Find one single flaw

Find one single flaw.

Other urls found in this thread:

cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=652&cmp[]=613
cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=652&cmp[]=1668
cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=1668&cmp[]=2984
intel.com/content/dam/support/us/en/documents/processors/mobile/celeron/sb/316964.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>Celeron

>It's a Celeron

>celeron
Bait/10 had to respond

I said find a flaw, not name it.

...

Man those are some inconsistent icons. Really shifts my bits

>Celery Inside

>celeron

Stop chanting its name and tell me ONE FLAW

it's not a Core2

Its slow

It's slow.

>65 nm lithography
>35 W TDP
It's just too old. You gotta be 8 or younger to appeal to Sup Forums.

Alright
>its on a dead socket
>its only 2ghz
>it only has 512kb of l2 cache
>single core even though its Conroe
>it cost 3/4 of a core2duo e6700 at launch

The only upside to it is that it's 35w
But being a Conroe on 775 it came with the same cooler as 65w c2d

It's not a Pentium

Celer mean fast in Latin

>2ghz
That's more than anyone here will ever need, realistically speaking
>it only has 512kb of l2 cache
512 kb of L2 is enough

Basically your only reason is "it's old"

Which is not a flaw of the processor itself

You are right. Time is flawed here. We need to stop it.

Botnet

Ok, even if it was october of 2006 right now, it is a bad choice. Its price to performance value is terrible and youre better off buying pretty much any core2duo, the Celeron struggles with anything more than basic tasks as of 2006 and the core2duo chips are up to a lot more and will last for years to come.
Oh and look how true that is, a core2duo system is still pretty viable for everyday use and light gaming at acceptable frame rates even 11 years later, while single core Celeron and pentium chips are not in the slightest

Tldr the Celeron is shit, launched as shit and there were better options

But ... I had a celeron back then and it worked just fine

>celelron
>botnet
>intlel

cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=652&cmp[]=613

same speed , 1/10th the wattage , dual core

note that these came out at the same time
cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=652&cmp[]=1668

and this what 65w parts can do today
cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=1668&cmp[]=2984

its not a Celeron 300A

>2009
>asked to order a dozen pcs at work on a super tight budget
>order cheapest-ass parts including celeron 440s
>supplier fucks up and gives us dual core 1200s instead
>lets us keep them because disassembling all the pcs is a pita

thus ended my experience with this glorious cpu

weirdly enough, despite shit parts, one of those pcs has been running 24/7 for 8 years now and is still ticking

>one single flaw
i'll do you one better, here is 104 (one hundred and four) flaws
intel.com/content/dam/support/us/en/documents/processors/mobile/celeron/sb/316964.pdf
start at page 16
your welcome

Is it even as good as pic related?

I bet that running 3 or 4 tabs on lagchrome + listening high quality music would be enough to freeze the pc

>thread about an old shit CPU
>not a classic CPU
>not an interesting CPU
>not a CPU that was groundbreaking for its time or special in any discernible way
>just some old middling piece of shit
OP is eternally a faggot