Was it an invasion?

Was it an invasion?

Other urls found in this thread:

sbs.com.au/news/article/2014/03/10/myths-persist-about-1967-referendum
twitter.com/AnonBabble

No, genocide

It was a righteous conquest to quell the rampant child rape, cannibalism, and other foul deeds perpetrated by the aboriginal tribes.

Was the Anglo-Saxon invasion on Britania an invasion? I guess so, but current English are the descendants of the invaders.

Same with this.

if there were no humans there, it wasn't an invasion.

There was already a civilisation on Britannia
There was no such thing on Australia

Yes, but this is not relevant. What I mean is that current Australians are descendants of British settlers/colonists, like the English are descendants of Anglo-Saxon settlers/colonists.

It is very ridiculous to see a British talking shit about Anglo-Saxon colonization, as is absurd to see an Australian talkin shit about British colonization.

>MFW Abos were literally considered part of the native flora and fauna until the 1960s

Holy fuck i am actually fucking autisitc i got so worked up trying to take a decent photo in the dark that im now fucking lost somewhere jesus christ im going to be out in this area for fuckknows how long because i wanted to showoff to some fucking baltic people on a french fishing forum FUCK. Its cold and windy and dark and i wanna fucking go home

Australians did nothing wrong.

Fuck off dago. No "British" talks shit about Anglo-Saxon coloniSation you twat.

>No "British" talks shit about Anglo-Saxon

I know, because that would be too ridiculous. Same level of ridiculouness as an Australian talking shit about British colonisation.

I kek every time

No more so than the colonisation of the Ainu islands.

for real?
topkek

what about celts?

no its a myth
sbs.com.au/news/article/2014/03/10/myths-persist-about-1967-referendum

Yes and we WON.

Both, and there's literally nothing wrong with either.
We should have finished the job. Instead we're stuck with unassimilated but dependent natives, and constant propaganda undermining Australian national identity.

If you think any white australians are the ones calling it an invasion you're confused. It's the Abos finding more things to complain about

You're right, Brits committed all the wrongs since it wasn't Australia that invaded

Any fuss thrown up is more about cultural shit slinging than receiving reparations.

The English are around 60% Briton blood and at the most 40% Anglo-Saxon anyway.

Unfortunately not true.

Seems like the conquest failed then.

>mfw britannia-kun did not give us the BWC
>mfw not part of the anglosphere

why did they let the an african nation colonize us?

why did they not give a shit about s.america?

I saw some Australian and New Zealand leftists groups talking shit about British flag and invasion.

>Was it an invasion?
I mean, sure, you could say that if you have no idea what the proper meaning of an invasion is. A genocide? maybe, there was killing going on, but not by any stretch an invasion.

>Australian and New Zealand leftists

You could just say "homosexuals" instead 2bh

they're complaining on behalf of abos though

RIP

din du nuffin

Abos literally could not be trusted with """"their"""" own land
Abos literally burnt down all of the forests in Australia

I wonder what paradise we would be living in now if it wasn't for them fucktards

Central Australia and the outback are naturally dry and barren. Abos wouldn't have made a big difference ""burning"" it down