There is no good women that knows how to code

>There is no good women that knows how to code
say that again?

>doesn't even post her online code repository
How can I even judge her code?

Thats a tranny

Eso es una trampa

>Spouting memes about systemd is coding

>women think that systemd is bad

Thats definite proof that systemd is good

She's the chick that uses BSD, right? Just curious.

it looks feminine to me

No that's a trans-pacific wood elf gender-lender fender-bender quazi socio-cataractic leo-nazi schplong morgous board retro active milk kin jin aphrodisiac lentil fruit queener rebreener

Would suck her feminine penis.

I wish there were real women with feminine pussy that hated systemd

>some mentally ill cunt with warning colorations hair said something about something she has no clue about
yeah, that'll show them!

>hates systemd
>BSD
>cute
>anti-communist
honorary woman

>honorary woman
kek'd.

I never understood the hair thing until now. One of my cousins stained her hair blue and now won't fucking talk to me despite us being essentially childhood friends.

Is this the end user? Is she going to be stuck like that until she dies or am I ever gonna get my cousin back? I miss her desu.

Seconded just for hating systemd.

>Is this the end user? Is she going to be stuck like that until she dies or am I ever gonna get my cousin back? I miss her desu.
she's done for user. she's been absorbed by a cult.
there's no way out. forget her.

>Is this the end user? Is she going to be stuck like that until she dies or am I ever gonna get my cousin back?
Unlikely
Red hair = red alert (she sold her soul to bolshevism)
But a miracle can always happen

My mother and sister were programmers. Not all women programmers are freaks or are stupid.

Mother was doing graphics programming in the 80s for Apple, Xerox, IBM, etc. Smart as fuck.

Sister was a programmer until she decided raising her children was more fulfilling to her.

Not all women programmers are freaks with dyed hair who are seeking attention saying stupid shit.

I support systemd now

Me too.

>anti-communist
Reminder, if you're not a communist/socialist/anarchist in 2000+17, you're a brainlet.

Capitalism is literally the just wait™ ideology.

So your dad and brother came out as women and changed their sex? It's cool that you're so accepting, user.

t. Jacob Epstein-Horowitz

That
Is
A
Guy

Jews are extremely pro-capitalism, though. Money is their power.

This is equivalent to:
>There is no man that wants to fuck a car
The beauty of the humankind is that there is an exception for EVERYTHING, including things like "there is no man that can truly understand electricity" and "there is no man able to restrict electricity to only run for one direction".

when will we finally find an exception for “there is no normal person on Sup Forums” though

There's probably a few on the most casual shit boards.

true, which might be why these board are the most casual shit ones

Nice meme.

Bankers = jews
Stock brokers = jews
Federal Reserve chairman = jew
US secretary of treasury = jew
Capitalist media = jews

But keep telling yourself Jews are anti-capitalist like a good goy while you put your money in jew banks.

>i hate systemd too! please have sex with me!
How desperate do you have to be?

Just taking one single look is enough to determine that this is a tranny.

Bottom row, second to right. I don't see a warning desu. Only invitation.

its funny how I follow at least two or three programmers on twitter that are trans, use a variant of BSD, and are actually good. Weird trend but I have nothing against it.

...

It's feminine enough for me

You mean if your a communist/socialist/anarchist, you are a brainlet. The ideology has been tried in how many cultures around the world and caused an economic/social collapse in most of them and the ones that are still around switched to a pseudo-capitalistic economic system because it was at the verge of failure. Only a brainlet would defend an ideology from the 1800s that clearly doesn't work.

who cares
fight the systemd menace!

(you)

>implying capitalism isn't causing a social collapse
huh ok

>Venezuela, the USSR, Cambodia and Vietnam collapsed because of capitalism, not central planning ran by corrupt as fuck individuals and unlimited social welfare
>China took up a mixed model economy because it's economy under socialist orthodoxy was just peachy and capitalism (not socialism) made them spend shittons of money on programs that delivered few results
K

That is like a medieval feudalist saying that democracy have been tried so many times and failed every single time. Yeah, Greek democracies couldn't survive against monarchies, but that doesn't mean democracy is a bad idea. It just means the world wasn't ready for democracy at the time.
I would say socialism is the same for our era. Plus there is the fact that the United States actively makes sure no socialist country ever stands on its feet.

I don't think anyone said no women can code, just not many of them. Regardless, someone saying systemd is shit doesn't make them good at programming. Please improve your bait next time.

Except that most democracies established in the 1800s still exist to this day like France,Italy and most of the democracies in Western Europe along with the US, albeit with more corrupt individuals in power. Socialist nations didn't really start existing till the early 1900s and most of them had already collapsed by the late 1900s and are rebuilding themselves as capitalistic nations. Even China gave up pure socialism and opted for a mixed model because leaving people in charge of the wealth of the nation only leads them to be greedy bastards and take a good chunk for themselves along with not investing enough in economic infrastructure and too much into social programs, which has an adverse effect on the economy.Socialism doesn't work because the framework is extemely faulty, even with democracy the only reason why it works is because the frameworks of gov't ensures that each citizen has their rights respected and the gov't is not an intrusive force on one's life, unless they break the law and it took thinkers like Locke to get that much right.

Is that a giant MacBook Pro stand?

Pretty laxed definition of feminine.

That's a man.

>rustaceans
always gets me

if radfems effectively destroy systemd project...
they do have monopoly over general public morality, and are well funded by the 7+ digit figures by useful idiots
they could shift public opinion on a whim since they are womyn
a smear campaign to make systemd a "software for the patriarchy" could actually work.

But democracy IS a bad idea.

"systemd" reminds me of system c, therefore it is bad.

>muh systemd!!! muh botnet!!!
>muh actually functional operating system!!!

>nobody uses Gabario

They don't want others to be capitalist, which is why they led the communist movement which always results in rich dictators that lord over everyone else.

owo whats this

Sup Forums is filled with normal people, normal people are the shittiest.

ITT dumb fucks argue over tokenisms and what they mean.

>woman (male)

Trannies are now our allies in the fight against systemd

Hahahahahaha

>Thats a tranny
It sure is. OP would have known that had he not had a porn addiction and "blurred the lines". I think he's still living in some Hollywood induced fairy tale.

Do you think revolutions in those countries happened out of good living? Any revolution causes a collapse and capital flight, look at the modern Ukraine that inherited a fuckton of good shit from Soviet Union and zero debts - and how they wasted it all in a quarter of a century of throwing over their gov't every few years. Look at Middle Eastern wars and Arab Spring and what had followed.

As for Soviet Union, they brought out reforms that were fucking half-century late under rather backwaters agrarian Empire and managed to achieve rapid urbanisation and industrialisation quite well. And a rapid recovery from WWII. To the point that half a century later they sent a first man to space and went toe-to-toe with the United States in military and tech. The reason for USSR demise was losing a trade war in the first half of the 80s that was natural for imperialism, for which expansion is a necessity - and that was ~1/3 of global economy virtually inaccessible for the US.

There is no good women that knows how to code.
That intelligent male simply knows that programming socks will make him a better programmer. That is not a woman.

>Do you think revolutions in those countries happened out of good living?
No. But there wasn't/isn't exactly good living afterward with the Great Leap Forward, the Holomodor and the Cambodian political genocide along with what's going on Venezuela is pretty representative of how socialism always ends up. As for the USSR, Nazi Germany was able to do most of the same things in relation to building up the German economy after the Weimar Republic and the German economy collapse after the Great Depression . they even created some of the first rockets. That doesn't mean their economy was stable, as it relied on a constant war machine churning in order to power it, which in turn decreased the usefulness of their economic infrastructure used to build said machines. The problem with the Soviet Union is pretty similar: they over invested in military and scientific endeavors and not enough in the actual economy. That's why food shortages were a thing that happened fairly often in the USSR and isn't a common occurrence in Western Europe and the US after the Great Depression. If they followed even a mixed model system and actually allowed some parts of the market to be privatized and invested more in their economic infrastructure, there's no doubt that with the amount of natural resources the USSR had it wouldn't have collapsed so soon nor wold economic problems be widespread. China is a testament to that fact.

>interesting debate mixed with interesting bait
Sup Forums really is the best Sup Forums

Capitalist by day, but anarcho-syndicalist by night. It's basically the samre thing, but they are more open about wanting to fuck the goyim over.

Shalom

Communism is the kill people who disagree until it starts working ideology. Which never works, because you don't have ovens big enough to fit the entire population of earth sans yourself.

Kid that's not reality, nor a female for that matter. It's like telling your kid that Santa is real and playing along. It's the same with women. No one "hates women" or what ever they were told on TV. It's like when you play lets pretend with your kids, same thing when I play lets pretend with my wife. We do it out of love, not to be mean. I just think you're looking at it backwards, that's all. Besides if it was really true she wouldn't need you to say it, she can do it herself (thank you very much). XD

Funny that you'd lump all these things together and put Khmer Rouge (get people out of the cities, execute people with poor eyesight for being "unreliable" and doctors to cure all diseases) that was supported by the US (one of the anti-Vietnam war generals who called for intervention was laughed at) on top of it. Also, if you are so keen on famine deaths under communist-wannabes, you might want to research the famine topic in general, you'd be suprise
I agree on mixed capital though. State is great at building large-scale infrastructure projects projects that might not be profitable in long time but sluggish and inefficient on a smaller scale and consumer market. Also, USSR tried that in second half of the 80s, but it was too late. Then 90s followed teaching a great lesson on how NOT to do privatisation.

Oh man, those jews! Invented Zionism for themselves and Marxism for the rest!

t. brainlet, but well meme'd.

>Capitalism is literally the just wait™ ideology.
kek

Yeah, US foreign policy is among the worst in the world because we give dictatorships that abuse their people to no end a slap on the wrist or even help them in some cases and people that actually keeping a region stable are ousted by the CIA. What else is new at this point? We've helped the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan against the Soviets, which backfired on us in the form of Al-Qaeda and ISIS.

Also, I'm keen on famine deaths under socialist regimes because it was a group of a handful of famines that happened relatively close together that killed about 70,000,000 people and I noticed they all were following socialist dogma. I know that there were famines like the ones during the religious wars in Germany in the 1500s that aided in making those wars kill 15,000,000 people , but I find it interesting that when a state centrally plans what the farmers should plant and that plan backfires ridiculously, it's suddenly not a fault of Communist/socialist dogma when said states proclaim to be at the very least socialist in nature.

>t. brainlet, but well meme'd.
He's not wrong. Murder is the solution to the situation where someone says 'no I don't want to share'.
You need to have power over someone to get them to share without their permission, and when you have power over someone you don't need to share. Ever.

it's poettering in a wig

>Capitalism is literally the just wait™ ideology.
Isn't this literally backwards?

No other ideology has been implemented as successfully

Cute! Man or woman, would fuck.

I don't get the image.

As someone who actually went to several communist countries including USSR, you're fucking retarded

The common people had very shitty lives even in the large cities

capitalism is now a cool communist buzzword and has nothing to do with the free market or property rights, but obviously the average person is retarded and anyone who takes politics or economics seriously is also retarded

Are you implying that China is an unsuccessful state?

wtf I love trannies now?

>TFW you get mogged by a trap

They've become more capitalistic since Deng Xiaoping's reforms really. It's possible to own a private business in China and make a profit selling a product. They're only really communistic in name only.

""""""""""""""Hacker""""""""""""""
>Couldn't exploit a stack overflow with an executable stack if "her" life was dependant on it
Love this meme

Because modern programmers want be another urban tribe with special attention

I can copy code from stack overflow though

I never really get the argument of ideologies.

If we remove the buzzwords, what are we really arguing?

Are we arguing against planned economies? Are we arguing for completely naturalistic economies? Are we only talking about them in their pure form? Where does purity end? For example, is a society still capitalist if the state uses it's military to enforce laws? That doesn't seem like a truly free market to me, because in a truly free market the winners of the market should be able to buy up all the resources of force and exploit the market for themselves.

Honestly anybody who argues about "communism" or "capitalism" being shit is just a brainlet who cannot have meaningful discussions beyond ideological bullshit.

I argue from the standpoint that socialism has been implemented time and time before and the majority of them have failed and collapsed the nation in the process. The ones that still exist have moved towards a more free market and are only really socialist in name and the only two that are truly socialist are in the process of collapse in the case of Venezuela or a dictatorial nightmare like N. Korea. Capitalism isn't the end all be all best economic system, but it's eons better than the alternative in socialism/communism.

/thread

this
economic automation will make communism possible