HAHAHAHAHA AMD HOUSEFIRES ARE BACK

HAHAHAHAHA AMD HOUSEFIRES ARE BACK

INTEL WINS AGAIN

Other urls found in this thread:

pcworld.com/article/3214635/components-processors/ryzen-threadripper-review-we-test-amds-monster-cpu.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

But how?

>cpu+gpu
Check below the graph, it's obscured by the red line.

>OC
in the trashcan it goes

Fake as fuck

call nine one one

I sense suicide voltages.

the check box isnt fucking checked

What rate were these clocked to? If the indiatel is clocked at 3ghz and the AMD is hitting 5...

So Threadripper + Vega equals the end of this universe?

That's not funny.

Besides, it says Sytem power draw at the top.

>10% OC == 100% power draw


Ay wut

Where the hell does it say 10%?

>No source
>No system specs
>No CPU freqs
UMA

>no i9
>dubious OC values
myeh

How much is 400MHz out of 4GHz?

Why do you fuck create 10 threads per day about Intel/AMD? Gaymers BTFO!
>>>/pcbg/

Tom's fucked up somewhere. He's using an ANUS board, so it's probably their LLC boosting it to 1.6V or something.

Where's the numbers, faget

>amd 16-core use 35% more power than intel 8-core
>intel wins

>AMD is hitting 5
Now now, user. I want AMD to win too, but we all know that isn't true.

The 7900X is i9, it's just mislabeled.

Can't wait for the 12+ cores. They're going to be even more ridiculous.

Where do you even find this garbage. What are they even testing? I couldn't even find any info on their site.

I'm really curious about the 8 core Threadripper. Has the turbo or XFR been revealed yet? It might actually be a relatively decent overclocker based on the results we're seeing from the 1950X.

pcworld.com/article/3214635/components-processors/ryzen-threadripper-review-we-test-amds-monster-cpu.html

Looks like similar specs however keep in mind it's 4 cores per die, so you're not going to get the same results as if it were just an 1800X that OC's better.

It's P4 vs. K8 all over again holy shit hahahahaha

8700K will send amd back to the designated street

I think it will happen

>18 cores
>x299 socket can't support it
>it's on a new platform
>requires liquid nitrogen and a 2000w psu

Yes.. I can't wait for AMD to finally die.. it will be glorious day

yeah let Samsung buys AMD

>W-wait for Macaco Lake!

Dumb AMD retarded don't know how much money and effort Intel spends into making new architectures, they seriously think their bankrupt company can make something better they're fucking more delusional than Trump voters and should be gathered up and shot

Nice try Mr. Pedro Goldstein the Third

...

>Samefag with the exact same broken English

Kill yourself.

>Dumb AMD retarded don't know how much money and effort Intel spends into making new architectures
All of their attempts were complete failures, you stupid fuckstick.

Dumb poojet piece of shit

Kill yourself.

you mad

Intel can only do what they did with X299- ramp up prices, clockspeeds and temperatures and hope nobody notices the TDP has been completely blown past.

Learn English, and then kill yourself. Or just kill yourself. Your choice.

I like how OP's picture has *no* information about how far he's OC'd, whether it's under load or not, or even numbers on the i9.

>it's the mad "kill yourself" amd shill episode

In other benchmarks I've seen Threadripper drawing less power at stock than Skylake-X.

They were all paid off by AMD, thus completely wrong and biased

But the ones paid off by Intel are completely honest and 100% accurate :^)

So AMD paid off all the reviewers, fascinating things to do with literally no money in their pockets.

Nice try poojeet

>4 watt difference for 3.9ghz
Considering that TR has twice as much processing power, more power draw isn't surprising, but that tiny leap for OC is pretty good

Especially since i9 7000x has twice its normal power draw for...what, exactly? It's missing any OC numbers. Awful convenient.

>Idle

*7900x, my bad

Is the Ryzen 7/1700 the cream of the crop there?

We all know winblows does a stupid amount of "idle" process bullshit.

He's trying to mislead you with idle numbers, load numbers are a completely different story.

Speaking seriously, is Ryzen 16-core a good choice if I plan on a workstation build for multiple simultaneous virtual machines (no real gaming)?

Or should I just save up for a xeon

>power consumption
>housefire

You got your memes mixed up.

Intel is always better

You have to be paid to think this is a good thing for the industry.

I love computing, AMD has sliterally destroyed innovation, progress by their glued slow core shit

>Mislabeled graph is a reliable source of information
\g\ has really gone to the shits lately.

ruh-roh

O MY DELICIA MACACO

HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN TO ME

I MADE MY MISTAKES

I'VE GOT NOWHERE TO RUN

No one cares for rendering, 99% of people are fine with a dual core.

THE NIGHT GOES ON

2 cores? Why do you need 1 core? Nobody could actually use a FPU anyway HELP POLICE THIS MAN IS THREATENING ME WITH 8-BIT INTEGERS !!

AS I'M FADING AWAY

I'M SICK OF THIS LIFE

I JUST WANNA SCREAM

Fake News.
Damage Control.
Sad!

Don't listen to this macaco fucker Threadripper is great value (32 threads for $1K) and won't have anemic clockspeeds like the Xeons.

nigga that's 16 cores, of course it's going to draw some watts, plus all the PCIe lanes (64)

>3% higher power draw
>15-30% higher pwerformance
looks fine

see Looks like intel is going all out with the shilling today.

see
inb4 single thread benchmarks on a HEDT platform

>My old FX6300 is up there with the i7s and Threadrippers

What the fuck man, its way too slow for this power draw.

see

nah, at least till zen 2 intel has single core over amd, p4 v k8 was a complete bloodbath in amd's favor as far as performance was concerned.

How will intel ever recover?

sure, at stock the 1950x does even better in comparison. but even when OCed it's not exactly bad.

Kill yourself.

look into iommu groups and if threadripper has the same issues ryzen has.

I want to say threadripper is worth it regardless but if it has the same issue its a pain in the dick to deal with.

IOMMU groups have been fixed a while ago

DELID THIS

...

Pretty sure that's not a checkbox but a legend

I didn't say that, I just said there is an i9 on it.

Is that supposed to be 89.9 billion instructions per second?

DELID THIS REEEE

7900x only on 284 while 99% of the reviews put it on 353
oc threadripper blows everything out who would have knew!
its like physics apply to amd!

LN2 is cheap they gonna bundle it with phase change cooling with liquid helium inside
literally the way cern cool down the super collider

the world is moving away from that single core meme few games and few applications are what is left

>dual core

cant wait to see that 18 core i9 being OCed

not even industrial level capacitors will be able to feed it

>up to 10% workload on 16 cores vs up to 10% workload on 10 cores
>objective proof that AMD is ~1% more efficient per core
>Intel wins

Yes