. Get with da times gramps.

> tfw using linux since 2007

>You can now only get this program buy paying a fee every month instead of buying it at once
Fucking Adobe

I wonder what is going on inside OP's head? Does he think it's funny to repost the same thread over and over again? Does he get any enjoyment from that? Is he seriously trying to shame pirates with memes?

copying copyrighted material for self usage without selling/sharing is completely legal.

there is nothing wrong here.