Vega56 VS GTX 1070 benchmark

3D Mark - Fire Strike Ultra

Vega 56 - 5373
GTX 1070 - 4471 (Non FE)

youtube.com/watch?v=l51WwFV8l6s

Is this real?

Other urls found in this thread:

videocardz.com/71953/are-these-radeon-rx-vega-56-benchmarks
rbt.asia/g/search/text/"AYYMDPOORFAGS"/
rbt.asia/g/search/text/"AYYMD HOUSEFIRES"/
reddit.com/r/Amd/
videocardz.com/71958/prototype-radeon-rx-vega-56-pictured-with-three-fans
techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_1070/22.html
myredditvideos.com/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Oi WUT?

>20% difference vs. partner GPU
Doesn't seem likely.

P O O

Reminder to report shitposters.

LOO

LOO

Based on the microscopic amount of information we have so far, it could be. Seems like the Vega 56 is a much more of a midway point between the 1070 and 1080 than a direct competitor to the 1070 in performance. The missing 8 compute cores probably won't hurt it that much in games and the lower thermals and TDP mean it should run cooler as well. I don't see why it couldn't be a great overclocker too if the Vega 64 is clocked the way it is. Vega 56 seems like a GTX 1070 killer, Vega 64 not so much a GTX 1080 killer due to the power consumption.

You literally need to OC HBM to get it to 64 perf.
Also he locked the video, he broke the NDA lmao.

He removed the video it seems and probably broke the NDA.

Well if it was real .. Vega 56 might be worth it. Vega 64 is probably still not, though.

He obviously broke the NDA.
Notice the WX9100 on his table.

So 56 is great and 64 is trash?

It means they fixed the bandwith bottleneck. 56 performs like that with silly low clocked memory.
Even 64 is worth it now.
Both are great assuming Vega10 is no longer BW-bottlenecked.

AYYMD HOUSEFIRES

it s not that it s trash , it s cause NVIDIA with the 1080ti basicly went light years ahead , and they still use gddr5x ... AMD is 1 year behind

I want to believe.

>believe
It was on the video.
OC the memory and it's going to be even faster.

post mirror

repeat after me:
1070 performance
videocardz.com/71953/are-these-radeon-rx-vega-56-benchmarks

>repeat after me:
Vega 56 is slightly faster than 1070 performance over 25 games

That's hilariosly bad for 3.5k ALU card with a fuckton of uarch improvements.
Bigger Polaris would've performed better a year ago.

Looks to be a great 1440P GPU and since that is what I have I think that is what I am going to get (Miner fags permitting).

I actually wonder why they simply didn't go with a die-shrunk Fiji-XT with GDDR5 memory controller... The clock difference alone would probably put it against GP104.

Reasons?
Who knows.
It would definetly be better (and earlier) than Vega.

RTG don't have the resources so they had to go with one GPU and that was aimed at the pro market. RX is an afterthought.

Making bigger Polaris would've been silly easy. It would also launch a whole fucking year before the abortion that is Vega.

The theoretical product from my brand is better than the actual product from your brand.

The money is in pro machine learning cards. Just about every auto manufacturer is looking at nvidia right now for self driving car research. AMD needed to get back in that market.

>The money is in pro machine learning cards.
There's none considering meme ASICs are coming.
>Just about every auto manufacturer is looking at nvidia right now for self driving car research.
Even less money and even more memes.
No, AMD needs to make good iGPU.
That's it.

Where do you buy these cards at release?

Do they just show up at ebay/amazon/newegg or can I order them somewhere before they run out of stock?

>Do they just show up at ebay/amazon/newegg or can I order them somewhere before they run out of stock?
Yes.
But they won't run out of stock, Vega is bad at both gayming and mining.

The Vega was on development ages ago. Raja said that it started before her joined the team so it's not his architecture, he only finished it.

>Vega is bad at both gayming and mining
>and mining


>RX VEGA 64 MINING EDITION?
>It was confirmed by OCUK’s Gibbo that
>“Seems the hash rate on VEGA is 70-100 Mh/s per card, which is insanely good.

Bigger Polaris would still be better and cheaper for gaymen.
Consumer Vega is a total disaster.
Shrout says it's the same as FE hash rate.

I'm saying that they might started polaris and Vega at the same time. They didn't think that Vega would be such a failure.

You can always can the design if it's bad.
They could've also launched 64CU Polaris.
It would performs the same as Vega.
Heck, probably better.

video is delet

No video?

i still believe they are sandbagging. They'll bring down the power usage while keeping the computing power and put two on a card with IF. But nvidia needs to get comfy and fuck up their next generation first.

Anyone managed to mirror the vid?

>sandbagging on launch day
?
And AMD never sandbags anyway.
RX Vega is DOA.

It was only up for a few minutes. I saw it, though.

Keep wasting your time nvidshill, no one will ever care.

>20% ahead on the cut-down version is "struggling"
You realize this is Vega 56, not Vega 64?

You do realise it's 3.5k ALU card?

Was it just the benchmark result?

videocardz.com/71953/are-these-radeon-rx-vega-56-benchmarks

STAY MAD, AYYMDPOORFAGS

i mean they sandbagged until now.

Did you really just autism so hard over your phones auto correct that you deleted and reposted?

I'm alright with that

Why would I be mad? Vega 56 is 400 dollars while the 1070 is 450-500.

>25 games avarage
SOPAq

Someday we might find out how to cure this kind of autism.

rbt.asia/g/search/text/"AYYMDPOORFAGS"/
rbt.asia/g/search/text/"AYYMD HOUSEFIRES"/

>launch day
>3.5k ALU card performs the same as heavily cutdown GP104
>sandbagging
?
>acceptance
Good job.
Lower your standards.

I saw your embarrassing spelling monkey, just stop

>3.5
DOA

There is no bad card, there is only a bad price.
Faster you learn that, better it be for you.

>Same performance = lower standards
Ok. The power draw isn't as much of a dealbreaker as it is with Vega 64.

It's a bad card with a bad price.
Fucking hell 1070 has $349 MSRP, it can be OCed and it's more efficient.
It's still 210w vs 150w.

It's today your first day in the internet? There were dozens of "leaks" in the past. We had tonnes of info about these cards a half year ago that created false expectations.

>1070 has $349 MSRP
Not anymore, nvidshill.

>1070 has $349 MSRP
Good luck finding it at that price. Good luck finding Vega 56 at all, after it launches.

Why would anyone even buy 56?
It's shit at mining.
And shit at gaymen.
What's the purpose of it?

Is it just fantasy?

You keep saying that, but do you have [citations]

>shit at gaming
it matches the 1070 right there
that's not "shit at gaymen"

NVIDSHILL ALERT
NVIDSHILL ALERT

>Struggling against 1 year old GTX 1070 while consuming 210W

TOP KEK

>3.5k ALU card barely matches 1070 in gaymen
>not shit
?
Just buy a fucking 1070.

it'll be crippled in a few months

>300W AYYMD HOUSEFIRES losing to 180W GTX 1080
>210W AYYMD HOUSEFIRES losing to 150W GTX 1070

AYY

>3,5k ALUS!! THE ALUUUS
Yep, it has 3.5K alus and guess what it's a big chip.
You know who gives a shit about that? Nobody.

Maxwell was not crippled.
Please stop your delusions.
Vega is late, hot, big and underperforming.
There's no magic drivers.
Nothing.
They conceded one generation to nVidia and about to lose the next one!
Formiddable efforts, RTG.

>shit at gaymen
>Struggling against
>losing to
The damage control shilling has already started and the card's not even fucking out yet.

You know AMD might be onto something when the shitposting intensifies

>TFW to intelligent to use GDDR5/5X

People already benchmarked that.
It's 1070 perf.
3.5k ALUs are supposed to perform much better, given the uarch improvements.

>3.5k ALUs are supposed to perform much better
It does, it performance like magic in where ALUs matter. That aint games.

Founders Edition

>losing to over year old cards
>damage control
madtards are special kind of stupid

How is that acceptable?
Preforming on par with a 1 year a old 1070, while consuming 2x power
The minute miners get ahold of it, prices will go up 30%+ over MSRP
Putting it at gtx1080 money

We all know AMD fans don't have money.
If they had $500+ to spend, they would have gotten a gtx1080 or ti a long time ago.

reddit.com/r/Amd/

AYYMD shilling central already imploding from the disappointment, top kek

>given the uarch improvements
It's like you can't fucking read.
Vega was supposed to remove inherent GCN bottlenecks so it would be able to fucking saturate the ALUs.
And well fuck me it brought MORE bottlenecks.
Bravo RTG!

It's acceptable because I don't have to give money to nvidia. And that's priceless.

Even though it was just show to be pretty much dead even? Yeah, you're a fucking twat. videocardz.com/71953/are-these-radeon-rx-vega-56-benchmarks

I feel bad for them

videocardz.com/71958/prototype-radeon-rx-vega-56-pictured-with-three-fans

You're a big heatsink

>while consuming 2x power
40% more power is not 200% more power, you are bad at math. Also, NVidia calculates their TDP differently anyway.

FOR YOU

this, i really wonder what the 10.5Tflops are doing

40% more power, 40% more heatsink. Seems legit.

>NVidia calculates their TDP differently anyway.
another amdtard lie that has been debunked countless times

What are you even talking about? Do you just like throwing random shit in the air and hope it sticks?

techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_1070/22.html

Keep on being forever assblasted, AYYMDPOORFAGS

>Rewarding a bad company because you hate another.
I will understand you guys.

Holy cringe. If the partner cards don't come out early sept im finna just buy a 1070

Holy fucking fuck; Vega was supposed to bring higher perf/alu compared to Polaris, but it actually fucking regressed.
Choking some cocks.

Do you know even what TDP and power draw mean, retarded drone?

More