Anyone else notice this today? It appears on a bunch of different wiki pages
Wikipedia is fucked up
Brayden Thompson
Jacob Bell
Well post the shit
Jayden Wright
happened earlier today, too
seems like that guy is murderer
Nathan Gray
Who cares
Sebastian Watson
Someone edited a template. Nothing to see here.
Nolan Barnes
I literally do not care, wtf is wrong with wikipedia - what's the alternative? Pirate most recent / reputable encyclopedia / dictionary for anything and use that instead?
Christian Roberts
You can just grab a copy of Wikipedia (sans media) from their site. It's like. 10 GiB torrent.
Gavin Smith
wikipedia is such fucking trash. they don't document anything interesting, just the bare minimum
Luke Collins
Some turbo autist pizzagate fag wrote a bot that edits wikipedia articles, nothing to see here.
Cameron Russell
It's not only that, but the editors are unreliable and are a bunch of activist homosexuals. Just because they "cite" something doesn't make it okay, because an encyclopedia entry requires you to consider all sides and to write a balanced and timeless article. I grew up with buying actual bookshelves of encyclopedias and kids these days are missing out on quality content thinking Wikipedia is reliable and the truth.
Gabriel Smith
You can't shoot bullets in space
Luis Parker
...
Hunter Clark
>Reading articles about some political issues where peoples opinions matter
kys polcuck
Colton Morgan
Yes you can. Gunpowder contains both fuel and oxidizer, much like solid rocket fuel. Recoil could send you directions you don't want to go, however.
Julian Gutierrez
It looks normal here.
Owen Richardson
Christopher Clark
Not to mention they delete so much average content instead of improving it. Used to edit wikipedia but if you're writing about a fringe topic you can kiss your articles goodbye
Nathaniel Cooper
Basically its some faggot on twitter that will never deliver. Maybe he tried to buy some office space and was denied so he wants to ruin this guy's life.
Ethan Gray
>evidence that suggests
shouldnt evidence PROOF something
Jacob Gray
Every part of wikipedia is shit. Their culture is cancer and discourages new people. The number of editors is declining over the last decade, even as the internet and the number of wikipedia users grows. Surveys show actual experts have been fleeing the site. They let these so called "deletionists" run wild and delete everything they can get away with, purging entire sections of the site.
The organization itself is shit. They desperately beg for donations, but they can't manage the money they have.
Jace Bennett
Any good online alternatives?
Justin Reed
not for paranoid delusional faggots, no.
Tyler Thompson
Damn, too bad.
Liam Carter
not really. No evidence can prove anything. A proof only exist in logic and mathematics. In science and everything that is not logic or mathematics then you can only provide evidence that suggest. The term "proving" in all other cases than mathematics or logical proofs are wrongly used and are just used as a synonym for "evidence that suggest".
No amount of evidence can prove anything. Proofs in mathematics and logic only are proofs because they show how some ideas either fail or correspond to certain axioms. It's a completely different kind of evidence.
A criminal case can not be proven. A criminal might be caught bloody with a knife in his hands, he might admit to killing someone, there might be several wittnesses and even a camera showing him seemingly stabbing someone, but that does not prove anything. There might be scenarios where the person is innocent.
Jaxson Torres
If you don't have a script blocker, you probably have a virus now.