Discuss.
Discuss
>It does not count!
>Muh Ashes of the Singularity!
>Muh handbrake while running OBS and playing back two 4k videos!
>Muh very specific scenario which I only pretend is relevant to me due to fanboyism and post purchase rationalization.
>I'll pretend to not shill as hard as I can
Let's face it, that intel would cost twice that much atleast without AMD's lowering the price bar.
>7000 benchmarks vs 2 benchmarks
Of course people are going to vote for their own CPU because of buyer's remorse
>Comparing average results 2 tests against average of 7,049 tests
Yes, this is obviously very valid
1700 can equal 1800X for less money
There is no cheaper intel 6c/12t which can be OC'ed.
/Thread
> >Muh handbrake while running OBS and playing back two 4k videos!
Not an everyday scenario but it feels good knowing it can do it. Or rather,
> ffmpeg+FRAPS+gaming
Can i7 do that and deliver at least stable 30FPS in, uhm, PUBG or CoD WW2 or whatever people play these days?
2 bechmarchs vs 7k ;
also look at the cloock speed ....
It's good if true but 2 samples means that result is wildly invalid.
This, so much fucking this
>Sup Forums in charge of sample size
7700k for gayman
8700k for streaming
1700 for workstations
1600 if you're obsessed with bang4buck
I got 1700 for gayman, sue me.
>buying 1800 not 1700
Just look at the number line: 1800 is way less than 8700. Therefore AMD < INTEL.
1800x avg turbo 0.55GHz
wtf, is ryzen that shit?
>2 samples
Let's wait a bit, shall we?
1700 for everything desu senpai
Don't you want 100+ more FPS in CS:GO at 640x480?!
Neither. r7 1700.
>8 Cores vs 6 cores
>16 Threads vs 12 threads
>Overclocking vs housefire
>Lower price chipset vs higher price chipset
>New technology vs neutered down xeons to stay relevant in the competition
DISCUSS
My monitor is 2560x1440 and it only goes to 72hz.
I'll be fine with the 1700 ~_^
...
...
>that pic
I think this qualifies people to sue