Alternative Router Firmware

Pic related has been great with patching vulnerabilities like wanacry/DNScrypt/Krack

The team is way more productive than OpenWRT and consists of a majority of the original devs and contributors

The only issue I have is ed25519 key support by default for dropbear

apparently it has support but has to be re-compiled to enable it

i noticed this exists
github.com/pts/pts-dropbear

anyone tried on OpenWRT/LEDE?
Could I install it with OPKG or would it need to be built into a package?

would it be less troubling to just install OpenSSH instead and remove DropBear?

I prefer the Luci GUI, would I still have access to OpenSSH via the GUI like I do with DropBear?

Inb4 just usa RSA

Other urls found in this thread:

bitbucket.org/pl_shibby/tomato-arm/issues/184/apparently-wpa2-protocol-is-vulnerable-to
git.lede-project.org/?p=source.git;a=commit;h=bbda81ce3077dfade2a43a39f772cfec2e82a9a5
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

idk why i expected legit answers from here.

this place went down the drain

Shut up faggot. You posted only a few minutes ago.

yet other useless threads riddle this sub

No hardware NAT support. pfsense is the best!

>pf

total shit, worst software ever

Then give me hardware NAT support. I have gigabit speeds. I don't want to waste the bandwidth I have.

Until that's not fixed LEDE is shit.

pfsense is nice but i only need lede for a AP

I just use dd-wrt. Firmware is all pre-packaged, regularly updated, and has all the important options available by default in the web gui.

Also recent builds support hardware NAT.

pfsense is too big to run on a atheros with less that 4MB

now if you dont have any suggestions to the OP at hand then i dont understand what your point is?

pfsense is superior in plenty of aspects but the hardware im using doesnt have support so its not worth mentioning

not sure what that has to do with elliptical curve algos

The thing is that no lantiq support for DD-WRT. Except one Buffalo router. And unfortunately LEDE devs are just lazy. Promising project but they still cannot decide if they will stick with LEDE or OpenWrt name. I read that thing on the mailing list but simply nothing has been done since.

Well under powered, slow hardware with limited flash. You can only use those. However if you get something better you can have a comfy pfsense setup.

they arent lazy.
they have pushed the kernel further than openwrt and have patched multiple vulnerabilities since chaos calmer

i actually have one for my routing and firewall combined with snort and squid but this thread isnt about pfsense

its about embedded linux on low powered devices(a 5ghz AP) involving elliptic curve and you are shitting up the thread

What should I install on an Archer C7 v2?

Wasn't LEDE going to re-merge with OpenWRT?

I run OpenWRT on mine.

> would I still have access to OpenSSH via the GUI like I do with DropBear?

You can't add private keys, if that's what you mean.
Also, if you sysupgrade, you have to reinstall it like any other optional package.
Unless you build your own images.

I have a bunch of the old C5 V1.2 I reflashed to C7.
Running LEDE on all of them.

> I run OpenWRT on mine.

Why, it's been almost dead for over two years.

hmmm LEDE it is, then

>still running picture related with tomato

is your tomato up to date?

unfortunately not, KRACK exploit still unpatched

bitbucket.org/pl_shibby/tomato-arm/issues/184/apparently-wpa2-protocol-is-vulnerable-to

>Wasn't LEDE going to re-merge with OpenWRT?

The OpenWRT codebase has been stale for well over a year. If it happens, the "merge" will simply overwrite the old OpenWRT codebase with LEDE codebase.

For all practical purposes, LEDE 17.01 is the new up-to-date stable branch of OpenWRT, and LEDE master is the new development branch.

Only the OpenWRT name is missing from LEDE, so the "merge" is essentially about renaming the current LEDE to OpenWRT.

It appears KRACK has been fixed in LEDE master with this commit:

git.lede-project.org/?p=source.git;a=commit;h=bbda81ce3077dfade2a43a39f772cfec2e82a9a5