Better water proofing than iphone and pixel

>better water proofing than iphone and pixel

>has headphone jack

How

pictured: actual courage

t. iPhone 6 owner

Koreans don't care if you get electrocuted

It's not hard waterproofing a port.

If you can afford a $1000 phone you can afford $20-200 Bluetooth headphones. Stop complaining.

Not to mention the huge gaping hole for the stylus.

-u have money, spend more! and do it without complaning goy!

bluetooth headphones lol what kind of a LQ normie are you mang?

It's water resistant, not waterproof. It will survive a drop in the toilet, but it won't survive a shower.

>Afford
Of course I can. Why would I want to use them over my better, more expensive wired cans?

Why do normies hate sound quality

had a moto g3 which is water resistant and it has survived many a shower

>implying there's really a difference when using a shitty phone dac + amp

It's not hard waterproofing a removable battery but companies need more shekels

>having to charge headphones
>having to lose headphones (why just buy more goy)
>having to latency headphones
Go sell your garbage elsewhere, merchant.

Okay that one isn't quite fair to all companies. You all wanted thinner goddamn phones and so it was easier to make things thin when you didn't have to account for the batteries having to be removable. If the thinness meme would die we would all benefit immensely.

That's the s8, not the Note8. Your point still stands though, I'm just a pedantic bitch.

Is the cs4398 really that bad?

Not just latency but compression.

But user I already have $400 IEMs, why would I want a downgrade?

Nobody wanted thinner phones because they were already weak as soon.

Phones can power iems just fine, the actual earphone matters more.

It's not water-proofing, you moron, it's water-resistance and it's a completely different thing.

>people still think phones are water-proof
>no such thing exists in the world today
>no such thing ever will

Why didn't they give them dual front speakers?

good goy

it is not more resistant just because of rating. apple put lower rating on purpose so retards won't go swimming with their phones

what the fuck do you need a removable battery for anyways

when the battery's dead it's time for a new phone anyways.

There are many people who disagree with that. A phone running ICS is still usable.

>>no such thing exists in the world today
>>no such thing ever will
Try again.

Yes it is water resistance, but you wouldn't say "how did you go about water resisting your headphone jack?".

That and the headphone jack itself may be waterproof. There may be no ingress points inside the jack itself.

>why replace a broken part of a perfectly good phone? just buy a new one goy
the absolute state of apple shills

Where does it state that he supports Apple? Can't have a stable argument, must go to name calling.

The absolute state of Sup Forums.

But muh bluetooth stack vulnerabilities

kys namefag