Technology cannot replace humans. Information travels to, and is processed by the human brain at the speed of the light. Regardless of how fast our processors get, they will never be able to achieve switching at light speed. The nature of flip flops and transistors prevents this.
Let's also consider that human optics perceive an infinite resolution, and an infinite number of color possibilities within the visible spectrum. This is another impossibility for robots, due to the nature of digital electronics. A computer would have to be purely analog to perceive detail as well as a human.
Lastly, computers cannot achieve true abstraction. We use abstraction as a buzzword in programming, but true abstraction is completely free and unstructured. The complete opposite of a computer program.
> God is the greatest programmer of all time and you will never beat him > Learn to program in DNA
>Information travels to, and is processed by the human brain at the speed of the light. You don't have the SLIGHTEST idea of how brains work, do you?
Benjamin Perez
>Implying 'robot's don't believe in god.
Jonathan Perez
>Information travels to, and is processed by the human brain at the speed of the light LOL >human optics percieve an infinite resolution false, its arroun 600 megapixels >a computer would have to be purely analog to percieve detail as well as a human not true, our brain uses symplification and drops unnecessary information all the time, thats why we dont have perfect memories, because our "storage" is simplistic and neural signals in the brain are actually digital (in the sense that they can be reduced to 1's and 0's, a neuron either fires or it doesnt) >Lastly, computers cannot achieve true abstraction. We use abstraction as a buzzword in programming, but true abstraction is completely free and unstructured. Animal behaviour is automatic, human behaviour is also a computer program, albeit analog in essence, you seem to forget that the approach to the quality of a computer is effectivity, how efficient the computer is at solving tasks, not how intrincate or beautiful the functioning is
> God is the greatest programmer of all time and you will never beat him > Learn to program in DNA True, DNA is infinitely more powerful than semconductor transistors, it outputs no heat, work in huge blocks (a.k.a cores), doesnt need a cache since enzimes themselves are able to reintegrate DNA strands after being processed, its an inherently digital process far more scalable and pararelizable than sylicon, problem is that its not as reliable, there are misshapens all the time when dna gets duplicated, you would need to have a form of making DNA more reliable before it being apt for computation, but if what you suggest is that DNA has inherently more potential than semiconductors and that given infinite time a purely biological optimization process would yield better payoffs than the most powerful processors in the universe, then yeah I agree
Your arguments are trash tho
Logan Martin
Why are these threads even allowed on Sup Forums?
Matthew Foster
>neural signals in the brain are actually digital You're an idiot.
Luke Davis
low activity: neuron on standby peaks: neuron shoots
the neural network is a digital network, its simply doesnt rely on information processed and decoded inside a neuron, it cares about if it continues the strand or it doesnt.
It can be reduced to a series of logic gates with the caveat that they are prone to error unlike semicondutor "digitalness"
literally what i am saying, the connectome model is a digital model
Juan White
But what's going on at the noise floor?
Benjamin Adams
That's cute, but no. Even the article you ripped that image from said that neuroscientists argue over this shit constantly haven't been able to prove it either way.
Ryan Lee
magnetism, neuron's bodily functions, static charge and possible quantum effects
Christian Murphy
no retard, what they are discussing is if the neuron signals themselves are are digital or analog (as in its a defined charge that they ouput or where of the peaks come from), here we are talking about the neural network itself, which is epifenomaically digital and thus can de replicated by digital models, such as the connectome
We are 100% sure nowadays that the neurons themselves dont store or process information in any inherently analog way such as neurons storing enzimes and lipids on their tails or having case sensitive neuroreceptors built in, neurons work on networks, which can be based off strands which make them digital, or quantum effects which make them qdigital
Jordan James
>God There is no such thing as a "God".
Luke Howard
>walk 20 feet away from your computer monitor >you can no longer read the text on the screen
nice infinite resolution
Christopher Ortiz
observe real life object under microscope.
no pixels. infinite resolution.
Nicholas Barnes
you are conflating clarity with resolution.
Ayden Young
that's not changing the resolution of your eyes, retard
Noah Gray
that's because eyes don't have a resolution. eyes perceive the actual real world, which has an infinite resolution.
Ian Rodriguez
Eyes perceive it quite badly though, upside and only a tiny fraction of your actual "vision". What you "see" is the model your brain has developed of the world fed by the snippets of information it gets from the sensory organs. You won't notice "pixels" (more generally, limitations of the eye) for the same reason you don't notice all the noise in your eye or blind spots until you "trick" yourself.
Logan Cook
U cant measure the speed of thought, nimbus
Cooper Brooks
You can't measure the speed of thought, but it cannot be faster than the speed of light in axons, or in dendrites, or even synapse throughput.
Wyatt Long
Yeah go post this on /sci/ and get wrecked
Elijah Kelly
You're all so delusional, AI will not beat humans at any point because we can't even comprehend how we proceed thoughts.
Brody Bailey
you say our brains process things at the speed of light yet no matter can move at the speed of light or else it will nuke everything in the nearby area
Throw a baseball at even 90% the speed of light you wouldnt have a town anymore
Throw a grape at 90% the speed o light the same would happen but worse as it would act like a hydrogen bomb from the water inside of it
If electrical signals moved through our brain at the speed of light then humans would have to be gods or extremophiles to survive that, of which we are neither.
