A11 Bionic chip obliterates all other SoC's out there

>%52 faster than 835 Note 8, currently the fastest Android phone

Holy shit brews its not even funny anymore

Other urls found in this thread:

tomsguide.com/us/iphone-8-benchmarks-fastest-phone,review-4676.html
youtube.com/watch?v=ghdTqnYnFyg&t=281
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

tomsguide.com/us/iphone-8-benchmarks-fastest-phone,review-4676.html

>a new phone has a faster processor than older phones
holy motherfucking shit what a surprise

Note 8 was released this month...

THANK YOU BASED APPLE

ANDROID BTFO.

Why is qualcom so shitty at designing chips?

>video editing
>on a phone
Why though? Are people really this tarded?

maybe you want to upload a video you recorded on your phone, with some minor editing

>Holy shit brews

what kind of hot reddit lingo is this?

Why is it so much faster on video editing?

Better software and faster hardware.

hardware encoding

>using reddit spacing

and in the end neither chip will be pushed to their limits and that web page opens up as fast as your 4g connection allows

...

Mac's going ARM when?

When their phone is faster than their almost top of the line laptop.
Gj Apple

This. Apple's chips are full of specific accelerators. It's why it looks good in geekbench. Though I can't say I'm entirely opposed to the approach.

you know that apple has a boost on it when a macbookrpo gets a better score than dell xps

same shit they pulled with iphone 7 literall fastest of them all and yet in real life was slower than a p500

>doesn't know goybench uses the cypher hardware acceleration whenever available so scores are much higher even though the cpu is actually much slower in anything else
please end your life soon

>fastest android phone.
i too have never hear of china

So you're saying there's no point in phones until they get cinebench and handbrake? May as well port sysmark as well.

>not knowing what leddit spacing is

I think 3d marks physics tests are pretty agnostic. There was an article about why geekbench is a terrible indicator of performance because it's basically suited towards Apple's SOCs, consistently of microbenches and hardware acceleration compatible tests. That said Apple's high performance cores are traditionally wide, like Intel's core series so theyre pretty performant

Why can’t cinebench make an iOS version so you faggots can stop whining.

>saying leddit to cover your origin

Moar coars

Too bad you can only do what Apple allows you to do with it.

Workload use gigabyte RAM.

Do phones really need to be this powerful?
What are people doing with their phones anyway other than social media shit, basic apps and internet browsin'

soon we will have proper windows on our phone, then well put the phone in a dock and use it as our home computer

How long until Apple adapts one of their mobile processors into a Macbook? It seems like the low power consumption and good performance, especially for video editing, would make it a good choice. Isn't the A11 already running x64 anyway?

Nigga the Samsung Galaxy Note 8 is like 1 week old.

> (OP)
>Isn't the A11 already running x64 anyway?
No its still 64bit ARM

why are you faggot mixing up video editing with video encoding like its the same thing?
show me that phone running a professional video editing software with proper timeline and preview, you wont because neither you nor it can't!
fucking christ, nu-Sup Forums-'''males'''...

I expect they are working towards this as hard as they can. But the ARM chips will be falling short on a variety of workloads for now. But soon enough, they'll manage to make something that the low-end airs or macbook can manage with.

>not knowing what leddit spacing is
>calls others leddit

fuck off

imovie

will they have a piece of hardware on the chip that translates all the x86 shit on the fly so that you can run x86 applications on it? I don't see them switching to ARM otherwise

>professional
>proper timeline and preview
>imovie
hahahahaha

Some mega iPad Pro, add features Mac OS and software to iOS and release some form factor MacBook run iOS Pro.

it's all of that

I will say the Geekbench is a less than stellar benchmark for testing CPU architectures, but it's pretty good for testing a phone vs another phone.

The test don't run long enough and aren't comprehensive enough to give a more meaningful result, but this does bode very well for Apple.

oh wait, you are serious, let me laugh even harder
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>not taking responibility for his reddit tier writing
>trying to shift the blame
yoyu'll never fit in boy

What are you doing with such a quick CPU in a phone? Whatsapp? Facebook?

>hardware
Why Hardware when software will do?
Nothing in Apple's world still actually requires extensions past SSE4.1, I'm sure a software layer could make the transition work again.
See: m68k to PPC, PPC to x86

They'll do what they did when they moved from PPC to Intel.

It depends on how much power they can get from an ARM CPU, but I fully imagine it'll be software, but the expectation is that applications will be updated for the new ARM future.

>Geekbench
Same as every year then. Apple fanboys will scream out for an ARM MacBook. A few months will pass and nothing will happen. Slowly, surely, people will forget that the geekbench bullshit even existed. Slowly, people will acknowledge that geekbench is ass.

Then the iPhone 8S will be launched, to record breaking geekbench figures, and the cycle will start again, as it always has since geekbench was made. What makes you guys think this time is different?

>Geekbench
Everytime. How are you not banned yet?

how are YOU not banned yet? at least disable your name so people don't realize you sperg everywhere

Lmao it's not just one guy iFag. I just want you gone like everyone else, please stop shitting up the board with your gay fashion accessories

youtube.com/watch?v=ghdTqnYnFyg&t=281

Apple already has macOS running on ARM64 internally, just like they had OSX running on Intel internally years ago

It's not a matter of IF, it's just a matter of WHEN

What kind of black magic do they employ in these chips?

But the SoC is not

Are you running a benchmark right now?

No real competition. For android phones Qualcomm is pretty much guaranteed a place in all new flagship models. Samsung can use Exynos in a few of their models but it doesn't support all LTE frequencies due to Qualcomm's patents, and every other SoC is a mid-tier piece of shit

With lack of competition they have no incentive to drive progress. Similar to Intel over the last ten years, releasing basically the same processor year after year with 0.5% performance improvements

>it's literally over 3 fucking times faster than the flagship phone from their only competitor released a week ago
This is some crazy shit. Got some more real use benches?

none, Geekbench is insanely optimized for Aplel specific hardware, hence the scores

The video editing part shows that it's clearly not only down to benchmark cheating.

So do Google optimise their JavaScript benchmarks for Apple products too?

No, its just you. An autistic and poor pajeet.

So do Mozilla optimise their benchmarks for Apple too?

The amount of denial in this thread is tragic

I'm android all the way but you have to admit we get jewed by being so dependent on Qualcomm who have no incentive to increase performance. They are following the Intel model

>Shilling for Apple
>Calling anyone else a poor pajeet
Do you even know what you buy Jamal

>>all thise apple shills posting benchmarks
Do you idiots know ee 101?
A fucking basic analogy says the following.
If I have a 2watt target maximum power consumption.
What would give me more performance
A) two 1watt cores or
B) four .5watt cores?
Apple is pulling ain intel here, less cores is better becaise idiots don't know how to bench.
Then the supposed smart guys, make geekbench, a rigged pos, that barely has any value.
Then the idiots come again and happily write about some sub1watt cpu is beating to death a fucking 15watt cpu.
Are you fucking even trying?

I am not saying that the 4+4 big.LITTLE solution is good for phones. I am very happy that I got a 808 2+4 big.LITTLE phone, even a 2+2 big.LITTLE would be enough, but you dense m..f... you are getting memed by the 2 shittiest companies in the mobile market.... Qualcomm and apple.

obvious samefag, can't you even properly remove your namefag name

>According to the founder of Geekbench, John Poole, “the short is answer is yes that the scores are comparable across platforms, so if an iPhone 8 scores higher than an i5, then the iPhone 8 is faster than the i5.”
There was a time when Tomshardware was actually smart and would do full research themselves.

Now they just spout shit.

kys idiot.

It's because of idiots like you that I like to come here.

>kraken is fucking single core
Ew. I don't even know if what it is testing is in any way relevant.

>show me that phone running a professional video editing software
Why would customers buying your phone care about professional video software? It's a phone.

My friend please prepone the needful and delete this thread.

Reeeeee why the fuck would they compare benchmarks from two completely different cpu architectures. Every normie with an iphone is gonna wave it about like it's a supercomputer

You ever think Apple gets these chips just to blow benchmarks but suck shit in IRL applications? the same way car makers fake their emissions and EPA so they can suck shit on the road?

Still quite new. Also the A10 already fucked the 835 CPU-wise. Apple's core designs are just better than whatever shit Qualcomm comes up with.

Guess you are one of the retards who buy Mediatek shit with 8 A53 cores and claim it's faster than that stupid iPhone that until recently had only 2 cores. Go back to XDA and keep telling yourself the lie that most software is optimized for multithreading...

sad truth

>geekbench

This is why appletoddlers are universally regarded as technology illiterate troglodytes.

China make good phones?

why is a64 so important

Interesting. My 4670K desktop only scores 147 in FireFox and 149 in Chrome. My 6360U laptop scores 200 in Safari.

Dude, sometimes i cut porn on my phone for /gif/. Why shouldnt i be able to do that while shitting?

what android app is good for this purpose?

soon, they are innovating like mad on their own processor so they can intergrate it with their mac and their iphones. that is why macos is looking more and more like ios, they are trying to slowly shift it since big babies are whining about not wanting to change
prolly in 2020 they will announce a full ios macos integration

If it slows down, the phone is defective.

You wouldn't believe how CPU-intensive Facebook is.

>geekbench
when will this meme end

didn't you hide this thread like 20 posts before this?

>iToys can do super well on a 2kb benchmark that runs entirely in L1 cache and ignores 99% of the CPU
>iToddler brainlets equate this to real world power

I don't care about the fucking processor, that phone will last just 4 hours or something.

Literally how can the entire planet compete?

> cell phone outperforming an i5

doubt.jpg

Lol the denial is unreal

>buy an iphone
>theoretical benchmarks
>apple slows it down in software

>buy an android phone
>remains consistently fast

owned iphones from the 4S through the six, Android phones are ahead at this point in time.

>convinces himself androids are still ahead based on anecdotal evidence instead of consistent evidence presented
Literal delusion

Now what can you do with It? Congrats, it's faster than a five year old laptop.

Now what?

When is Sup Forums going to make an Android build?

>167

Fagdroid BTFO.

Laugh at your denial, that's what.

>phone totally does not thermal throttle, ever

wew