Would you buy a smartphone with no camera, Sup Forums? >pic related, OC
Pros >less manufacturing cost = cheaper for consumers (camera is the most expensive component in a phone) >can probably fill the camera module with something more preferable >muh NSA can’t watch you or your surroundings Cons >you are not a normie that takes photos every 2 seconds and puts them on social media
>quick user takeba pic of this answer sheet for the exam
Adrian Taylor
I still want the front facing for video calls
Julian Martinez
Why do we need a 2nd thread because you're a retard and wanted to add more to your OP post?
>62626459
Owen Scott
Wait what? I double posted? Didn't realize sorry, deleting it now.
Cameron Bailey
Done.
David Cook
Yes. Smartphone cameras are such fucking shit I never use them anyway.
Cooper Powell
The front camera is useless to me, I covered it with a piece of tape
Elijah Martin
>(camera is the most expensive component in a phone) for that alone I'd support phones with cameras DSLR sensors could be improved with all the miniaturization being done
Jason Rivera
>That fingerprint sensor on S8
Easton White
Yes. It would be fucking great. I don't use it but still have to pay for it.
William Davis
>scanning your fingerprint for the big data jew Not going to trick me samsung.
Eli Hill
Are you retarded? Your fingerprints are almost 100% already on SOMEONEs database.
Austin Hall
I don't think so, I'm pretty sure that I've never used a fingerprint sensor in my life, passport is also without fingerprint.
Tyler Roberts
I would rather keep the back camera for camera purposes. I never do video chats or selfies with it.
Alexander Rivera
Have you never needed a background check for a job?
Not to mention any high quality photo of you can be enhanced enough to pick up your finger prints. This method was used by researchers to make a duplicate of Angela Merkel's fingerprints using just a high quality DSLR photo of her. They then printed out the fingerprint using some special 3D printer and it was good enough to fool a fingerprint reader. The only source used was a picture.
You don't need to have a true fingerprint taken via electronic or dye means for them to have access to your fingerprint.
Camden Wilson
>You don't need to have a true fingerprint taken via electronic or dye means for them to have access to your fingerprint. that doesn't mean everyones fingerprints are likely in a database though
Charles Perez
Unless you live completly off the grid, odds are your fingerprints are in SOMEONEs database.
I know for a fact i'm in the FBI database because of a job I had a few years ago working for a local government.
Carter Turner
>background check for a job never had to do more than the usual stuff, because there are no criminal offenses in my record. >duplicating fingerprints from high quality fingerprint If anyone puts that much energy into getting my fingerprints chances are that they will get them one way or another, but I would argue that there are almost no full body pictures of me or any photos at all (except photos my parents took when I was a child). Would be a big surprise if my fingerprints were already in some sort of database.
Samuel Wood
>because there are no criminal offenses in my record That's not why they would take fingerprints. They run it on a national database in case you have previous records in other states under a potentially different name.
I did it when I was working for a school system as technically the job could have me around children.
I have no criminal record and never have.
Lincoln Kelly
guess you live in the us of a, but I don't think fingerprints for background checks are so common around here,but it could be a different story if I would try to work for the military or other state owned stuff.
Anthony Green
>camera is the most expensive component in a phone after the screen and SoC, perhaps
Liam Butler
Nope. I'm pretty sure SoC is one of the cheapest to manufacture. Either camera or the flash memory is the most expensive ones, depending on the model of course.
Adam Cook
Nope, I'm pretty confident the SoC is the most expensive part after the screen in any average flagship.
>(camera is the most expensive component in a phone) Doubt it's anywhere near the price of the screen and SOC or even memory when your phone uses NVMe and not some ghetto tier shit.
>can probably fill the camera module with something more preferable Like?
>muh NSA can’t watch you or your surroundings >what are infrared cameras and satellites If NSA wants to watch you, they'll find a way.
>you are not a normie that takes photos every 2 seconds and puts them on social media I barely take photos at all, but sometimes you see something cool when you go (((outside))) or need to deliver a dick pic and ain't going to buy an extra device for that.