ITT: With the release of Firefox Quantum on NOV 14, and the promises of %30 less memory, twice as fast, and a new (((web engine))), will FFQ be all it's cracked up to be? Opinions welcome!
---------------------ONLY RULE---------------------
>dont be a cunt
RESPECT other Sup Forumsentoosman's opinions, and provide evidence to support your own! Don't be a cunt!
Other urls found in this thread:
mozilla.github.io
addons.mozilla.org
twitter.com
I'll consider switching when it's twice as fast as Chrome :^)
But will it support muh extensions?
This unironically
about:addons and search addons marked legacy on the extension finder.
>click [legacy] and look for extension finder link
mozilla.github.io
I know this is supposed to be a joke but after they are done with webrender and "quantum dom" it very well could be.
I would never use Chrome so I'm glad Firefox is leveling the playing field.
it seems fishy that it got such an upgrade after they became butt buddies with google
been using 57. uses like the same memory and cpu as chrome lol. idk where this 30% theyre talking about is
>after they became butt buddies with google
Quantum has been in development for a long time, what are you talking about?
Latest Nightly is already Quantum, right?
Amazing on my tablet in landscape, feels great and comfy just like desktop Firefox
>using a tablet in 2K17
its above. its 58.a
Just installed Firefox Quantum beta and it works like a charm so far. That said, I've upgraded from FirefoxNightly and I won't have to put up with the near daily updates.
its fast as hell i dont even care that the devs are cucks
I'll consider switching when/if it gets functional tree style tabs.
What are you using now that has them?
>soros browser
Firefox with the tree style tabs addon.
I don't think that this addon will be available with the new extension API.
Actually
addons.mozilla.org
Still new and needs work but it's possible to accomplish tree tabs with the webextensions APIs. Currently Firefox does not support hiding the tab bar though, Mozilla is trying to figure out the best way to implement something like that.