Less single core perf than a 1600

less single core perf than a 1600
3% faster on multicore of a 1600

Other urls found in this thread:

realworldtech.com/forum/?threadid=136526&curpostid=136666
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

intel 2017

People who use geekbench seriously should be lined up and executed.

LOL PC fags BTFO, iphone 8 gets better single thread score than both CPUs

If you actually believe a ~10w mobile CPU has more single core performance than a 90w+ desktop CPU i've got a bridge to sell you.

post this on Sup Forums and consolefags might actually believe you

If you believe geekbench is worth jack shit then you are the same retard that believe iphone cpus are better than desktops.

It's fine if you want to compare the same architecture.

So if you have two desktop CPUs running the same OS, go ahead and compare away.

But android VS windows? Retarded to compare
iOS vs android? Retarded to compare
Windows vs iOS? Retarded to compare

You simply can't compare cross operating system AND cross architecture (x86 vs ARM) and expect the results to be meaningful.

Well, looks like the memes were right.
Geek bench really is useless, holy shit.

so geekbench still doesnt matter

>just wait till 2020™

geekbench is meaningless when even the 28W i7-7567U gets higher single threads.

>comparing across OS's again

wew its like I just said not to do that.

realworldtech.com/forum/?threadid=136526&curpostid=136666

x86 benchmark is shit. Literally superpi 2.0

>>just wait till 2020™

im sure geekbench will matter once intel surpass finally amd

>Windows 10
>x86 CPU
>Geekbench
>7700K
>6139

Intel already BTFOs AMD in geekbench

OP post is geekbench 3.4.2

Yours is Geekbench 4.0.0

Comparing them directly is meaningless.

...

AMD BTFO. i7 7700k > 1700 in multicore. AMD BTFO AGAIN

Geekbench is meaningless unless you compare chips from the same uarch

Ok pham I got you
>geekbench 3.4.2
>Windows 10
>x86 CPU


ZOMFG still BTFO
Geekbench is useless.

pls delet. geekbench is the ultimate benchmark

>5GHz
>5486


>3.6GHz
>4113

Now lets estimate what the OP would get at 5GHz
4113/3.6 = 1142.5 * 5 = ~5700 estimated

So ~5700 vs your ~5500.

Not to mention it's 6 core.

you are assuming that they will reach 5ghz

It doesn't matter, we're talking relative performance, not every 7700k can hit 5GHz either.

The same thing happens if you do the math the other way to clock the 7700k down to the levels of the 8600k in the OP.

5486/5 = 1097.2 * 3.6 = 3949.92
4113 vs 3949.

Same thing we see when we take it up to 5ghz.