I plan to reformat some disks and I'm interested in file systems different from ext4 and all info related what I found is very old...
From my superficial research looks like: XFS = better I/O (probably good for BitTorrent) BTRFS = more reliable cuz better data integrity, copy on write, etc. (Looks good for a backup disk or sd cards maybe?)
But there are a ton of threads, forum topics about them (all over 5-8 years old) with many doubts about its stability. How are these file systems today? Does anyone here use anything other than ext4? >inb4 ntfs, refs, fuse memes. I'm talking about real file systems
I'm sorry, but what the fuck is wrong with you?! Is she nearly-naked or am I missing something?! She looks about 12! >inb4 anime website Kill yourself you deplorable scum. Lolis are an attempt to rationalise pedophilia.
Michael Collins
>/r/eddit
Luis Morales
Poor attempt at feeling relevant when you aren't. I give you a 2/10.
Adam Mitchell
Btrfs is fine as long as you don't try to use RAID 5/6/10.
Grayson Wood
can someone explain how that little girl doesn't fall while putting all her weight at the edge of the chair? japs cannot into physics
Elijah Howard
The chair is on a carpet and the loli is too weightless to have any effect on the chair. There, i gave you as intellectual of an answer as the question you posed.
Aaron Bennett
Has anyone tried F2FS?
James Moore
What a waste of trips.
Josiah Campbell
no difference for normal users. i use bsd fs. die weebs btw
Henry Jenkins
but she is moving, that create more instability. Also being naked minimize traction against the chair.
Ian Collins
She isn't moving. Clearly that's a png and not a gif you mongrel.
>wiki.ubuntu.com/ZFS >Currently, as of January 2015, it is native to Solaris, OpenSolaris, OpenIndiana, illumos, Joyent SmartOS, OmniOS, FreeBSD, Debian GNU/kFreeBSD systems, NetBSD, OSv and supported on Mac OS with MacZFS.
Dylan Taylor
Aside from height, all anime girls look the same age, they're just drawn that way. It doesn't even matter because it's a drawing. Girls don't have eyes that take up half their face or mouths that magically appear on one side of the face when facing sideways.
Lucas Garcia
>i'm going to avoid the point all together
You just gave more reasons as to why it's worse than regular prdophilia.
Adam Morgan
i dont see the point of something like btrfs being used on one disk
if you're on a single disk workstation just use ext4 or xfs if you need it
Jace Brown
Support for snapshots and backups.
Though I guess you could just the device mapper or lvm if you wanted that level of precision with other filesystems.
Anthony Smith
>You just gave more reasons
Which ones? I find it hard to take you seriously when you keep displaying that you're incapable of reasoning like an adult.
John Williams
XFS have integrated auto-defragmentation, mah boi
Elijah Brown
i started using btrfs and snapper for snapshots
it's pretty great. i'm sharing subvolumes with containers and automatic backup that takes up minimal space and it's actually possible to boot the snapshots
Colton Gutierrez
Indeed that one looks really good for torrenting.
Joseph Cooper
More like it avoids fragmentation to begin with. It’s a very good choice for high-bandwidth applications.
As far as BT goes, any modern filesystem will do (so anything that doesn’t have the 1980s design of indexing free space using bitmaps, like ext4 and NTFS do). XFS and btrfs have very cheap allocations (e.g. 16 terabytes in a few milliseconds), which is why the BitTorrent client can just allocate space in advance with no performance penalty, and why XFS does dynamic speculative preallocation. That means it automatically preallocates space for growing files. It is also smart enough to put “related” files into the same allocation group, such as when you’re dumping video frames or 3D renders, to maximize bandwidth on disk-based storage.
Josiah Nguyen
kek
Lincoln Davis
I have, modern Android phones someone's use F2FS, I use it for my flash drives that are only use on Linux systems It just werks I use BTRFS as my main filesystem, specially on spinning rust devices and other slow drives, compression can improve performance
Hunter Brown
>tfw WinFS will never exist.
When will someone have the guts to do what M$ didn't? Make the perfect filesystem.
Camden Ortiz
APFS > *
Justin Rogers
How do I preserve 100+ GB of documents and images each one smaller than 1GB for more than 10 years? Should I use a raid setup on 2 new hard drives using ZFS/BTRFS? should I do the same but on good SSDs? or should I use other file system?
Nathan Martin
whats the general consensus on killyourwifeFS?
James Davis
No advantages and overall gay.
David Miller
Your use case is dumping data from BT to a single HDD?
No really important difference between any of these. Basically, throw a dice or just use ext4.
Levi Bell
No longer an interesting choice, the other FS' just are better.
Levi Gutierrez
I want my wife to live.
Jacob Gonzalez
pifs masterrace
Lucas Hall
Redundancy and verification.
RAID6 or a replication on like 6+2 erasure code cloud storage that is scrubbed maybe bi-weekly or so is a good guess. Add par data (less frequently used for verification) so you can ALSO get secondary confirmation and a degree of repair capability on the data side.
And then another backup copy.
Jaxon Gutierrez
I'm heterosexual
Connor Ramirez
Test and see. ZFS and btrfs are oddballs, covering fs and software RAID and partioning/logical volumes. For basic single disk usage, XFS is probably going to be the best performer, and very reliable. More than btrfs from the point of view that there are readily available told for recovering from it. Ext4 supports shrinking AND growing the fs, which I know xfs doesn't do, and I thought btrfs & zfs didn't either (but someone please correct me if I'm wrong). If you want built in snapshotting or the ability to do crazy redundancy with RAIDZ (go beyond RAID6!) ZFS. If you just want speed XFS. If you want everything to play nice with you, ext3 or ext4.
Mason Rogers
I'd rather talk about your picture OP, sauce?
Brandon Sullivan
100 GB is like 4 Blu-ray discs. 2 if they are dual-layer.
Just get a bunch of Blu-rays for redundancy, do some fancy par thing like said and you should be good.
Jeremiah Bennett
PS: With all of this, you do have a good guarantee.
1. It's unlikely that 2 drives fail very quickly before you replace them. unless you don't fucking monitor them at all, it probably won't happen.
2. It's unlikely that you get any corruption of data or operator mistake that not only checks out as sane with the array / cloud (which it could if you, say, "fixed" it the wrong way and it ended up marked clean), but also with the PAR parity data.
3. If you notice and the primary copy is fucked regardless of you actually having multiple chances to restore it fully, it's really damn near impossible that your final backup is also fucked.
Just make it has similar properties as the main copy- it was verified some time not insanely long ago, it has parity data, and it's not just one non-redundant copy.
Camden Johnson
Look its filename This is probably a good idea. It's cheap and I remember to read somewhere that bd disk are very durable.
Dylan Garcia
>not a doujin lame but thanks
Nolan King
XFS is more reliable to BTRFS for single disk usage? I thought XFS is faster but BTRFS safer.
Ryder Bell
Yea, Blu-ray are pretty suitable.
Granted, in the old days there were CD and DVD that fell apart on their own over time, and some more that really lost data quickly if the sun shone on them.
They *probably* didn't fuck up BD in the same way, but I'd at least advise against just making it a single set of BD and letting them sit in cold storage without ever testing them for 10 years. If the disks are flawless, then maybe you still had the idea to, like, drill the wall on the other side where that box was. Or your wife threw dusty boxes away...
Basically, make multiple copies. Test them after 2 or 4 or so years (to have a chance to catch a partial failure of sorts). Yes, it'll hopefully turn out to be wasted effort, but you just don't easily know.
Robert Mitchell
>Also being naked minimize traction against the chair. Actually the opposite is true. Don't ask me how I know. Trust me.
Robert Mitchell
Not same user, but which one is actually more reliable is almost impossible to tell, as far as I'm concerned.
XFS still has more steady throughput than BTRFS in my experience.
Carson Brooks
Ok anons, got some questions here.
First, is there any consensus on whether F2FS actually is good for a PC? So like if I had a laptop with an SSD in there, would it be best to partition things as F2FS? Also, I've been thinking about JFS, as it's listed as an option on both Arch and Sup Forumsentoo. I've heard it's better for your CPU or something, but most of the info talking about that is from fuckin 2003. Also, I heard it's unstable.
>inb4 jewgle it
Leo Price
bcachefs
Oliver Scott
Friction of her butt against the chair keeps her in place. Haven't you ever computered naked except for a pair of cozy stockings?
Jaxon Nelson
From the point of view that there are more tools for recovery and repair of xfa, if it needs it.
If you don't include that, there's no difference in reliability. Seriously, both are rock solid.
Thomas Williams
CD and DVD used organic dyes for the data layer. BD, I think, uses something inorganic/metallic for its data layer so it's a lot more resistant to bitrot. If you're really paranoid, you could just use something like M-Disc which is essentially using better versions of the standard BD data layer materials. They're still compatible with standard BD writers.
Aiden Ortiz
center of weight is clearly over the leg of the chair
Angel Wright
>EXT4 Tried and tested. Works unless the medium is failing. Bit of space overhead.
>XFS Fast as fuck when layered on shit like Ceph or LVM. Slight random I/O boost in some situations. Very slight. Good on both HDDs and SSDs.
>BTRFS the tinkerer's advanced FS Go nuts, compress your shit, checksums to identify damaged files, CoW can keep shit in supremely fine order, offline dedup, do unorthodox shit with some assurance of data integrity
>ZFS >Recovery tools? What recovery tools? Is the filesystem stable or is it S T A B L E? Oh and you also can't shink or remove vdevs. And dedup will cost an arm and a leg. No native fstab or mounting support but the volume manager is godly.
>F2FS Want a removable flash device that functions like it damn well should? Automatically minimizes writes. Stalls a bit under high write I/O while it attempts to lessen the write amplification. Pull your flash drive after shit transfers and feel safe that it's actually synced to the drive. REALLY fast random I/O on SSDs.
Andrew Roberts
Bcachefs
Easton Perry
This one looks pretty new compared to the others. I'm not sure if I want to give it a try.
Lincoln Reyes
It's the filesystem I'm most hopeful for so far. Better architecture than btrfs (and so should be much better for supporting more advanced filesystem features like tiered storage, object level raid, etc). Benchmarks well so far, development is moving reasonably quickly for a single-person project. It's surely not "production ready" yet, but I've tried it virtualized for fun.
Jacob Martin
*Most hopeful for as a new standard Linux filesystem suitable for file servers, like ZFS, but also stable and appropriate for normal workstation use.
Christian Cooper
>not using btrfs or zfs in raid10 Sucks to be you.
David Allen
It works fine with raid10. Raid10 is a stripped mirror.
Logan Harris
I just tried this exact position and didn't fall so it's physically possible
Dylan Rodriguez
Her com is over the chair leg. Are you blind?
Aaron Bailey
>Also being naked minimize traction against the chair Skin with moisture has more friction than normal fabric, even more if that a leather chair.
Brayden Stewart
you lied to me, i was expecting something good
Easton Diaz
Maki is a cutie
Josiah Moore
You said we were the degenerates because one of our mods (someone who doesn't represent us at all) had CP.
But you're unironically posting naked children here.
Disgusting.
Levi White
So much this, but I don't expect the OP to take that advice since it hasn't been mainlined yet.
Brandon Young
>crossdressing shotas ew
Hunter Flores
>wearing nothing >crossdressing
Austin Reed
>having a waifu >"she is not real loser!" >posting loli >"stop posting CP, fag"
fucking normies, when they will learn.
Alexander Davis
Who is this semen demon
John Edwards
>shota > Programming socks = girl. It's basic math
Jayden Brooks
>children Where?
Colton Moore
But I wear programming socks and I'm a boy
Hudson Martin
Who still reiserfs here?
Benjamin Myers
Last time I heard, it got pretty much killed for shit unrelated to the FS itself.
Julian Torres
I only use HFS, HFS+, NTFS and variations of FAT, why would you need another fyle system?
Daniel Walker
>NTFS Oops we accidentally deleted all your indexes :^)
Hudson Rogers
You can't have everything
Dominic Torres
...
Jace Russell
...
Dominic Richardson
I bet you weeb degenerates would lick off the stains of a chair if you knew a loli left them.
Ryan Howard
Of course I would. I may be a virgin but I'm not a faggot.
Jordan Ramirez
See where all the semen and gleet drips from her filthy snizz.
Jackson Clark
>gleet Had to google that
Benjamin Watson
the only file system you need is redsea
Eli Rodriguez
Retard.
Henry Garcia
It's tagged as 1girl in danbooru.
Justin Carter
The drawer of that pic is known to be keen on shota wearing female legwear
Leo Young
Stop talking out of you're ass
Henry Nguyen
> not searching on the artist's personal page LUL I don't mean to shatter your illusions user, keep on believing that the girl in the pic is female