hack me Sup Forums
Hack me Sup Forums
casio a dumb
Actually the Casio is right
>not knowing BEDMAS
>2+1=3
>6/2=3
>3x3=9
Applel is right for once, how the fuck can a calculator made by a company that makes calculators for decades be so shit?
I call bullshit on the Casio one, it's obviously faked, I don't own one, but probably you input that 1 yourself somehow.
Its fake
HACK ME Sup Forums
Hmmm
>there are people on Sup Forums with math "education" that don't know or follow BEDMAS
current state of Sup Forums
kek
The pic was unrelated you ugly cuck faggots, I wanna be hacked.
Then here's one on Android's calculator
>BEDMAS
>not PEMDAS
Sorry. Wrong. Back to r*ddit
>applel
Look again retard
>obviously fake
It depends. See pic related.
If it's written like OP, it's always 9.
If it's written out like in pic related, THEN it's 1.
There's a difference, unless you only have elementary school education.
It's wrong, doesn't matter if it's fake or not. The answer is 9.
I own the exact same casio as OP it says 1 but if i write (6/2)x(2+1) it answers correctly.
Further explanation because Sup Forums is obviously full of 16 year olds.
casio a shit
/thread
You shouldn't rely on a computer to guess what you mean when you type it.
Computers are stupid, like the people who program them.
American education
How are people seriously arguing over this? PEMDAS isn't difficult people. The answer is 9.
It's the same thing m8
This thread is the reason Lisp has the best syntax.
Or Forth; reverse polish notation is objectively the best system and should be taught instead of hideous and impractical infix notation.
...
Literally both of them are correct. Multiplication and division (and +/-) have the same priority in PEMDAS.
Also,
>>>/not-fucking-g/
yes, they are dumb, we know