Why do things run great on Intel CPUs?

Why do things run great on Intel CPUs?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=JypkqwpOtNI
youtube.com/watch?v=X6Ovmxfejvo
youtube.com/watch?v=bBKHsMar1Jo
youtube.com/watch?v=OZcCqnE5mRw&t
youtube.com/watch?v=qswrFCb5sMQ
youtube.com/watch?v=yuQu-y0GnPM
youtube.com/watch?v=ybF7r4rogHc
youtube.com/watch?v=11NfsMykyAk
arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/08/amd-threadripper-review-1950x-1920x/
arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/08/mistakes-in-our-testing-methodology-wrongfully-cause-7900X-to-appear-slower-in-some-titles/
youtube.com/watch?v=hE7qMJVll5U
tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-admits-problems-pentium-iii-1,235.html
pcper.com/news/Editorial/Yes-Netburst-really-was-bad-CPU-architectures-tested
anandtech.com/show/11110/semi-critical-intel-atom-c2000-flaw-discovered
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Faster Function Units. It's a known fact that Intel has better FUs than AMD. Their superscalar professors are just naturally better because of this.

Because Intel paid you to say so.
/thread

AMD CPOOs are inherently cheap knockoffs. That's literally the only reason AMD exists - making budget clones of Intel chips. Some things never change.

Or maybe it's because Intel products don't stutter.

>one gaymen benchmark

Nobody buys Intel stutterfires anymore since Ryzen is smoother and infinitely better in every conceivable way.

Runs great on my PC.

Now for the actual proof

youtube.com/watch?v=JypkqwpOtNI
youtube.com/watch?v=X6Ovmxfejvo
youtube.com/watch?v=bBKHsMar1Jo
youtube.com/watch?v=OZcCqnE5mRw&t
youtube.com/watch?v=qswrFCb5sMQ
youtube.com/watch?v=yuQu-y0GnPM
youtube.com/watch?v=ybF7r4rogHc
youtube.com/watch?v=11NfsMykyAk

That's all well and good, but an i7 still runs great on my machine.

That's because you think stutters are normal.

|
|>
|
|3
|
|

No matter how many times you post this, you will never be any less of a faggot.

>How convinent that the 7900X isn't on that chart and you just happened to pick the image using a R9 Fury (why?)

>And the other GPU they test with is a 1080, not even a 1080ti. Anandtech's testing has been a fucking joke lately.

>Ironically the "ultra best gaming GPU" 7740K does just as bad as TR here. Even though I'm sure there's some other problem with their testing methodology.

arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/08/amd-threadripper-review-1950x-1920x/

Get back to work, Brian.

The results of this test already got debunked, Intel is way ahead.

Source?

o vey

arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/08/mistakes-in-our-testing-methodology-wrongfully-cause-7900X-to-appear-slower-in-some-titles/

>uppercase X in fake URL

You didn't even try and make it believable. 0/10.

>no doom benchmanrk
into the thrash

nice digits, but doom is trash and should be in the trash

ITT: good goys

Best game of last year, bro.

...

>Why do things run great on Intel CPUs?
>Implying they do

youtube.com/watch?v=hE7qMJVll5U
tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-admits-problems-pentium-iii-1,235.html
pcper.com/news/Editorial/Yes-Netburst-really-was-bad-CPU-architectures-tested

Ah yes, let's not forget the recent Atom - blunder of the decade.

anandtech.com/show/11110/semi-critical-intel-atom-c2000-flaw-discovered

>literally the best game in terms of optimization
>also great game overall
>thrash
is this what shills belive?

Sorry, I couldn't resist

If it runs better on AMD, it's trash. That's how it works, didn't you get the memo?

10/10.

...