NVIDIA GTX 1070 Ti ?

>NVIDIA GTX 1070 Ti Alleged Specs Surface, A Bargain 1080 Without G5X – Due In October At ~$429

wccftech.com/nvidia-gtx-1070-ti-alleged-specs-surface-bargain-1080-without-g5x-due-october-429/

>nvidia will launch the 1070 ti
>vega drivers are not even finish

This better get 9 Gb/s

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/bitsandchipseng/status/887736810625019910
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Only 1 SM disabled?
Looks fake.

samsung 1070 already work at 9.2 -9.4

I'll believe it when Nvidia shows a product.

A 1070Ti has absolutely no reason to exist. What price is it going to occupy? Checking pcpartpicker, the cheapest 1070 is now $415 and the 1080 is now $510.
>Debuts at $429
Absolute bullshit.

the fuck is this? literally no one asked for it. looks fake af

>This better get 9 Gb/s
Or else?

Not enough bandwith.

didn't seem to hurt the og 1070

No bottleneck with the old 1070

Love my 1070 8gb OC, I got it just before the ETH boom, now it costs near 200 extra today in my country, phew...

fucken sell that shit bruv

Old 1070 has singificantly less ALUs.

Why would I do that?

my bet: it will cost $400 like current 1070, but 1070 will drop to it's proper 300-320 price range as it was supposed to cost last year on launch just like 970.

at least it's still worth something
both 1070ti and mining crash will hurt your resale value

It only exists to beat the Vega 56 GPU.
All it needs is a small 10% bump and there will be no reason to buy Vega.

Why do you think drivers are running late? If leather jacket man announces it mid October the drivers will drop to blow it out of the water.

>AMD is sandbagging I swear!
I will never understand how AMD fans think.
It's always a wait game for something better.
But nothing ever comes.

It took AMD close to 1.5 years to get the 290x drivers stable.
What makes you think Vega willany different?

>keep amdrones waiting for a 1080 analog for a year and a half
>release shitty card that can't beat the said year and a half old 1080
>power consumption is twice as high
>price is similar to 1080ti
>still no fucking stock
>didn't even send cards to partners, so they could implement their own design
>fucking Raja himself gets fired over this incredible fail
>AMDRONES STILL BELIEVE IT IS A GREAT CARD, THEY JUST HAVE TO WAIT A LITTLE MORE

I swear to god, amdrones are the stupidest fan base I have ever seen. It is beyond retarded

It's going to perform 2% faster than a Vega 64 at half the power consumption. I think they just want want Raja fired from Radeon at this point.

They've done this before too, when the GTX 260 was usurped they released the GTX 260 Core 216

It was *never* supposed to be the same price as a 970

cryptominer's dream

it should be 399

GTX 1070 is either $299 - $329 or discontinued once GTX 1070 Ti is launched

Yields have matured since last year and Nvidia probably has a lot of GPUs that have more functional SMs but not good enough to be GTX 1080s so they can go with 2432 CUDA cores enabled in the new GTX 1070 Ti

>fucking Raja himself gets fired over this incredible fail
?
I don't remember AMD announcing any layoffs.

>and even with no drivers vega 56 is still faster

10% faster than 1070
10% slower than 1080

What's the fucking point? They could have just lowered 1070 and 1080 prices instead of adding another card that will never sell for the price they advertise.

It's nVidia, they love to throw pointless SKUs right and left.

Usually the Ti are just the ungimped cards that age the best

The increase of the GDDR5X price, they will make a GTX 1080 but with regular GDDR5. It's cheaper, no major booklet, the card will only lose 128 cores.

>ungimped
I wound't call 1080ti (3584:228:88) ungimped.

He took a vacation and idiots assume that means he fell out of favor. Raja is an engineer, Vega is in the driver teams hands now.

G5 price is also increasing.
Shitposters gotta shitpost.

The driver team located in China somewhere

>G5 price is also increasing.
Yeah but it is cheaper.

And India.

A properly cooled 1070 runs about $450 right now.
The whole point of a 1070 is that it is the best all around cards.
More cuda cores = more power utilization.
Keeping the memory bandwidth the same and hiking cuda core count sounds like a gimmick....

In that case, fair enough GDDR5X isnt really a selling point anyway. GDDR5 beats it in a number of flows. That being said, it still feels like a gimmick.

I have 1070s and vegas. They offer two different things two different groups. As this is modus operanda for nvidia pulling this stunts, I wouldn't be surprised if RTG literally sandbagged their cards waiting for Nvidia to pull a stunt like this. I work in this industry and this stupid one-up-manship right after someone else's product launch gets old. As it is a norm, they literally have a whole marketing and business group who holds back on features to ensure responses such as these don't go unanswered.

RTG is not sandbagging their cards.
It's "Pro lineup goes first and who cares about the rest" kind of stuff.

twitter.com/bitsandchipseng/status/887736810625019910

>Faggots still believe this shit

>A Bargain 1080 Without G5X – Due In October At ~$429
>A Bargain
>~$429
I hate being able to remember the past

>being anally devastated over some Twitter post

This is incorrect. It would have, should have, and was designed to occupy that very same market space but due to a number of extraneous circumstances was allowed to exceed price barriers that should not have existed.

People voted with their vallets.

1070Ti is probably just a fully enabled GP104 slapped with GDDR5 with 1070 clockspeeds. It will be bandwidth-starved (like aggressively OC 1070s) and still lose to Vega 56.

It will go for slightly less for 1080 right now due to crypto-currency maina.

Nvidia is just trying dump excessive GP104 stock onto the market to make room for upcoming GV104 SKUs.

I suspect the 1070Ti's real purpose to make users upsell themselves to a 1080 since the price difference is small but 1080 is a far better card for the small difference.

Not really, people follow, leaders lead.
Leaders do what they are allowed to do.
Most of it was aggressive and often dirty marketing.

The 1080 is already cannabalizing the 1070. Nobody of sound mind would opt out of a 15-25% performance difference over $100. A 1070 Ti has no purpose, that's not to say of course that people won't buy it.

To clear out excessive GP104 stock because there's isn't enough GDDR5X chips for the amount of "good" GP104s chips.

Nvidia has done this a number of time. *cough* 770 *cough* 760 *cough* 570 *cough* as recent examples.

If it can compete with 56 at a much lower power consumption I will get it

Then the current 1070 will probly be more like a 1060 Ti. Noite this card still has GDDRX and Pascal really likes memory bandwith.
400 more shaders, so around 15 % performance. I don't think it will be worth it for 1070 users.
It may have a purpose for people who haven't bought anything yet. And yes, the 1080 is the more worthy choice. Im my country (Germany) theres around 60 € price difference from 1070 to 1080. Anyway, I would get a 1080 even for 1080p nowadays, if I had the money, otherwise you should go with the Ti models.

A Ti is insanely expensive, but it will definitely last a while. The old Ti is still near a 1080 and if you bought one of these you are still fine unless you are on a 4K resolution. The 1080 Ti is a nice 4K GPU btw. It maxes Witcher with Hairworks.

>It maxes Witcher with Hairworks.
Sure as hell not at a solid rock 60FPS tho.

Not him, but I'm curious what these extraneous circumstances are if you don't mind filling me in.

Would make more sense a GTX 1060 ti

A more cut-down version of the GP-104

7gb of GDDR5

There is a HUGE PRICE GAP between the GTX 1060 and the GTX 1070.

980ti coming through. Best card last generation, still a competitor this gen.

You fucking tell me, all the other pascal cards paralleled their predecessors in price while exceeding them in specifications. The only real difference is the steep price markup they tacked on for the 2.3x VRAM capacity. This leads me to conclude the extraneous factors were market manipulation and price gouging as a product of lacking competition at the time of release.

It may happen if Nvidia needs to dump off excessive "defective" GP104 chips instead of "good" ones.