No thread?
Also macOS kernel is open too.
More: opensource.apple.com
Is this a leak or
No shits official.
>XNU is an acronym for XNU is Not Unix.
Macs are Unix fags BTFO.
Huh
Is it Open Source(tm) or just source that is open?
It's real. Almost bust a nut until
>The source code is supplied with the Apple Public Source License 2.0
>tfw apple only released this to the benefit of it's developers
>there will never be an OSX compatibility shell like Wine
Nothing to see here.
Darwin's been open source for years idiots
I believe its good news for Jailbreakers as well since it'll be easier to find vulnerabilities with the kernel open.
but the source is right there. you're saying we won't see a shell because you need licensing? you're saying we won't see a pirate shell?
It's nothing
free != freedom
here's the IO for the graphics framebuffer right here. what's stopping me from making a sell?
>what's stopping me from making a sell?
My guess is lack of motivation.
yea but this is ios specific shit
Holy fug, how exactly will this influence the hackintosh scene?
Who cares, Apple is nothing without its userland.
Nobody cares about the kernel
What did they mean by this?
Who fkn knows
audit it now
Doesn't mean you can run modified kernel code
>he says as he flees like a coward and never follows up why
what's with you guys? this is the second "It's nothing" style post already.
>spreading disinfo over apple source
>disinfo with apple sauce spread over it
Modified Code. You may modify Covered Code and use, reproduce,
display, perform, internally distribute within Your organization, and
Externally Deploy Your Modifications and Covered Code, for commercial or
non-commercial purposes
iPhones can't run the code for """security""" though
This has been open source for years.
Really?
nah, that's more weird deception and disinfo. no idea why shills are here. probably microshit.
but they released the source to 10.13, which didn't exist "for years"
So how long until we get a pile of mediocre macOS distros?
The kernel is useless by itself.
fucking finally
best kernel
Would the same as with windows source code leaks and wine apply in this case too, i.e. would you be barred from contributing to an open source compatibility layer if you've looked at the source code before?
Best in what?
>the nucleus of the atom is useless by itself
but it serves a clear and necessary purpose