Linux is only free if your time is worthless

Linux is only free if your time is worthless.

There is a difference between free as in libre and free as in gratis, user.

And even when we're talking about free as in gratis, for some applications you can perform a given task faster in Linux than in Windows. I use both, each OS has it's strengths and it's weaknesses.

Linux isn't free. I had to pay $1.54 for it.

Windows is only free if your privacy is worthless.

Said the guy who just spent 2 hours waiting for windows update to finish.

Than your retarded.

which seagate is that?

/thread

>tfw gahnoo / linocks just werks

>tfw new version of firefox/chromium/openoffice/icedtea/you decide to merge something new and have to rebuild half of your packages

Underrated & appreciated.

>tfw cloveros has binaries

>using source-based distros if your time matters

Implying I need more time to do anything on Linux than on any other OS.

>Linux is only free if your time is worthless.
Some retard that was too stupid to use/learn Linux came up with that phrase.

actually really good quote

I get paid to use linux, get fukt

only if you use gentoo, another source-based distro, or arch

>Implying you need less time to do anything with just a kernel than with an entire OS

nice meme dude

>GNNNNUUUUUU

it takes me around an hour to set up arch to a usable state if i consider myself oaid min wage this means arch costs me 7 dollars as compared to 100 for windows

what's the point in using mint or other bloated shit
there is no point in using linux unless you do minimal install and configure everything to your liking

I bought an Ubuntu disc off eBay. It's cheaper than buying an entire set of blank DVDs that are useless anyway because the built-in DVD burner doesn't work.

>what is usb boot disk?
Still retarded, and I'm a different person from