It was tolerable when the term was only applied to different levels in cloud infrastructure
It was tolerable when the term was only applied to different levels in cloud infrastructure
Other urls found in this thread:
I want to sell my shitposting as a service, who do I talk to ?
> ... in the cloud
Trump. Hilary, McDonalds, KFC, Sony, Valve, Microsoft, Apple, Ford, General Electric, Lockheed Martin, Ford, Boeing, Kyoto Animation, ATF, Marvel, Man United, Planet Fitness, Game Workshops.
tet
> uber for ...
...
>disrupt the ... industry
>make the world a better place
>machine learning
>big data
>cyber
>"the illuminati/freemasons control...."
DUDE
OPERATING SYSTEM AS A SERVICE
LMAO
>internet of things
>Why I'm using ....js
>the "modern" coder's resume
do you even full spectrum cyber?
>serverless architecture
this
>When you sell closed-source modified commercial GIMP as a service, completely legally getting around GPL, GNU and Stallman
> tfw second Jinrui season is never going to happen
Why Japs don't like experimental anime and dig only schoolgirls pantsu.
Buy our PDF reader, Adobe Acrobat, As a service
>imageboard as a service
Who else is excited for cloud-based sexbot-as-a-service architecture frameworks? I can't wait to request for the Internet of Things to extract an orgasm from my turgid shaft while some teledildonics company is gathering data about the consistency and volume of my load for de-identified sale to their marketing partners.
eh, split down the middle here. saas usually gets you the big software package (that previously would have cost small fortune) almost for free, then value-added monthly billables which pay for "big software package" over the life of your subscription and then some. seems like a fair trade here.
other xAAS: not a fan.
also the old xAAS (like cloud infra). cheap way to grab compute resources. otherwise it's mostly crap.
>turgid shaft
sounds like the name of the next github ceo
this desu
it's even worse
>.io