CNET now reporting on the lawsuit and accusations by fired Google employee about their toxic work environment and...

CNET now reporting on the lawsuit and accusations by fired Google employee about their toxic work environment and wrongful hiring practices.

youtube.com/watch?v=TrTQgSBFfo0

>tfw everyone turns against the botnet

I don't see the end but I can only hope.
Godspeed.

thanks, cnet. keep us updated.

Post yfw the race war begins with Google

What an informative and unbiased video from cnet. Good for them.

>mfw today i jumped ship from chrome to pic related

no regrets :}

Use Icecat

Not even a majority of Google's own employees agree with the firing.
>nordic.businessinsider.com/many-google-employees-dont-think-james-damore-should-have-been-fired-2017-8

Out of the frying pan into the fire

Freaks gonna freak.

That was pretty unbiased.

I pray this spark ignites the flame that destroys google

omg it's bridget carey from cnet! I thought she left

Mmmmm

>Suing fucking Google
God speed

>illegal hiring practices

Were they really? Is hiring based on quotas essentially discriminatory against white males?

isn't CNET's download.com the site that packs all types of malware into legit downloads?
why are you the good guys now?

It depends on your definition of "malware"

Malware as in damaging viruses and shit? No you're delusional.

Malware as in annoying ads? Delete them.

>Malware as in annoying ads? Delete them.
as in all types of search bars, literal adware that ends up installing more stuff on reboot....
you have become softonic, lads

Yep. And there's a rumour that damores is also thinking of suing them from the angle of a whistle blower(I.e you cannot fire a person who is a whistle blower legally).

your download website is even blocked in ublock by default
shady business.....

If women are genetically less inclined to be interested in technology, it actually means the opposite of what people want it to.
In order to create equal opportunities, you have to support women MORE because those that are interested have a harder time pursuing it.

Don't forget it's just all in all that they are less inclined. Individuals vary greatly.

The paper didn't say that at all, it merely stated why less women tend to choose for these types of jobs.

Way to twist the point you stupid fuck

>because those that are interested have a harder time pursuing it.

Why's that?

...

Yes I understand why he would be motivated to twist the argument, it just disgusts me

jumping to chrome in the first place was retarded

yeah, just wanted to support your point a little further

That'll buy a lot of peace pipes

next time you notice, you are part of the exclusive SeaMonkey club

...

Why is everyone in IT ugly as sin and like that's not enough they also wear shittiest clothes possible.

Brogamer detected.

First two results
>BBC - Capital - What Google engineer James Damore got wrong
>James Damore Memo: Google Right to Fire Him | Fortune.com

Very subtle, gaggle.

>200 million per year to run a company into the ground
Google, hire me. I'll do it for 199 million AND I won't shit in parking lot.

...

This is what I got. Based Chicago Tribune?

How to be hired by Google

You might want to do yourself a favor and remove the home, bookmark, ?? and screenshot icons, and then the search bar and turn your URL bar into a search bar instead.

Next decade pajeet will full MBA school

>finally, a job at the top of the industry!
>12+ years working experience

Our race is still fucked even when Google goes down, we are still moving away from traditionalism and self hatred still lingers