Good non-botnet alternative with ublock and sync?
activistpost.com
Shit
Leo Watson
Other urls found in this thread:
activistpost.com
reddit.com
theborneopost.com
collective-evolution.com
townhall.com
forbes.com
gurufocus.com
en.wikipedia.org
blog.mozilla.org
twitter.com
Justin Nguyen
fake news
Jaxon Cook
This, which proves Mozilla needs to fight fake news.
Andrew Smith
Friendly reminder that it's not fake news until Donald Trump tweets it.
Isaac Sanders
nice fake news poltard
Kayden Turner
Source other than some site with "daily" in its name or right winged?
Luis Turner
Netrunner :^D
Anthony Perry
From the same website:
The Unknown Reasons Doctors Push Vaccines
activistpost.com
Leo Scott
I wish moot never left. He was a terrible admin but at least he kept Sup Forums chimps in their designated shitting street. Hirohito won't because they make him money with ads.
Jonathan Brooks
From a Mozilla employee on the Firefox subreddit:
>Mozilla is not associated with George Soros, the articles you linked to are from dubious sources, and attempt to create an association by saying that Mozilla's project launches around the same time as some other project Soros is involved with (I am not familiar with his project) and thus inferring that because they happened around the same time that they are related.
Source: reddit.com
Oliver Reyes
Nice try shill
Owen Jenkins
...
Bentley Baker
Brave shill on suicide watch. Chrome mad, Edge jelly.
Juan Morgan
wtf lol
vaxxers talking about tech
XD
Jack Baker
The “Mozilla Information Trust Initiative” comes as an automated real-time fact-checking engine developed by the Full Fact foundation was demonstrated in London
theborneopost.com
Adrian Allen
You literally sound like a stereotypical robot that is overloading and spewing out random phrases in its death throes.
Jason Garcia
google and facebook have automated fact checkers too that they tested during the 2016 election cycle
why dont we hear about them from Sup Forums?
the soros part is the fake news and a perfect example of why we need these systems
Josiah Roberts
The sad thing is the vast majority of people will be perfectly fine with having their information curated and "verified" for them, completely oblivious to the thought of someone using that power to push an agenda.
Julian Reyes
Only Sup Forums and redditor kekistanis care about this because it cripple their ability to """report""" on things that didn't happen and simply ignore science because it's inconvenient. It will damage their ability to spread propaganda so they are screeching.
Tyler Martinez
We've been letting search engines do that to us for years. What makes the news special?
Jordan Ramirez
>our censorship project has nothing to do with george soros' censorship project so it's totally fine :^)))))
Parker Wilson
it is because thats all poltards care about
if it wasnt muh soros there wouldnt be a issue because other companies have had this technology for years
including google
Aaron Ward
As a first, Activist Post is a conspiracy theory website.
As a second, what Mozilla might be making is essentially something that already exists in the form of various web plugins: a BS detector. It looks at a given domain and lets you know if the domain has a bad reputation. There are similar algorithms for detecting malicious websites that host malware. Neither one of these technologies prevents users from uploading such content and neither one of these technologies prevents users from navigating to such sites.
Josiah Hall
>saying things are false is censorship
Parker Powell
that's only phase one.
Liam Cruz
Just like the media have been """"reporting""" on Russia hacking the election and colluding with Trump for the last six months, despite there still being zero evidence.
That candid CNN video really cleared things up.
Xavier Hernandez
>this is what anti white cucks actually believe
To bad the car didn't kill you too
David Young
Just post reputable news sources. Fuck, it's not hard.
Asher Clark
Translation;
>post democrat funded fake news only
Hudson Clark
REEEEEEEE SOROS OWNS GOOGLE
REEEEEEE
gurufocus.com
Chase Bennett
oh, it's the old "every news network except the one I like is making shit up" garbage. there is no net loss from warning people when they visit a website that publishes antivax, muh gmo, and/or climate change doesn't real that they're likely to encounter made up bullshit and lies. Due to whatever the fuck happened in the American right, there are simply no right-wing publications that make an effort to stay unbiased and truthful. There aren't many on the left either, but at least there are some.
Essentially, this is a good thing for everyone but Trumpanzees.
Leo Rodriguez
Reality has a democratic bias.
Juan Clark
tfw soros was one of the main people funding NetNeutrality.
tfw soros is actually a pretty cool dude :^)
Carson Lee
Further on this:
Google was fine having "Santorum" top result be to a personal website instead of the senator's website.
en.wikipedia.org
This was before the "fact checking" campaign they had, but still. Most people searching that search term were looking for news or the website of Rick Santorum, not a left-leaning blog.
Henry Bennett
There are literally none on the left either.
Every single one of them have posted about the Russia bullshit as though it's anything other than the Democrats trying to make up a reason why they lost a fair election.
Then two weeks later they started saying Trump was trying to start a war with Russia. All of them are incredibly biased and full of shit.
Samuel Price
Then you do agree that fighting fake news is important? Or should CNN be allowed to continue to spread lies?
William Gray
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE stop talking about Russia even though Trump has gone off to secret meetings with Putin and asked if he could pardon himself!!
>REEE stop reporting on Trump's abysmal approval ratings!!
I suppose you'd rather have them "reporting" on the imaginary underage sex trafficking ring for politicians in a pizza place, right?
William Wood
fake news don't have to be fought by censoring them, but by proving why they are fake.
People needs to be educated to find out by themselves if the source is reliable or not.
Christopher Lewis
>Literacy
>We can’t solve misinformation with technology alone—we also need to educate and empower Internet users, as well as those leading innovative literacy initiatives.
>Mozilla will develop a web literacy curriculum that addresses misinformation, and will continue investing in existing projects like the Mission: Information teaching kit.