techpowerup.com
>JewFail i7 8700K is just measly 100 points higher than RyZen 1600 (non-X) in CineBench
>RyZen is 3.2GHz on stock
>Inturd i7 8700K is 3.7GHz with dry horse cum under the lid
>This TRASH will retail for 380$ minimum
>Meanwhile, non-X RyZen 1600 is roughly 215$
Y AREN'T U BUYING IT, Sup ForumsOY!? YYYYY~!!!!!111??
Other urls found in this thread:
phoronix.com
caml.inria.fr
github.com
gamersnexus.net
youtu.be
youtube.com
twitter.com
>CineBench
...
>oops my ddr4 ram can't run at its rated speed
>oops segfault
Not an argument.
>segfault
Are you one of those uneducated retards? Again?
phoronix.com
>My DDR4 RAM can't run at it's rated speeds
Was fixed already.
>Segfault
Was fixed already.
But nice try anyway. At least you've tried.
So this is an """""(((argument)))""""" then, huh?
caml.inria.fr
Oy vey, goy.
Say HIS name.
Say it LOUD and CLEAR.
You KNOW you WANT TO.
>AMD's segfault problems were already completely solved
>Meanwhile Intel has system-crashing segfaults with Skylake and Kaby Lake even today
Holy shit, how Intel's brainless shills will ever be able to recover from this (protip: they can't. They've been completely and absolutely BTFO'd)?
...
THANK YOU BASED JIM
...
...
SKEW THE SKUS EVERY YEAR FOR MAXIMUM PROFIT.
Goyim, I...
I'm not Goyim you clutz, now GET BACK TO WORK, or we'll replace you with Debora Shoquist already.
"Work? What is that?"
"RyZen has segfault"-kiddies are eternally BTFO
Acktually Jensen is competent (well besides occasionally going full retard trying to make the biggest GPU possible).
>noVideo
>Competent
>Ever
Nice try, but no cigar
>Pretending he's not a Sup Forumsoymer
t. Raja Koduri
t. pajeet
dat single core speed
why can't ryzen OC one single core like that?
JIM "KIKERIPPER" KELLER
Try harder (unless you're saying it sarcastically, that is).
>we fixed it (probably) but we won't tell you if you are affected
>the only way to find out is for you to actually trigger to bug with steps which aren't reliable
>you may lose data in the process, so better don't try it
>even if you can reproduce, we will not make it easy for you to initiate a RMA-procedure, instead we are going to ask for totally irrelevant data first
poo-in-loo-tier customer service
...
>we fixed it but we won't tell you if you are affected
Are you a retard? They LITERALLY say how to spot a processor from the batch which had the issue, and how to differentiate between the "fixed" and "problematic" batches, WHILE they provide FREE RMA for the fixed ones. You are a goddamn dumbass. I seriously don't even know what the fuck I'm responding to such utter imbecile as you.
no, they didn't.
KYS
you first, lying scumbag
...
>replying to Brian
>*autistic screeching*
pls
amd-shills still lying, it's sad.
>week 25 and anything before week 25 is affected
>week 30 and further are fully fixed
>week production number is on the CPU
>no they didn't
This is what we have to deal here with, folks. Literal inept imbecility, IQ less than/equal to 21 points.
all this info is made up shit by amd-fans.
it is nowhere to be found in official AMD-documentation or RMA-pages.
get fucked.
I paid $330 NZD for a shitty 4c/4t last year. I hope Intel kikes rot in hell.
You were just BTFO, deal with it.
With lies? I don't think so.
>It's over Avi...it's...it's all over
>>Oyyyyyyyy....
>Phoronix
>AMD fans
Where is the official press release?
Ryan "The Everlasting Jew Defender" Shrout already got buttblasted so goddamn massively hard by 8700's mindbogglingly underwhelming performance that he started attacking literally EVERYONE and saying that those CineBench nubmers are "wrong" and "fake". You can't become more buttmad than that, folks. Especially because we all know how heavy of Intel-bribed-and-not-even-hiding-it shilling sheeps PcPer are (much worse than even Tom's and TPU combined altogether. The only other "source" that's even worse than PcPer in this regard, is the cocksucking lamer moron Jayz).
>This one simple microcode patch makes Intel shills cry
JEW KILLER
it's the same with ishit users
you talk like a moron
>he attacks anyone who's not a natively English language-speaking person
Well, EXCUUUUUSE ME, PRINCESS!
...
I didn't say it because you were non-english
I said it because you talk like a moron
>hobby OS has problems with hardware
stop the presses!
>A moron tries to call someone else a moron
Oh the irony
I hope Nvidia gets BTFO like this at one point.
...
choke on a nigger's cock faggot
Confirmed for being a moron.
...
AMD won this generation. See you in 2020.
Make that 2022 at the very least, because no one's going to cancel Zen APUs, Zen 2, and Zen 3. And don't forget the STARSHIP™ which will come bundled together with the fully completed version of STAR CITIZEN™. And what's even MORE funny is that STARSHIP™ is not even Zen's final form.
>and saying that those CineBench nubmers are "wrong" and "fake"
Well to be fair you could just wait a bit for more credible benchmarks to pop up. It won't release for another month so it's completely irrelevant what some leak says right now, not that I believe it's wrong.
Even though there's a DIRECT FUCKING VIDEO PROOF OF CINEBENCH RUNNING? Fuck OFF, Ryan. And don't you dare to give me any of that BULLSHIT on "steppings" and other shit. So it's absolutely fine when JewFail does it ON A MATURED PROCESS AND PLATFORM, but it's absolutely unacceptable then COMPLETELY NEW MADE-FROM-SCRATCH IP that is RyZen has some minor launch quirks and irons out all problems with time? FUCK OFF, YOU JEW CUM-DRIZZING SHITSTAIN. PcPer sucks ASS.
That's a nice rant my friend but maybe you should've read my post properly.
Hol up, how do I find out if my 1600 has the segfault? Do I have to take it out and take off the HSF or is there a way that doesn't involve reapplying thermal paste?
>When Indians are so desperate that they spam same thread every 15 minutes pretending muh synthetic benchmarks matter.
All I care about, and all that most people care about, is gaming performance. 25% ahead of 7700k and 50% ahead of Ryzen sounds sweet.
Install gentoo and run github.com
>25% ahead of 7700k and 50% ahead of Ryzen sounds sweet.
Nice meme.
>Cinebench
k
>Cinebench doesn't matter.
Jesus Christ calm your tiddies
Not for my purposes.
The 7700K gets trashed in Cinebench, and yet it dominates gaming. Would you like me to show benches where the R7 gets shat on by Intel chips years old?
You know all of this already. It's just shameless shilling on your part.
(You)
>Youtube Benches
>No source
>Actual websites with actual testing methodology and the credibility to lose show the 7700K doing better in a plurality of games
It's interesting AMD fans are still clinging to individual screenshots when the rest of the Internet disagrees. Even as more recent tests are done as the Ryzen arch has been better optimized for, it still is generally behind, and it's not that close.
I can't imagine the mental world one would have to inhabit to actually have these cherrypicked images available, ready to deploy in the event of AMD heresy.
>how do I find out if my 1600 has the segfault?
Do you have the box? Usually the serial number is printed on there too.
Just count the weeks which have passed since official release. If it's from 5-th to 25-th - you have a problematic one. If it's 30-th week or later - you're fine. Either way, even if you do have a segfaulty older batch one, you can easily RMA it and get a fixed one for free by contacting AMD.
>I can't Google "Ryzen 3600mhz ram" or "Ryzen 3200mhz ram" spoonfeed me!
(You)
>The 7700K
>dominates gaming
Sh-sh-shhh, do-d-d-don't...d-d-dd-do-don't tell-l the go-go-goyims a-a-aa-aa-a-a-about th-the st-st-stt-st-t-stutt-stutters a-a-and 100% l-l-load a-all t-th-the t-t-time.
And yet, it's still behind. Even with recent tests on 3200 RAM.
It's telling that even in the specifically cherrypicked, best case scenario you posted an image of, the 7700K still bests the R7 in a majority of tests.
That there's still a corner of the internet where fanboys still haven't accepted this as a truism is... well I guess not surprising.
I've not seen stutter replicated in any review. If you could show it in testing, much obliged.
The 7700K tends to have higher minimums, from what I've seen recently.
gamersnexus.net
Here's one such review.
The Ryzen chip is running at 3200 RAM.
Both average framerate and 0.1% lows are lower than the 7700K.
>25% ahead of 7700k and 50% ahead of Ryzen sounds sweet
And then you woke up, shill.
>I've not seen stutter replicated in any review. If you could show it in testing
youtu.be
Get fucked, 7700cuck.
If you're too spastic to watch entire video, here's highlights: Intel stutters like fuck in 8 games out of 10, while being loaded on all cores & threads 100% of time with no breathing window at all, while RyZen goes SUPER-smooth and usually has a 5~8% breathing window left (usually loaded to 92~95% on all cores & threads).
...
This was probably running at it's base clock of 3.7 GHz. For some reason, it didn't try to all-core turbo at all, even though it did turbo on one core. Possibly power saving mode was enabled, or something was changed in the BIOS. I'd expect 1355 cinebench points at 4 GHz.
>He sincerely and absolutely unironically believes/thinks that higher FPS counter is what really matters and not much smoother lagless/stutterless playing experience
>GTA V
A known bug in a single game. This was reproduced by GN and is game-specific.
It has nothing to do with CPU horsepower, and is a limitation in the engine. If you put a higher frequency chip in, it can actually perform worse than a lower-clocked chip.
youtube.com
Do you know what 0.1% low means?
>it didn't try to all-core turbo at all, even though it did turbo on one core
Because "new generation" of dry horse cum-sandwiched Inturd processors can't Turbo on all cores any, or it'd create a housefire in seconds. They're now Turbo'ing only to one, maximum two cores tops, just so that they could wave e-peen in synthetic benches while heavily losing to Zen in everything else AND everyday usage. Meanwhile, Zen turbos on all cores & threads absolutely effortlessly.
>If you put a higher frequency chip in, it can actually perform worse than a lower-clocked chip
Which means that 7700K gets BLOWN THE FUCK OUT, thus proving that the 7700cuck is even more of a retard than he makes it seem look like by his inept shitposts.
Ayy
>Benchmark
8700 is clearly a higher number than 1600 , thus its better
...
>Which means that 7700K gets BLOWN THE FUCK OUT
>Game engine can't sustain more than 160 FPS without immediately dropping the frames and causing stutter, because the engine is broken.
>Other games, which aren't using broken engines, don't suffer this issue.
>7700K (and i5), being powerful enough to go over this limit, appears to stutter. Due to GTA V, not the chip.
>"The chip is bad!"
Any stuttering is unrelated to actual 7700K performance. It's a limitation in the engine of a single broken game. You are now grasping at straws.
go sleep loli
Except that heavy stuttering was also experienced in several other games besides just GTA V, in particular the Witcher 3 and Just Cause 3.
Fuck off, you, fucking pedo!
I'm not your fucking """loli"""!
Never heard of that. Feel free to post a link to a review of the issue.
>Product model numbers
380$ is clearly a much higher cost, so it must be better than 1600
>>Segfault
>Was fixed already.
Sadly not for me. Because i'm living in fucking Russia, there is no rma and for shop where i bought it it's not covered by warranty because it works. Now i'm still running my old i5 rig as working pc and new ryzen machine is fuckhuge console in my bedroom with steam in big picture. I was really lookig forward to reducing compiling times.