>(USD 1K)
>$117
>$117,000 USD
what was intel THINKING
(USD 1K)
Owen Parker
Other urls found in this thread:
newegg.com
newegg.com
newegg.com
newegg.com
newegg.com
newegg.com
newsroom.intel.com
videocardz.com
twitter.com
Xavier Ross
this shillness is going to keep for a long time i pressume
Jeremiah Jackson
As in MSRP for 1k tray quantities.
Jordan Morris
nah, intel pulled vega
you can't buy this CPU - limited stock, not that you'd want to just like vega haha
Eli Campbell
Intel is not chained by big OEM contracts for covfefe lake.
This launch is fucking retarded.
Chase Moore
RIP my wallet
Hunter Sullivan
DOA
Isaac Miller
Ryder Taylor
>tfw JUST bought an R7
Kill me
Should I return all this shit and... no
Isaiah Harris
...
Jaxon Reyes
>He fell for the ryzen meme
topkek
Jason Mitchell
If you use cpu/gpu userbenchmark you're immediately regarded as retarded. Just link some hardware sites we all know coffee lake will be better for gayming.
Robert Sanchez
What's stopping AyyMD from releasing an 8-core 2600 and a 12-core 2700?
They will never match Intlel in single core performance but they have moar corez that scale better.
Michael Jones
>What's stopping AyyMD from releasing an 8-core 2600 and a 12-core 2700?
honestly nothing fab related or margins losing
problem is socket, am4 can't support more than 8 cores as far as I know, they can drop prices on 1700 even more though
also ryzen refresh coming february, coffee got pathetic clocks, if ryzen clocks at least 10% more coffee is doa
limited stock until the end of 2017 = intel makes no money from it
Ian Morris
Kaby Lake and Kaby-Lake-X SKUs = fucked
Intel took off the kiddie gloves and are going for a price war.
Ryzen is now a very hard sell over Coffee Lake SKUs. Unless you use software that takes advantage of the extra threads of Ryzen stuff. The Coffee Lake's superior IPC/clockspeed makes it win in the majority of the mainstream/gaming content in every price point versus competition.
Connor Brooks
The socket. It cant deliver power for more than 8 cores. Not unless they make a "AM4+" socket. What they can do is drop prices as they have a pretty good margin for the 1700 and 1800 cpu's.
Kayden Scott
It very much can (1331pin).
There's simply no point in going moar cores now.
Jaxon Richardson
Ur dumb for ignoring the results.
The smart way to handle defeat is to claim its only one of many benchmarks that need to be averaged out for a proper clear picture. And thats how it should be.
Gavin Nelson
Zen has similar IPC, but the foundries process is amde for mobile crap and power usage/heat explodes after the 3ghz range. The 12nm refresh will allow them 10% better clocks, and then for Zen 2 they can bring out the IBM process amde for 5ghz chips. Then they are going to laugh at intel's failed 10nm and 14nm+++ refreshes.
Noah Stewart
>2 results
>obviously OCed to hell and back
Wow it's fucking nothing, usershillmark shill. Kill yourself.
James Baker
>This is what shilltel shills actually believe
Dominic Evans
6% markup. $380. Ouch.
Christian King
Meanwhile over at AMD
Parker Evans
AMD have 12nm up their sleeve for beginning of next year. Expect higher clocks on 8 cores to smash the 8700K performance in all but single core.
Caleb Hill
wow nice reading comprehension you got there
It literally says 4.7GHz (stock) and 5GHz (light OC) right there in the image
William Hernandez
Turbo boosting is oveerclocking you moron.
Andrew Myers
This is how it should be. One side releases a better product, the other one answers with a good alternative, but there already a response to it from the first side. This is how we get better stuff. Good job on both sides.
Lincoln Lewis
4.7/5 GHz all core? lol. Yeah, light OC. Retard.
Cameron Sanders
Hehe. Yeah 5Ghz on 6 cores on a 14nm process is not going to be pretty in the power usage and thermals area. We shall see though I guess ;)
Carson Morgan
...
Matthew Adams
the i3 8100 is actually price competitive, since the mobos are dirt cheap.
b350 mobos are more expensive.
Christian Perry
Look buddy. Its 4.7 vs 3.6. On clock speed alone, that's 30% difference.
With intel have around 5-10% ipc edge, that gives additional 10% difference. This is what's reflected in the benchmark.
Actually the benchmark is fairly accurate I'd say.
Joseph Lee
>single core boost
HUR DUR
Chase Morris
that turbo is on a single core you fucktard, all core turbo is lower than in the 7700k
Tyler Robinson
Speculation or proof? Source.
Easton Lee
>the benchmark is fairly accurate I'd say.
Asher Bell
>newsroom.intel.com
straight from the fucking botnet
Joshua Hill
>single core turbo makes it a multithreaded powerhouse
Totally not paid review guys.
Isaiah Clark
Thanks. The wording itself is bit vague, however I'll take it as a matter of fact.
Even so, chances are you can hit those 4.7Ghz with aftermarket cooler easy most likely.
With regards to the stock 4.7 single-core turbo, this is probably intel trying to win PR points. Shady as fuck, but thats what they are. With stock single core at highest clock, they can manipulate single threaded games/program benches. For multithreaded programs, it will equalize itself. This manipulation also extends toward older Intel CPU whos' clocks are limited to 4.5 or lower. Essentially a 4.5% boost in "ipc"
Noah Ortiz
Anyone expecting the 6 core Intel to match/beat AMD's 8 core in MT is smoking some serious shit. Even in their official results they don't get higher than 1441 in Cinebench. You'd need to OC to 4.7/4.8 GHz to match it. videocardz.com
Nolan Martin
You don't understand, goy, if it can achieve 4,7 GHz for 2 nanoseconds it TOTALLY means that AyyMD Ryzed is completely worthless because nobody ever uses multithreaded anything, right?
Jaxon Thomas
>easy most likely.
reminder that you have to delid
Ayden Cook
>uses √ instead of
Holy fuck I'm triggered.
Colton Miller
>Even so, chances are you can hit those 4.7Ghz with aftermarket cooler easy most likely.
Don't go by what reviewers are getting, as Intel is sending out golden review samples as usual. It's going to end up like Kaby Lake all over again.
Parker Murphy
>over ambient
what the actual fuck
Charles White
Free -20K on the charts, but don't tell anyone, shareholders won't be happy
Michael Garcia
...
Ethan Diaz
>not waiting for Z390 and 8 core mainstream CPUs
Alexander James
>userbenchmark
Zachary James
>waiting until 2019 for ice lake
Sebastian Baker
>not waiting for Ryzen+ in Feb 2018
inb4 5 Ghz Ryzen
Isaac Peterson
There aren't going to be cheap motherboard for skylake until next year. Only high end starting
Levi Jackson
>what the actual fuck
oy
John James
...
Zachary Smith
ryzen btfo
Alexander Smith
Ryzen 1800X is less than $500 lol.
Ryan Fisher
Good goy
Evan Collins
Very good point, don't really see why amd boards are so expensive though?