yeah run my face through it
>>62338182
Damn my bed smell of fart and piss
>2017
>still falling for dumb clickbait articles blowing dumb gimmicks out of proportion
All females are 60% lesbian and 30% asexual and 10% straight for pay.
>2017
>dismissing sound science as baseless
prepare your anus user
t. gay
You really think people can't tell?
That stupid relies on obvious things like manicured facial hair, effeminate facial expressions and dyed hair.
People are actually really good at detecting gays, it's an instinctual thing.
I always thought it was just the cock breath that gave it away
the point is computer can master this so-called gaydar instinct. that's an impressive feat since it's not exactly an obvious thing to program
>Not being a slob makes you gay
So this thing is going to have a lot of false negatives (slobbish fags) and false positives (neat heteros)
And what about the guys who fuck men but "aren't gay"
>detect gender
>detect lots of characteristics not associated with that gender
Will this AI be able to tell whether these two here are gay?
>what about the guys who fuck men but "aren't gay"
>aren't gay
Idk about that. I get called a fag all the time, despite having no interest in men.
>put thrusters on pod
>land on moon
>theguardian
>any online clickbait journalism
>science
pls, piss
She's cute
As if everyone didn't already know
this. i want more. also, don't care if it's a dude. just want more
Nothing gay about two bros practicing their kissing techniques on each other for later use on hot babes.
I'd care, but I don't think she is a dude
are you sure
> Statistics applied to large labeled data sets can result in statistical means...
> News at 11
> Not Artificial Intelligence
> Big data + statistics
> mfw things change and these dumb systems don't.
deep learning can work on things that change
God damnit
>that's an impressive feat since it's not exactly an obvious thing to program
you're a fucking fagot and you should fucking kill yourself
it's half an hour in caffe if you don't know what you're doing, plus maybe 2 hours of tumblr scraping.
>he bases his understanding of science off what he reads on the guardian
Show an AI enough pictures of people with information stating them to be fag or notfag, and eventually it will find similarities based on that characteristic.
It's Emily Grey, you fags. A girl (female) who you can go watch get fucked on the porn site of your choice. Sadly, by white guys only.
Awesome I thought as much
>sound science
>AI
Underrated.
All well and said I don't think we need an AI to know the answer though.
>Muh science
>Shitty The Guardian articles that report random meaningless machine learning experiments for views
>>>/Ifuckinglovescience/
...
It's funny because you aren't being ironic
>The research found that gay men and women tended to have “gender-atypical” features, expressions and “grooming styles”, essentially meaning gay men appeared more feminine and vice versa.
Fucking false. 99% of gays are not feminine at all, they dislike women so they are attracted by masculinity and tend to not groom as feminine.
Female + penis > women
t. girl(male) insecure in xir transsexuality (mental illness) and homosexuality (gay)
>>>/tumblr.com
The girl is emily_grey on chaturbate and Emily Grey on pornhub
>no tits.
how is this even a turn on.
oh wait....
This is Sup Forums
horriable taste.
>99% of gays are not feminine at all
I bet you never leave your room.
the results were exclusively from dating sites so things are biased heavily (the 'straight' average looked like a round sack of shit, the 'gay' average looked like the average man), the 'gay' average leaned more fem because they dominate dating sites/apps and are much more open about their sexuality
OPs on Sup Forums usually post their relatives. It must be OP's sister or mother on the picture.
Whatever I immediately corroborated the observation about lesbians having small foreheads and gays having large foreheads.
I was kind of excited to throw pictures at this algorithm but they haven't released it.
this paper has been roundly criticized but aside from the ethical issues of publishing papers claiming to out gay people, the data they train (AND TEST) on are all dating profile pictures. as in if you've ever seen a photo of yourself and said "nah, that looks kinda gay" and removed it from your tinder/whatever profile, then you self-selected out a photo based on how you looked. which means that all this study really for sure tells us is about how gay people and straight people tend to prefer to present themselves in online dating platforms.
this might as well have concluded that gay dudes are just shirtless torsos at a disproportionately higher rate than straight dudes are.
>tfw this is how America turns into a one party state
also we really should talk about the ethics here, but even if you ignore it, the straight up methodological issues are really retarded. training and testing on the same dataset without removal is such a basic thing that i'm amazed it got published.
>face-scan required to vote
>only allows faggots to vote
More like 75% of the Republican reps are outed as being homosexual, the majority of their base starts a civil war, and well... you know what happens next.
Must be.
>be Republican
>can't vote
>not gay enough.
how ever on a ligher note it might persude people to dress better IMO.
is that Gal Gadot
this
>girl (female)
My boner is gone.
>sound science
(clearly, based on your post) you wouldn't know sound science if it was dance up and down naked in front of you whacking its big fat cock in your faggot face.
>generalising
i was about to stop reading
but then I realised I'm more or less exactly what you described
what the fuck
>A new means the establishment and media can fabricate slander against someone just because their machine said so
I don't like this future
>we're gonna get confirmation whether or not traps are actually gay
Of course I am OP.
>91% success rate
>clickbait
fucking lazy fucks that's paper.
more like Guy Gadot heh heh heh
you could literally guess straight every time and it'd be higher than 91%
Please tell me that beauty has a penis?
>literally
If you're so sure of your baseless claim, why don't you publish a paper backed by rigorous statistics to prove that their RNN is useless?
why her tits are missing?
My favourite part is that they composited all the faces together to create an average gay and heterosexual face.
>yfw they don't release the technology due to PC culture and wanting to respect someone's
>p r i v a c y
I think they just created a chad/virgin/stacey/???? detector.
why are heteros so fat wtf
>developed and tested on the same data set
Wow, it's fucking nothing.
>by white guys only.
mine too
How to upload image? I need to know if I'm gay or not.
just google Emily Grey and you'll find out
:^)
>New AI can guess whether you're gay or straight from a photograph
I guess Peter Thiel is having a hissy fit right about now
Where do I get the code
>lesbo hotter than hetero female
come on
>the average lesbian is not a disgusting butch dyke, instead is actually pretty cute
I knew my yuri and video games weren't lying.
>jews will use this meme to make people believe they're gay
>not a butch
>The research found that gay men and women tended to have “gender-atypical” features, expressions and “grooming styles”, essentially meaning gay men appeared more feminine and vice versa.
Is that Paul Latza on the gay male?
>when bears are your fetish
;-^)
>tfw 28yo (virgin) and still havent told a single living soul about it irl
>family will honorkill me if they find out
n-no
pussy
save them all that trouble and kys
nigga just fuck an escort and be done with it
>tfw my face is a composite of the composite gay and straight faces
robots deathsquads that kills fags when?