oh shit you guys complete forgot about my thread so gonna try to pick some interesting comments from the last one to ask more questions about it >my friend also says he has $40,000 of clicks but didn't receive the money gave me a good kek >Clicking on adverts if you don't buy the product is illegal. what >you are retarded for using chrome Using chromium, not ideal but at least something >Yes, it is fake history. Which hides your real history. How is it fake? Let's say we have bigdickpoppas.com and youtube.com both using Google's AdSense, you clicked on the ad from bigdickpoppas.com at 12:42 and then you clicked an ad from youtube.com at 12:45 - AdSense tracks that and boom they have already have history from you browsing those two sites since you [well the extension] have clicked the actual ad - how does that fucking hide your "real" history? >How is clicking on ads supposed to stop them? The only people getting "hurt" by this I could see so far are the actual advertisers, but it won't hurt someone like google
im going to only ask once more because I'm still missing something, how is AdNauseam actually helpful for the user? please no shillpasta thank you with the "jewish propaganda" bs
ah fuck i meant "please no shillpasta with the "jewish propaganda" bs thank you" im tired
Nicholas Reyes
If you are asking about obfuscation, AdNauseam obfuscate your clicks on adverts, not the sites you visited. Simply, it hides your two clicks by making many other clicks, on any other sites, on any other adverts and at any other times. Now they have a million clicks from you and because they don't know which one is real (only two out of the million is you), they cannot track you anymore, or rather, their tracking will become useless.
Julian Thomas
not worth wasting my time with it, i already use add block, haven seen an add in years.
Parker Collins
if you use chrome then you will start seeing ads soon
Tyler Mitchell
why does it use the penis logo?
Wyatt Peterson
>it hides your two clicks by making many other clicks, on any other sites, on any other adverts and at any other times. Considering that it gets ads from the sites that visit, I don't feel like this is hiding anything, quite oppositely just giving them more precise data of my history based on what adverts from what site I clicked.
John Thompson
I want something like adnauseam, but it also visits random sites to actually obfuscate my profile
Lucas Turner
It is not a browsing history blocker, it is ad blocker.
There are other things for blocking your browsing history. Like using a VPN, or Random Agent Spoofer, or TrackMeNot.
William Lee
YOU'RE A GENIOUS user...
But TOR does it, many people use one exit node, much traffic from diffrent people, dont know which one is yours
Liam Allen
> how is AdNauseam actually helpful for the user? It clicks every single tracking ad presented to you, which obfuscates any advertising profile they might have made of you, since now you're equally interested in everything. It also undermines the credibility of advertising services, forcing them to issue refunds and causing advertisers to become more wary of paying money for advertising - which directly undermines the concept of advertising funding websites, and will force them to adapt towards a better model or die. Adblockers are fine, but Adnauseum has the potential to force advertisers to change.
Joshua Taylor
YOU'RE A GENIOUS user...
But TOR does it, many people use one exit node, much traffic from diffrent people, dont know which one is yours. So, basically, just use TOR, there won't be much speed diffrence, bandwith is overloaded with entering those sites anyway.
Gavin Lopez
I just want to devalue my profile to advertisers, not land on the terrorist watch list.
Lincoln Morgan
they know everything about you before they send you ads, thats why you get them in the first place, now let half of these ads be wrong and adnau clicks them, it fucks with them and they dont know what ads to send next
Christopher Bell
>my profile to advertisers Advertisers don't have your browsing history.
Do you even understand we are talking about two things here? Ads and websites are two different things. NdNauseam is for Ads.
Ryan Reed
>Advertisers don't have your browsing history.
As long as the ads are loaded from their servers, they do.
Andrew Cook
Use Random Agent Spoofer
Adrian Hall
If you use Chrome or its reskins Google knows where your mouse cursor is so Adnau is 100% worthless
Isaac Wood
how does that spoof my ip?
Dominic Collins
actually looks like a fingernail
Jonathan Jenkins
maybe for your prepubescent mind
Austin Hill
It doesn't. Use Tor
Logan Parker
nah, you just have a perverted mind go read the Bible
Lincoln Wilson
that was my argument don't copy me
Easton Moore
not an argument
Bentley White
you're veering off track again, i want to obfuscate, not hide. Also Tor is compromised.
Jonathan Fisher
i wasn't arguing, i was telling you to stop copying me
Angel Baker
You said you want to spoof your ip.
Mason King
im not anymore
Sebastian Anderson
ok then apologize and admit my superiority
Parker Lopez
You are not a real men anymore? Did you uninstall your penis?
Josiah Nguyen
God is superior to both of us
William Howard
you said random agent spoofer would prevent tracking
Camden Moore
whatever, you still must prostrate yourself before me
>>The only people getting "hurt" by this I could see so far are the actual advertisers, but it won't hurt someone like google once we kill advertisers google will have no source of income anymore duh
Noah White
Something is wrong, the Google shills are super quiet today.
One wonders how long before all retailers - most of whom are notoriously strapped for revenues and profits courtesy of Amazon - and other "power users" of online advertising, do a similar back of the envelope analysis, and find that they, like RH, are getting a bang for only 2% of their buck? What will happen to online ad spending then? And what will happen to the online ad giants, if the vast majority of ad spending that justified their hundreds of bilions in market cap is exposed as "bloat"? As Friedman politely, yet sarcastically put it, "Googles market cap might go down"...
Blake Green
OP here, thank you for your responses, I'm going to stick with uBlock Origin, though. From all responses it seems that the >As the collected data gathered shows an omnivorous click-stream, user tracking, targeting and surveillance become futile. Point is bunch of fucking bullshit. If it does indeed change advertisers, good on 'em.
Jackson Lopez
At least you tried. You are still being tracked tho even if you block the ads.
