Ladies and gentlemen, this is Ryzen aka Sandy Bridge 6 years later

Ladies and gentlemen, this is Ryzen aka Sandy Bridge 6 years later.

>1400 >1200 >literally cheaper than sandy bridge processors than when sandy bridge was released
Nice bait user.

They'd better be after 6 years.

>faster than Sandy Bridge despite being clocked 400mhz slower

Really jumpstarts the juices, user.

And how long did sandy bridge last?

Well they both are soldered and better than any of the current Intel offerings so.

>And how long did sandy bridge last?
We don't know yet.

SOPA DELICIA

good luck finding ryzen 3 that can do 4 ghz

...

UMA DELICIA

>barely beating a 6yo 2500k
What an utter fucking failure Ryzen is.

>g-g4650 is as good as 2500k i promise
BTFO

Why are you comparing processors priced against the i3 to an i5?

I'm baffled. Especially since you're implying this is a bad thing. Have you compared the launch prices?

Have you compared the half a decade gap between them?

Can you put newer intel chips on this comparison?

4cores vs 4cores why wouldn't you compare them? OP is a faggot but 2500k to 1200 or 1400 isn't much of an upgrade is the point. 1600 or 1700 is way to go or better wait for Zen2

2500k vs 7600k wouldn't be much different at same clocks either. 6 core 8700/8600k would be way to go on an Intel upgrade path

>being a retarded faggot

Why don't these bait charts ever include current Intel processors?

You can get sandy bridge era hardware for free these days. Upgrading from one quad core to another quad core is generally not the smartest idea, unless you rely on specific features.

>Using video game benchmarks to measure CPU performance
Congratulations, you are a literal retard. CPU performance means shit all unless you're GPU bottlenecked which you're never going to be unless the only game you play is CS 1.6 at 640x480

t. AMDfag

Lol and some user was asking if it was time retire his 2500k few days ago.

Good argument, goy! Keep buying overpriced housefire CPUs so you can get a single extra FPS in your video games!

Well it did make you show your true colors, didn't it?

Yep, I'm an AMDfag because I don't have a double digit IQ and knows what a margin of error is

10% clock for clock.

So basically the same as Intel's current processors.

...

>double digit IQ
Pretty sure you're into single digits.

delid this

Okay, then please enlighten me on why I'm wrong and why CPU performance in games matters when the difference between a G4560 and 7700k is within the margin of error when you're not being GPU bottlenecked

You wouldn't upgrade from a $150 processor to a $100 precessor, except for odd scenarios

So how about non-k kaby lakes eh?

Most modern Intel CPUs will also lose to a 4.4ghz overclocked 2500K in gaming

GTA V is a game. Minimum frame rate is a thing.

dx12 is a meme

>this is what r/amd actually believes

So how do locked 7th gen i5 stack up, hmm?

t. sopa eater

If it makes you sleep at night.

is this true? I've been saving money to upgrade my i5 2500k to a 1600, is it not worth?

>dx11 benchmark vs dx12 benchmark
WOW AMD BTFO

I'm sure we were discussing your idiotic claim that and I quote "Most modern Intel CPUs will also lose to a 4.4ghz overclocked 2500K in gaming"
DX11 vs DX12 has nothing to do with that.

Name a $110 Incel CPU that has better single or multi-threaded performance than a 2500K at 4.4GHz.

>I don't have a double digit IQ and knows what a margin of error is
>I knows
Kill yourself you negative IQ-having retarded fuck.

How about Intel product line of locked cpus? Or i3s? I'm pretty sure most Intel cpus are locked and i3s sell the most.

But he's right. MOST modern Intel CPUs will lose to an overclocked 2500K. How does posting a chart comparing a handful of top end newer Intel chips disprove his claim in any way? MOST Intel CPUs includes everything from garbage tier Atoms up. There are far more that'd get wrecked by the 2500K than would beat it.

msrp, or actual buy price?

MSRP, faggot. Anybody can say they bought a 7700K for $10 on eBay.

>i5
>top end

this one GPU bottlenecked video game has sure convinced me OP I will now be trashing all my AMD hardware and building a high end X299 system

>all my AMD hardware
There's no helping you, you're too far gone.

Every amd benchmark have been gpu bottlenecked thus far, but now it bothers you?

My 2500K is sitting at 4.9GHz stable, do I need to upgrade or wait?

it bothers me if it's deliberately taken out of context.

pic related is also tested with a 1080. the 7700k gets three (3) FPS over the 2500k. is that all Intel has achieved in 6 years?

>1080p
Kill yourself.

Wait for 7nm.

literally the exact same benchmark as OP you dumb low IQ turd

if we go to 1440p or 4k we will get a flat fucking line because it'll be even MORE of a GPU bottleneck

can't wait for summer Sup Forums to end

>low end chip matches or outperforms high end chip of 6 years ago

I don't see the problem?

>MUH GAYMS

why people even bother to answer to a shill thread?
the absolute lowest of amd beats the absolute low of intel
call me suprised

because there are genuine newfags who will eventually take shit like this seriously

I mean in a way it's funny but at the same time not really

Isn't TW just using two cores anyway?

Can't blame the CPU for some games still running on antique tech...

Yeah and if you put a 7600/7700 on that list it will perform similar to those cpus as well. This has been tested and proven over and over.

No one buys, or sells the i3-7350k for msrp though.

>FX 8150/8350 matching/surpassing 2500k respectively
The housefire 9590 shitting on the 5960x really got my giggles.

Old, outdated tech tends to be cheap, yes.

Find a site selling the 7350K for $110.

Bulldozer is better than intel these days

Why do you guys keep fucking replying to these retarded shill threads? Quit giving him (You's).

This.
OP is a faggot, post fat butts.
Also s4g3.

kill yourself

strange how close it comes though

Can anyone tell me what video decoding capabilities Ryzen has?

Like H264, H265, VP9 8 or 10 Bits?

Just H264.

Encoding was a huge failure on Ryzen.

>cpu doesn't have gpu features
Wow, what a failure...

There is no reason to upgrade from any i5 or i7 to ryzen unless you need more cores.