/pcbg/ - PC Building General

>General
Always consider an SSD if you can afford one and buy an HDD later.
If you want to use WiFi, you will need a Wireless Network Adapter. General rule of thumb is 2.4ghz or 5ghz.

>If you want help
Assemble a part list: pcpartpicker.com/
Remember, we're not here to build a parts list for you, we're here to help you.
If your part list has a monitor, list the monitor specs that you need.
State your budget, currency, and usage scenarios.
Learn how to build a PC: youtu.be/VhdV2wv3jQs

>CPUs
A8-9600 - Absolute bare minimum gaymen, does not require a dedicated GPU.
R5 1400 - Best with OCing & high-speed RAM.
i5-8400 - Best value for gaymen
R5 1600 - Best value for mixed uses
R7, used Xeon, Threadripper, or 8700k - Heavy multi-tasking & mixed uses

>GPUs
* Crypto-Currency miners have driven GPU prices up, using an old GPU or waiting to build may be a good idea right now.
1060 3GB - 1080p 60hz at medium/high settings, anything below this just buy an Optiplex and put this GPU or better in.
1060 6GB or RX 580 - 1080p 60hz at ultra settings, former supports G-Sync, latter supports Freesync
1070 - 1080p 144hz / 1440p 60hz at ultra settings
1080 TI - 1440p 144hz / 4k 60hz at ultra settings

>RAM
* RAM costs so much because newer phones use DDR4 memory.
Check your Mobo's QVL if your on a Ryzen platform
Ryzen CPUs benefit a lot from high speed RAM, 3200MHz is ideal

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=zxfjW7dn_HA
youtube.com/watch?v=LCEP7vy9Xxk
youtube.com/watch?v=RjcrNyd5Jcw
youtube.com/watch?v=HM8ZSA-afRU
pcpartpicker.com/product/YqKhP6/intel-core-i3-8100-36ghz-6-core-processor-bx80684i38100
pcpartpicker.com/list/kTLhhq
amazon.de/dp/B015HDO33E/ref=twister_B06Y2DSKQ7?_encoding=UTF8&th=1
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Don't forget AMD is here forever.

Do I really need the VMware OS to Virtualize properly on my R7 1700? I get shit/decent performance on VMware Workstation Pro 14, but I heard ESX was way better, any info?

So now that the news about z370 strix having shit voltage control is out there, what are good mobos to look for in 150-200 price range? Looking to go 8700k 5ghz OC and just game. Prefer for it to not be tacky as fuck like taichi

Or should I just say fuck it and just run stock until they fix voltage with bios down the road.

>Always consider an SSD if you can afford one and buy an HDD later.
This is bullshit

forever and ever!

Suggestions to improve the OP are always welcome. At least you read it.

How?

What would you rather have, 8 times more space or start up windows 7 seconds faster?

SSDs are also quieter.

The actual CPU recommendations:

>A8-9600 - extremely light gaming if you can't afford a dedicated GPU
>G4560/G4600 - non-gaming (light tasks) or bare minimum gaming builds with a dedicated graphics card
>R3 1200 - Budget builds (best with OC + fast RAM)
>i3 8100 - Better budget CPU; extra cost of the currently available Z mobos lessens the value of the CPU
>R5 1600 / i5 8400 - Great gaming or multithreaded use CPUs
>R7 / Used Xeon / Threadripper / i7 - Heavy Multi-Tasking / VM Work / Mixed use
>i7 8700K - 144Hz gaming and higher, out of stock pretty much every due to paper launch

Well, if soneone is spending money on a PC they probably want an SSD to store their operating system and af ew important games or programs. a 250gb or even 120gb SSD would be enough for a few weeks so you could save up 40$ to buy a 1tb HDD.

...

Both, which is why it's better to get the SSD first and then add in a HDD for storage. Otherwise you'll have to reinstall or migrate your OS and programs

stop recommending the g4560
it's not good

It's not just about start up speed.

Oh but it is, retard.

Why are Intel's CPUs so underwhelming lately? It feels like they aren't trying at all. Coffee lake is just Kaby Lake with more cores, in some benchmarks the 7700K is doing better than the 8700K.

What went wrong at Intel? Have their balls dropped or something? Every new CPU just feels like it's a half assed abomination

Oh but it isn't, retard.
youtube.com/watch?v=zxfjW7dn_HA
youtube.com/watch?v=LCEP7vy9Xxk
youtube.com/watch?v=RjcrNyd5Jcw

not just windows
>all important application
>muh gaymes
>quieter

not to mention I've never had an SSD physically fail while I've had 2 HDDs die

>Have their balls dropped
You don't know what that expression means.

Secondly AMD is still below Intel if you consider let's say an R3 1200 clocked at 3.6GHz and an i3 8100 (same number of cores/threads and same clockspeed). No company can / will do any better. Worth noting that x86 is pretty fucking old now and IPC is stuck as is clockspeed unless there's a node shrink.

Literally nobody gives a fuck about iGPUs except you. You're the same retard who's been shitting up the thread shilling Bulldozer-based APUs for a while now. Ebin trolling man, I'm sure lots of people have bought one of those pieces of shit based on your say so. :^)

THOSE VIDEOS SHOW SYSTEMS WITHOUT A DEDICATED GRAPHICS CARD.
Jesus, I honestly cannot believe your stupidity.

What raid configs are common and good for 2 ssds

I see. This is the video game console assembly thread.

Didn't look at the videos, but am currently using an iGPU.

Get rekt faggot. G4560 performs way better than any current APU with a graphics card.

If you want to play at 720p Low at 20-30FPS with an APU, go right ahead.

But they did, Coffee Lake is barely better than Kaby Lake, in some benchmarks it does worse than the 7700K, people got jewed big time by having to buy a new motherboard when CL was supposed to be the last CPU family for the 1151 socket, and if you buy a CL you're buying a dead socket already. By what kind of metric is this shit remotely good?

Who knows maybe the CPUs will start flying off the shelves but it's just a shitty deal.

This is the PC building thread. If anybody is thinking of putting together a new build for gaming using an iGPU, which is what the autist Bulldozer spammer recommends, they should kill themselves.

>gaming
When are you going to grow up?

No one cares about iGPUs except laptop shitters with a 1366x768 screen. A GTX 1030 is around $75 and an RX 550 is around $90. Both will give you a much better experience than an iGPU, especially AMD since Bristol Ridge is absolute shit. The A8-9600 is absolute poverty-tier, it's only for extreme poorfags who might be able to save up for Ryzen eventually.

If you don't play games, the G4560 iGPU is great. 4K netflix streaming, etc. No reason to get an APU that's hotter and overall worse even for browsing. The APUs' only "advantage" is being able to play games at 720p Low.

>a hobby or activity can no longer be enjoyed after an arbitrary age
when are you?

Did anyone ever build a home server with an MSI B150M PRO-DDP, using ECC RAM? I can't wrap my head around how or why a 60 bucks board should support ECC RAM.

That's the thing, even if you're a normie who doesn't play games the Pentium is still better, the iGPU on Bristol Ridge is good but the CPU itself sucks and bottlenecks even doing basic Windows tasks.

...

>The A8-9600 is absolute poverty-tier, it's only for extreme poorfags who might be able to save up for Ryzen eventually.
Those people should wait for the Vega/Zen APUs then. No extreme poorfag should be buying an R3 or above

>triggered manchild
No, seriously, when are you going to grow up?

>Coffee Lake is barely better than Kaby Lake
Where did you get this moronic notion? Game engines are already maxed out by current CPUs, so there's no where for them to go. "Productivity" aka multithreaded performance definitely did go up.

>he never grew out of gaming
>he never stopped watching cartoons
>he still has He-man sheets on his race car bed
>vegetables are yucky

Actual graphics card recommendations. Retards can't into Hz

GPUs:
Crypto-Currency miners have driven GPU prices up (particularly Radeon)
1080p
>RX 550/560 and GTX 1030/1050 - very low budget, consider getting a used GPU instead
>GTX 1050Ti and 3GB 1060 are the only reasonably priced cards; 6GB 1060 or 4Gb 580 if you want to overpay a little
>GTX 1070 if you're looking for very high (100+) framerates and you have a CPU and monitor to match
1440p
>GTX 1070 / 1080 are standard choices; currently overpriced. Vega 56 and 64 are decent choices if you undervolt but availability is low.
>GTX 1080Ti if you're looking for very high (100+) framerates and you have a CPU and monitor to match
4K
>GTX 1080Ti

probably never then, I'll just keep enjoying myself
simmer down

>General rule of thumb is 2.4ghz or 5ghz.
Who the fuck wrote this? They are literally the only choices.

Is it pure autism to install windows without a internet connection? My thinking is I want to install the newest drivers from my mobo websites before windows tries to install whatever driver it pulls down from windows update. So I install windows, drivers, then plug in my network cable to let windows update.

Clearly a moron.

I'd at least get the GPU driver, almost guaranteed to be extremely outdated from windows update.

in some game benchmarks the 7700K does better than the 8700K, how's that not a fucking shit deal? I never said it is worst at everything

It means pick one not both you insufferable retard. Learn the meaning of or sometime.

This is almost never true and certain not true on average, and when the 7700K "does better" than the 8700K it's a few FPS, within margin of error.

Not him, but maybe pcbg's op isn't a place to give out networking advice.

Not our problem.

>reddit spacing
>defending a retard

If you get 5GHz, it will have 2.4GHz connectivity as well by default. You are a fucking moron and have no business writing the OP.

And furthermore as I already stated game engines are max out by for instance high end Kaby Lake CPUs. So of course there's going to be an almost non existant performance increase because the limiting factor is the GAME ENGINE and in realistic scenarios the graphics card.

Can a cheap $120 Z370 handle a 8600K close to 5 GHz, assuming my sillicon can get there? Something like 6 phases VRM.

Also my cooler rated for 130 W TDP. Can it handle too or should I buy another one?

Sapphire Pulse rx 560 (2GB) or Zotac gtx 1050 mini (2GB)?
There are better options but i want to know which one is better for overall use.

1050 for power consumption reasons

What are some good mini-itx cases? Are handles actually useful, or just a dumb meme?

>AMDrone OP removing the 8700k and 8100 again

The 8100 is actually a worse value than the Ryzen 3, even in gaming, especially with the more expensive mobos. The clockspeed isn't that high and there's no turbo. The 8700K clearly has a niche though, it's annoying that someone keeps removing it.

>Ryzen CPUs benefit a lot from high speed RAM, 3200MHz is ideal
so why does logicalincrements recommend 2800 on 1600 builds?

>The 8100 is actually a worse value than the Ryzen 3, even in gaming, especially with the more expensive mobos.
Not according to

When will we see 8700k vs Ryzen benchs with variations of Vega 56 / 64?

LI is a bit retarded

Hardware Unboxed already has some in their latest reviews. On a related note, seems Nvidia does not play well with Ryzen in DX12

i3-8100 is $160 with a $120 mobo, while the R3 1200 is $110 and 1300X is $130 with a $60 mobo. You can overclock both to a constant 3.6 GHz and pretty much match the i3.
>youtube.com/watch?v=HM8ZSA-afRU
He overclocked his Ryzen to 3.9GHz, which is probably a little much on a stock cooler, but you get the idea. There's really no reason to buy the 8100 until next year.

>i3-8100 is $160
No.
pcpartpicker.com/product/YqKhP6/intel-core-i3-8100-36ghz-6-core-processor-bx80684i38100

Diminishing returns.

ahhh they are all 1080p tests

whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

Also I already made the point that this faggot is running up against a GPU bottleneck by using a GTX 1060. I'm not saying that an R3 1200 with OC + fast RAM is a bad combo with a GTX1060 (it's a good combo) but thinking that the OC on the R3 can make it match the i3 8100 in NON graphics card limited scenarios is fantasy.

Oh, it was $160 two days ago, Newegg must have gouged the price due to demand. It's sold out now so the $120 is basically a placeholder until it's back in stock. Funny seeing newegg do the same thing as Microcenter did with their $500 i7's.

garbage list. amd make the only cpus that matter right now.
1200 - budget
1600 - good
1700 - great
1950x - rich

>have enough money saved for my new PC and about to pull the trigger
>$700 on medical + eye consultations
>$2500 moving cost because I am so sick of flatmates
>$120 bill for gas
FUCK sake

Turns out you have a garbage brain if you actually think that.

Check benchmarks.

But his whole deal is budget gaming. Someone buying either a Ryzen 3 or i3 will never pair them with something as powerful as a 1080Ti, which makes the difference between them purely academic.

pcpartpicker.com/list/kTLhhq

Made a 8700k/1080ti build. Can anyone help me with mobo, case, cooling, psu? Not sure if it seems right or not. I'm new to this shit.

Also is delidding shitty? I have never done it before. I'm kinda scared since I'm sure the 8700k heats up quite a bit.

All the locked CPU's are pointless since they're locked to Z370 though. To be honest Coffee lake is largely a failure, there's not a single CPU worth buying except the 8700K for the people who are willing to pay as much money as possible for 1080p/240fps.

Muricaaa fuck yeahh

No need to delid, goyim. And Ryzen does not exist.

>1600x is only $10 more expensive than the 1600 on my list - neat
>no stock cooler
rused again

You could probably see the difference even with a GTX 1070. Regardless, if I were to buy a new CPU right now, I'd make sure to buy one that can keep almost any game above 60FPS in non-GPU limited situations. I know that I can slightly lower graphics settings and significantly improve framerates, but I can't do the same if there's a CPU bottleneck (excluding the draw distance setting, which can help alleviate CPU bottleneck). The R3 1200 with an OC is right on the edge of that 60FPS AVERAGE mark (which means there will be drops).. so I'd be very tempted by the i3 8100.

i have checked the benchmarks. in the end, the 8700K is still a 6 core that costs $400 without a cooler. the 1700 is an 8 core that costs $300 with a great cooler. add in mobo costs, and you're paying over $200 for 2 less cores and mostly marginal fps increases.
a 8700K/1080 build costs more than a 1700/1080Ti build, with the latter being far superior.

was more expensive than 3000mhz & 3200
amazon.de/dp/B015HDO33E/ref=twister_B06Y2DSKQ7?_encoding=UTF8&th=1

Handles are dumb, go LianLi or Fractal. Modular PSU is a must.

>All the locked CPU's are pointless since they're locked to Z370 though
What is upgrade path? What is fast RAM? B and H chipsets will be limited to 2400MHz RAM with the i3s otherwise. It's the Intel tax.

>To be honest Coffee lake is largely a failure, there's not a single CPU worth buying
Embarrassingly naive. Clearly the i3 8100 and the i5 8400 are both awesome for the price. How many times do I have to cite this benchmark before you shut the fuck up with your unfounded claims?

Oh and Silverstone are quite good at mITX

>What is upgrade path?
What upgrade path? You realize the 300-series is a one gen platform? There is just Coffee lakeand nothing else, Ice Lake is a new socket. And what's the point of upgrading an i5 8400? 6C/6T to 6C/12T for $300? What a steal! And that benchmark isn't that impressive, I don't understand why you keep spamming links to it. Honestly I believe all Intel processors should be removed from the OP until Spring 2018 except the used Xeon part. Maybe the 8700k for high refresh rate gaming, but it's a massive ripoff still.

I mean I am, all major drivers get installed before I plug in the network cable

Who's talking about the i7 8700K exclusively? No one. There are a bunch of other CPUs in the Coffee Lake lineup. Anyway for gaming the R7 1700 is marginally better than the R5 1600. You're lost in the "moar coars" marketing without understanding the performance benefits or lack thereof that come with "moar coars."

If you're playing at 1440p 144Hz with a 1080Ti an i5 8400 is the CPU to get. Pairing an R7 1700 with a 1080Ti is stupid. The R7 is a productivity chip, so your hypothetical "1700/1080Ti" build is NOT "far superior" and in fact is INFERIOR.

Check. benchmarks.

just got pic related and have an i5 4670k and was wondering if that would be a bottleneck?

>What upgrade path?
Considering we're talking about about starting from an i3 8100, obviously the i5 8400 or i7 8700 would both be huge upgrades.

>And that benchmark isn't that impressive
It's to keep your Ryzen fantasies in check. Notice that you can basically max out all games at 1080p with a sub 200USD chip (the i5 8400).

>Honestly I believe all Intel processors should be removed from the OP until Spring 2018
Clearly you're a fanboy, considering you can't even see that the i5 8400 is amazing for high refresh rate gaming.

>kaby lake
>coffee lake
what is with these gay names?

The i5 won't bottleneck a 1060.

Is it worth having an SSD for windows only and a HDD for everything else? Will I see any benefit other than boot times, like general speed within windows?

>Who's talking about the i7 8700K exclusively? No one. There are a bunch of other CPUs in the Coffee Lake lineup.
yes, and none of them are better than the 1700 when it comes to price to performance.
>Anyway for gaming the R7 1700 is marginally better than the R5 1600.
if you are willing to spend over $1000 on a pc for just gaming, you're retarded. its the same reason why nobody recommends 8 gigs of ram anymore. multi tasking, streaming, video editing, etc. are so common, and the 2 cores are a significant advantage, especially when its $200 cheaper.
>The R7 is a productivity chip, so your hypothetical "1700/1080Ti" build is NOT "far superior" and in fact is INFERIOR.
the productivity chip is only marginally worse for gaming, but clearly superior overall. as i said before, a 1700/1080Ti build is clearly superior to a cuck lake build.

any good reason not to buy this

i have a 1070

>$400
fuck I wish I was a yank

you go 1, 3 or 1 & 1 vertical

2 is retarded

ok im going to be honest i have no idea what you are trying to say here

>$400 for 144Hz anything
fuck me it would almost be cheaper to FLY to america buy parts then fly back

Palit GTX 1060 w/ 6G Micron for 310 USD
or
Palit GTX 1060 w/ 3G Samsung for 260 USD

Will probably play PUBG, it's very unoptimized, so probably more VRAM will be handy, right?
Are 3 gigs of slightly lower clocked memory worth ~50 bucks? I'm not in USA btw. Thanks in advance.

If I want to stream/game/edit with 1440p 165hz, what is a solid build? Budget is about $2500. Ideally I want a 1080ti, maybe a 7700k. I'm not sure I want to wait to get the new 8000s that are out. I'm not sure how long the wait will be and it will be extra money to spend for potentially not a crazy amount of performance boost.

If anyone could send me a build, I would be forever grateful.