What did Stallman mean by this?

What did Stallman mean by this?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/RVsB07CcSNw
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I'm with him. I'm commemorating Pinochet as well.

>He doesn't know that 9/11 is an inside job

Did you know that in Chile they don't teach children how awful life was during the Allende regime?

We could do with some physical removal just about now.

you mean how it's always been? lel

>take texas flag
>fuck it up a little
>"this is mine now"
hahaha nice ````country''''

>which killed President Allende
The asshole killed himself.
Also how the fuck are people still salty about Pinochet, Chile is literally the wealthiest country in South America right now. Almost like getting rid of communists actually works

SEPTEMBER 11TH, NINETEEN-SEVENTEEN-THREE
THEY CAME BEARING THE TORCH OF FREEDOOOM~

>protip
Stallman is ALWAYS right

Lemme tl;dr you guys.
There was this guy called Allende that had communist values, he didn't know how to run a country though he had some nice ideas, so everything started going to shit, so it was time for someone to step in, here comes Pinochet, while he saved Chile from some incoming hell, he did way more than he should and killed a shitload of innocent people and was pretty much fucked up in the head, nowadays the general consensus is pretty much "neutral" but we're all glad this was a thing of the past.

He's against free skydiving lessons.

could you provide a link?

Damn that nigga Pinera is getting too excited about robbing you chilangos again

>innocent
>people
Communists aren't people, user.

most of them were "assumed" communists man, sure, communists are some bitches but there's no reason to kill someone just beacuse you think he's a communist, it's like the witch accusation.

>wanted to nationalize key industries and stop american corps sucking the whole country dry
>yes bubbale, he was an awfully bad no good ebil gommunist, good goy

There's literally no reason to assume the same policies that haven't worked for any other country in South America (or for that matter anywhere else) would've worked in Chile.

Stallman is commie scum. This is the man freetards worship.

>nowadays the general consensus is pretty much "neutral"
I wish.

>stallman is retarded
>also a commie
Hmm

Free software is itself a leftist movement. Sad that Sup Forums is still so cucked

what the fuck did I just read

>nowadays the general consensus is pretty much "neutral"
lmao, no

He's a fucking commie. Pretty much every leftist government in South America in this time period was being backed by the KGB and we actually had proof in Allende's case.

Russia wanted puppets to pressure the US and when they actually did it in Cuba we had the missile crisis. Still, every single leftist complains about the CIA without ever acknowledging what the KGB did.

Pinochet pretty much saved Chile and made it into the best country in South America.

Well, it seems like Pinochet really did nothing wrong

>it's now run by marxists
Fuck. Where did it all go so wrong?

GPL: Left authoritarian
MIT/BSD: Left libertarian

>Pinochet pretty much saved Chile and made it into the best country in South America.

He systematically killed and or tortured anyone who spoke up against his dictatorship, I'm no fan of communism but this guy was a classic fascist dictator placed there by the US, no better than say Kim Jong of North Korea. The US has a lot of blood on their hands.

I'm not saying killing people is good or that he was a good guy. I'm saying the economic prosperity Chile has now comes from his economic policy and the country would be shit if Allende was left in place.
Also only 3000 people died during his dictatorship (20 years).

More like...
GPL: Left libertarian
MIT/BSD: Fucking anarchy

I knew a Chilean guy once. He was at total retard afraid of microwaves. I just assume you're all stupid guinea pig eating spics now.

>and made it into the best country in South America.

The only south american country that can be called good by civilized standards is Uruguay

They should change their name to Urufag

>no better than say Kim Jong of North Korea.
Compare north korea to south korea, then compare venezuela to chile.

Why dont socialist retards notice the glaringly obvious disparity in wealth and prosperity between socialist and capitalist nations? NK/SK is the most clear example, but by no means the only one.

The only answer to that question is that liberalism is a mental disorder. (I'm not denying pinochet was a dictator, just that chile is demonstrably better off under capitalism than socialism)

This. 9/11 was a self defense situation

except chile got the flag 20 years earlier

>The US has a lot of blood on their hands.
This is a useless "dramatic" statement because everybody does.

yo y u defendin da white colonialist oppressors, dawg; didntu kno the natives and sheeit were livin in harmony?

You are literally retarded if you think pure Dictatorship (Chile under Pinochet, North Korea) is somehow socialism.

I mean seriously have you never cracked open a book on political philosophies, not even for schoolwork ?

I'll forever be mad at whitey for making delicious brown women wear clothes, but otherwise people really gotta chill with the theatre shit.

Huh. That still doesn't explain why I just found an open fileserver with 1000s of Chilean credit cards, passports, and licenses.

I met an american once, he was pretty dumb. I just assume you're all borderline retarded now.

Here, let me help you out, Chilean brainlet. Forgot to quote me.

>Pretty much every leftist government in South America in this time period was being backed by the KGB
yeah what about all those puppet usa goverments?

Wanted to give foss software one more shot next week, but now I'm staying with proprietary microsoft shit.

>thing of the past
>still a centrist shithole

I don't think he intended to

"he"

>removing a thousand communists is bad
>letting them take over, destroy the country and murder millions is better
>this is what leftists actually believe

Sup Forums should do something nice to commemorate Pinochet too.

You're a fucking retard, man. Seriously. Dictatorships are not economic systems.

b-but user, economy was made up by evil imperialist capitalists to oppress the working class

No goy, bad goy, don't listen to the evil man, america is the light, the force of good!
Everything you do is just, the bombs you throw at other countries are magical and can't hurt innocent people and any democratic president you topple is using poison gas and other AWFUL things against his own people!

A good goy changes the world for us. A bad goy questions and does nothing, while these awful people do the things we claim they do!
Oy vey!

Just when I thought I couldn't love him any more

I hate to be a conspiracy theorist but between the innate likelyhood of things like kangaroo courts and banana republics in these underdeveloped shitholes there is no means to establish economic prosperity. Communism is the closest they can get to a reasonable distribution of wealth, and at that point it becomes incredibly dilute.

Once you involve corporate interests it's well along the lines of reason that those very same corporations would (and have) established leaders and political campaigns to manipulate the peoples of these countries. So maybe it's not that communism has failed but more that capitalists have quashed any means for it to prosper.

It amazes me how people can idolize Pinochet at the same time as they condemn Kim Jong Un. I fucking despise Americans. I hope the hurricane tears your entire country apart. This is why the entire world hates you.

No but do you have any idea what you're talking about though?

He didn't just step in out of nowhere. Milton Friedman had something to do with the matter as well.
youtu.be/RVsB07CcSNw

Oh no, the 3/4 of the underdeveloped globe resents us and the remaining 1/4 hates everyone else on some arbitrary basis. What the fuck does anyone care, or does anyone actually care at all? We still all do business, fight wars together, share defense, communicate, so what does it matter exactly?

>So maybe it's not that communism has failed but more that capitalists have quashed any means for it to prosper.
If your ideology needs a safe space to work, maybe it deserves to fail.
The world is not polite, nor it is fair. Capitalism is so successful because it manages to utilize even the worst human traits to its advantage, while communism assumes a certain level of good faith and is easily corrupted, as was shown numerous times in practice.

>HE'S A TYRANT BUT HE'S OUR TYRANT
>OH NO, HE GOT DA WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION!!

At least pinochio got to retire

"assumed" as in mccarthy assumed?
Except pinoched actually did his job