Have you installed AdNauseam yet? Are you helping us slay the big evil Google, Sup Forums? I know this thread will be full of shills who will claim this is doing nothing to Google... but they're just doing damage control. In reality, fake traffic is killing Google and is destroying the trust between them and advertisers. Destroy the trust and you've destroyed Google's ability to make Billions and censor the web.
So if you haven't already, install AdNauseam and run it. If you have been running it, tell us how many dollars have you cost this pure fucking evil.
>Google and Its Partners Will Issue Refunds to Advertisers Over Fake Traffic >Company says several major online ad ‘exchanges’ have agreed to cooperate
>Alphabet Inc.’s Google confirmed Thursday it will issue refunds for ads bought through its systems that ran on websites with fake traffic, and said a handful of its partners have agreed to do the same.
I don't expect this to slay them any time soon, but I wonder, how long until Google is like AOL? And what equally (if not more) onerous tech hegemon would replace them?
Hunter Hughes
LOL
Caleb Baker
Even if it does nothing, I'll continue to run ad nauseum and other anti-google software just to let them know I want them all literally dead. Not just the company itself, but the socjus who work for it. I would enjoy it if they all encountered very unfortunate accidents and illnesses and died.
Jacob James
Full text. I find it amusing that they're doing so badly at detecting fraud. Remember how shills in Adnauseam threads used to tell us that we're wasting our time? LOL! Just make sure your click rate is 50% and less. And when someone tells you they can detect random events, just laugh at them because they don't understand even the basic stats.
Zachary Ross
adnauseam is jewish botnet shilled by the same group of fags who cite an article that is about pajeet clickfarms that they falsy attribute to their virus. these discord faggots will try to undermine your concerns by insinuating that you are an employee of google browsing a vietnamese mudpainting board during work hours. run a light browser and block javascript.
Jaxson Wilson
>be OP >jobless bottomfeeder >start an adsense scam to generate fake ad click revenue >recruit morons from Sup Forums >tell them some bullshit about sticking it to the SJWs or whatever >thousands of shekels every week
brilliant
Isaac Long
Didn't take long for the shills to show up.
Mason Ramirez
>political warfare through ad clicking top lel
William Sanders
its amazing how everyone is a shill when you're a retard
Josiah Gray
>Name calling Wow you sure showed him.
Jose Kelly
>still no Safari release Where's the love for Macfags?
Connor Allen
yeah faggot. you got hurt feelings faggot? what's it like sucking dicks? go back to your discord, faggot.
Ayden Taylor
use something that isn't safari?
Jordan Edwards
>The ad industry has been working aggressively to tackle fraud. Some $6.5 billion in ad spending will be wasted this year to fraud, down 10% from 2016 >down 10% you guys sure are doing something, and it ain't in your favor LOL make it easier for them to detect that fraud babes
Eli Flores
>The ad industry has been working aggressively to tackle fraud. Some $6.5 billion in ad spending will be wasted this year to fraud, down 10% from 2016, according to a report released in May
inb4 >10% bounce back
Joshua White
oo-ooh goys what are you doing? also as an android dev i dissaprove of this ... for now >inb4 poo
Dylan Lewis
>use something that isn't safari? But I like Safari
Jonathan Ortiz
But Safari is so /comfy/ and fast
Carter Turner
does it allow extensions?
Anthony Morales
as a windows user, safari is the comfy browser i miss the most
Jacob Jenkins
I didnt know about this, installing now Will it help my hentai sites?
Christian Butler
>all that shilling Google shills are running scared! KEK
Julian Howard
no more than UBO, it's the same shit but it sends a request (simulated click) to the ad instead of actually clicking it, then dumps whatever gets returned because that's useless.
I did notice it is slower than straight UBO, however.
Aaron Sullivan
yes it will help hide your clicks in a sea of dildo ads
Luke Reyes
lol you called him a shill again, epic
Adrian Ross
so how does this shit work?
Cooper Sullivan
Pretty sure it does
Carson Smith
it blocks ads and it also sends fake clicks to advertising networks and it makes them less profitable and makes them lose money and lose clients.
Landon Hall
You join OP's botnet, run a script that clicks a custom list of a bunch of links on his adfarm, google deposits shekels in his bank account, then you win!
Carson Collins
woah dude you're totally right i pinged you on discord bro, answer me
Sebastian Cruz
please subscribe to this issue and post there as well requesting AdN for Safari.
Adnauseam clicks on all the ads in a secure background process while hiding them from view
it will stop google from secretly tracking your preferences because it will fill up your profile with white noise
also the clicks will simulate damage to google, it is fun watching the number climb up
Carson Ramirez
Remember, none of the nu/g/ faggots who shill adnauseam knows what tcp/ip even is.
Brayden Green
the ads aren't blocked, they're hidden you can't block ads and still connect to them and click lmao hence why it's slow
Jayden Campbell
and how is google losing money?
Caleb Brown
it doesn't. it's literally a placebo of you actually LOOKING at the ads you block.
Andrew Campbell
Did you not read the fucking OP?
They're issuing refunds for fake clicks caused by AdNauseum.
Charles Taylor
mods please move this thread to as it has nothing to do with technology
Daniel Moore
It's working... >Google and Its Partners Will Issue Refunds to Advertisers Over Fake Traffic >archive.fo/2017.09.21-223239/https://www.wsj.com/articles/google-and-its-partners-will-issue-refunds-to-advertisers-over-fake-traffic-1506029542 >Google confirmed Thursday it will issue refunds for ads bought through its systems that ran on websites with fake traffic, and said a handful of its partners have agreed to do the same. >The Wall Street Journal reported in August that Google was issuing refunds to some advertisers after ads purchased through its DoubleClick Bid Manager tool ended up running on websites with fraudulent traffic. At the time, Google was only prepared to reimburse advertisers for the “platform fee,” which ranged from 7% to 10% of the total ad spending. That reflected the fee those advertisers paid to use Google’s ad-buying tools. The rest of the money flows through to dozens of online ad exchanges, which connect marketers to ad space across a vast number of websites through real-time auctions. At issue is when ads run on sites with fraudulent traffic, including those loaded or clicked by software programs known as “bots” instead of humans. In a blog post, Google said a handful of major exchanges have now agreed to issue full refunds for fraudulent ad space that was purchased. >“Supply partners like AppNexus, Index Exchange, OpenX, Teads, Telaria and DoubleClick Ad Exchange have been very supportive of these changes and have committed to provide advertisers with refunds for invalid traffic detected up to 30-days after monthly billing,” the blog post read. The ad industry has been working aggressively to tackle fraud. Some $6.5 billion in ad spending will be wasted this year to fraud, down 10% from 2016, according to a report released in May by the Association of National Advertisers and ad-fraud detection firm WhiteOps.
James Cruz
>caused by AdNauseam jej
Eli Jones
and why not use ublock instead?
then how google is losing money when they just give refunds? doesn't this mean they can filter out the fake traffic?
Bentley Allen
They are not mentioning adNauseam. Is it because they just noticed and do not know about it or do they fear that more people will use it if it makes it into the news
Carter Hughes
2 ways. 1) ads as a whole are devalued. if someone can disregard a certain percentage of clicks, then the click total is less valuable. 2) google has been under pressure to refund clicks that have been confirmed as fake, so they directly lose money through refunds
>then how google is losing money when they just give refunds? doesn't this mean they can filter out the fake traffic? obviously they aren't filtering out fake traffic, otherwise they wouldn't serve those ads in the first place. it takes more effort to refund clicks than to just not send them in the first place
William Brown
Because real fake clicks are done by chink and pajeet farms that out perform adnauseam times infinity. Google doesn't care about the fake clicks you give to porn ads while watching foot fetish videos.
Cooper Morgan
It doesn't install on Android
Jayden Thomas
You seem to forget who 'we' are.
Nathan Ward
>They are not mentioning adNauseam Of course they're not. They don't want to give credit to their enemies. But make no mistake.... AdNauseam has already caused them hundreds of millions of dollars in direct damage.
Parker Rogers
>then how google is losing money when they just give refunds? doesn't this mean they can filter out the fake traffic? As a businessman would you even bother buying Google ads if you know that a great deal of their traffic is fake? What is the chicken saying?
Nathan Ross
k den
Julian Morris
ads aren't as a whole devalued google 'refunds' fraudulent clicks through more ad spaces/ad time
Nathaniel Baker
no idea man I barely understand this shit
Daniel Jackson
>LITERALLY shilling your useless ad blocker >posting an article which mentions a completely different mainstream tool as an example of why this dumb addon is 'working' >anyone who calls out the bullshit is a google shill
Jacob Jackson
>pay for certain number of clicks >some clicks are "fraudulent" >get more clicks than you paid for how is this not devaluing?
Jackson Davis
3) Google loses credibility and credibility with their customers, their advertisers, is their most valuable asset. Destroy Google's credibility and value to their advertisers and you've destroyed Google.
Thomas Reed
the devs behind it are jews (who majored in marketing) who outsourced any actual development to chinks wouldn't be all that surprised if they're doing a lil guerilla chan marketing desu, would make sense since all the explanations of how it works aren't backed up by anything except speculation
Christian Roberts
>being this angry because your NEET-lifestyle funded by adwords is being threatened Time to get a job, asshole.
Michael Campbell
its not stupid if its working
Adam Murphy
...
Ethan Campbell
OH NO GOOGLE HAVE TO ISSUE REFUNDS TO MONEY ALREADY PAID TO THEM!
GOOGLE ARE FINISHED AND THE JEWS ARE KILL!
Actually no, the fact that they've already received the currency is a good deal for them.
>as a businessman would you even bother buying Google ads if you know that a great deal of their traffic is fake?
The traffic data is just a fluff marketing for google. You're not going to stop advertising on Google just because the numbers are slightly dodgy because the traffic is still astoundingly better than any other competitor.
Tyler Russell
If I do adnauseam in a seperate browser, will google know it's me in a different one?
Josiah Wright
it is therapeutic, watching the ad vault grow bigger and bigger and the number goes higher and higher is the biggest satisfaction one can have
Zachary Wright
you do realize that the jewish male and female behind adnauseum are sjws? If you truly were this triggered over sjws why would you use their software lmao
At least use different reaction images to give the impression that you aren't the same faggot making every single one of these threads.
Chase Lee
I didn't make this thread, stay salty.
William Baker
>In contrast to other blockers, AdNauseam does not block conventional, visual Ads, but hides them instead (when configured by the user to do so). This does not prevent such resources from being downloaded, but only impacts the way the page is rendered in your browser. This is done as safely as possible. Yikes, anons here are actually opening themselves up to a whole slew of security issues but are totally OK with it because the 'devs' claim it's "done as safely as possible".
Luis Cook
That's called the placebo effect.
>block all the ads and give fake clicks lol!!! >hey guys look at all my ads! >lets keep checking in and looking at all our ads! >zoom in! >look at that ad! sheep
Jack Walker
sick pepe fellow magapede, mind if i add it to my collection?
Daniel Clark
And how is a single click worth over a dollar?
Logan Phillips
Hey man, you still haven't replied to me on discord. We got a change of plan. Don't post images until we talk.
Wyatt Allen
just install adnauseam on your friends and family's computers. They use facebook and twitter anyway, so it's not like they give a shit about their privacy.
Bentley Scott
Will do.
Landon Parker
it isn't gorilla marketing, its straight up regular marketing. pretty obvious
Jeremiah Campbell
The worst part about all the adnauseum shilling is anons don't even realize they're creating thorough profiles of themselves. With all of their posted "vaults", you fully understand what their interests are and what they like. You can see they visit porn websites, browsed around for some gaming, and then visited Sup Forums. The only actual way adnauseum would work is if it demanded an entire separate process from your computer to constantly run its own browsing that was completely randomized. But alas, can't expect nu-Sup Forums to care.
Levi Kelly
It is possible that it does not work and Google does not care, but how would you explain the extreme shilling everywhere and the ban from chrome store and palememe virtue signal ban?
If it doesn't work, why would anyone care enough for the 200 jew calling and terrorism calling and other scary nonsense?
If it doesn't work, they have super duper overreacted, and for that alone, it is fun purely to see how triggered they can become if nothing else
google CTR team your turn
Luke Campbell
>just put it on other people's computers without their permission, goyim a.pomfe.co/yjouxyh.webm
Sebastian Walker
>And how is a single click worth over a dollar? Dollar? Some clicks are worth $50+... yes, that's not a typo.
>It's working >google has to pay a small portion of money they already receive back if you can prove that the traffic is fake.
>The ad industry has been working aggressively to tackle fraud. Some $6.5 billion in ad spending will be wasted this year to fraud, down 10% from 2016, according to a report released in May by the Association of National Advertisers and ad-fraud detection firm WhiteOps.
Yeah Google are really crying about the billions of dollars in money for nothing they should never have had if you can prove your ad fraud...
Ryder Perez
not trying to shill here, but how is google losing money from this? sounds like its
>google gets money from fake traffic >discovers traffic was fake >gives money back
i guess they lose money in form of the time of the employee who has to deal with the refund, but i think that's pretty minimal
Christian Johnson
There is already a script to automate all of this. Plus we recommend using AdNauseam in a separate browser, but looks like you're still here spreading FUD because your NEET lifestyle funded by AdWords is being threatened.
Ian Young
Evil Google's scared shitless of AdNauseam! They keep on deleting it from Chrome even if you've installed it manually!
TOP KEK
Can't wait for shills to tell me how this is nothing and waste of our time.
Jacob Sanders
They don't understand what the network layer even is. I'm not surprised.
Wyatt Edwards
>The only actual way adnauseum would work is if it demanded an entire separate process from your computer to constantly run its own browsing that was completely randomized.
Yes, good point.
Use TrackMeNot, it is literally built to run alongside Adnauseam for this exact purpose
Justin Wilson
So not only do you download from compromised malware serving ad networks, you literally click them and then load their exploit kits?
David Nelson
this is how you know adnaueam is the real shit that google fears. just like kikes, they recoil visibly when you hit the right spot.
Ryan Adams
Hey bro, good post. Go ahead and post the meme I sent you on Discord. It'll work really well here. I've been on Sup Forums for a few months and I know what they like.
Robert Jackson
you're missing the most important step:
>adveritsers spend less money with Google since their campaigns aren't profitable anymore and dealing with Google's returns is more pain than worth.
Key to this fight is in destroying trust in Google. If you destroy the trust that their advertisers (real customers) have in Google, you've destroyed the Google itself.
Sebastian Gomez
>extreme shilling The only extreme shilling here is by one retarded autist thinking they're sticking it to the man by commiting ad-fraud.
All you're doing is giving google free money which they may or may not return to the ad buyers depending on whether they can prove that the traffic is fraudulent.
THEY ARE STILL GETTING THE MONEY YOU STUPID KEK THEY JUST HAVE TO RETURN SOME OF IT NOW IF AND WHEN YOU CAN PROVE SHIT THAT NOBODY REALLY KNOWS EXCEPT GOOGLE INTERNALLY.
Leo Jenkins
>Using Chrome >Thinking you can 'stick it to the man' Holy shit this is getting ridiculous, you are a tool
Landon Hernandez
Yeah. And you can't even run another adblocker to protect yourself, they literally advocate against it because it'll intrude on Adnauseum.
Alexander Howard
>malware serving ad networks
Google ads are clean (probably), the malware are from dodgy porn sites
Evan Jackson
>all that shilling your tears are delicious, mr pajeet.
Daniel Long
>Some $6.5 billion in ad spending will be wasted this year to fraud, down 10% from 2016. >down 10% from 2016 Wow, you helped Google improve their fraud detection.
Ryder Hall
Look, i hate googlel as much as anyone else, but if you seriously think you're making a dent in company that figuratively IS the internet nowadays, you're dumb
Charles Watson
>we recommend shoo jew shoo
Jason Nguyen
NO not that one bro. That one's a good one though because it has Pepe. Seriously respond to me on Discord.
Jackson Russell
So this is pretty brilliant. A lot of people are asking, "why not just use adblock?"
That's because not even a half of a half of a percent of internet users (read: Google's product) will install and run this. So taking out Google's ad revenue streams this way will absolutely not work. However, what you CAN do is make it so that big business doesn't want to pay Google for its data, which is why Google pays you in the first place. Google pays you for clicksense because they in turn flip and sell the meta data to businesses who then feed that data to R&D to focus advertisements more tailored to you. They then tell Google who controls what ads appear to you which ads to play based of their research.
This whole system fails if the data is no longer relevant. Google can no longer efficiently provide guarantees that its user data is actually user data and not just clickbots hitting every ad on a page (which again is not helpful to big business). If even a decent chunk of the data is false data then how can they be certain any of it is?
However I think the BIGGEST implication of this is that if this type of thing can happen to Google, the biggest online ad market in the world (that has its own wildly popular browser that does even MORE data mining for big business) then no ad tailoring online is safe and why even bother investing in something like that? It's a pretty interesting idea that COULD lead to a world free of TOS locked meta data auctioning.