When will Sup Forums get heif and hevc support?

When will Sup Forums get heif and hevc support?

never ever because it's pointless

when will I have gf support?

>never ever because it's pointless
why do you think it's pointless? They are objectively superior to webm and webp.

Proprietary garbage.
AV1 will rule internet video.

I regret making that stupid sissy shirt.
I can't even take it off the redbubble store because the pattern sold more than 20 times.

Need pay enormous royals.

dakooters wouldn't post on Sup Forums

use your trip if you actually are

How much did you make from selling that?

'cuz AV1 soon(tm).

We never got .apng support back in 2014 because it wasn't natively supported in Chrom* at the time, and moot was up to his neck in google shit even back then. Will hiro finally give us what we want?

she makes like $60 a month or less
nothing significant

probably less now the succubus (male) meme died

Why doesn't Sup Forums support apngs? It requires zero effort because they are completely backwards compatible and just add a few new chunks for frames.

Like I said, it's because apng wasn't supported natively in Chrome back when moot was around so he never added it. He, I quote, said on /q/ "We aren't adding APNG support. Shit is going nowhere fast and I have zero interest in supporting it. That's that." and agreed with a user who said "APNGs are a gimmick that no browser besides Firefox ever plans to support." when at the time only Chrome and IE didn't support it and just about every other browser did (if I'm remembering right). Only IE and Edge don't support it now but who cares about those browsers? I severely doubt the majority of users on this site use either of those.

There's really no reason to have it now.

>cuteboy.jpg

>he thinks he has an objective opinion

That's some interesting historical information, but it's not really my point. Sup Forums doesn't need to "implement" anything. As far as I know they don't do any processing of images besides removing metadata. It requires zero work on their end. In fact they actually have to add code to detect and block apngs.

As far as using apngs in 2017, well people are still uploading gifs. In almost all cases you will get a smaller file size by converting to apng. I think it will even do better than webms for small resolutions or drawn content (which is mainly what people use webms for here anyway.)

The story of APNG is tragic. The original developers insisted people use their retarded MNG format for animated content. They refused to add animation to the PNG standard. So gifs continued on for 2 decades after they should have died.

And because it's an unofficial standard, it's a complete hack. It has no support for interframe compression which even GIF has. It could have been much better than it is.

Enjoy ur botnet

This tbqhwyf

never ever because it's pointless

VP9 webm > HEVC shit > VP8 webm

how can Sup Forums support hevc when no browser except safari supports it

>VP9 webm > HEVC shit
webm is fucking garbage. encoding times 10000x slower then mp4/hvec

But don't you want a warm wet hole for your dick and fun bags to squeeze?

nothing matters more than freedom

ok here i am, you've summoned me
my roommate told me about this thread so
hi

why quoting the whole fucking post are you a retard

webm is just lighter that's the only reason we are using it

well you can pay your internet and services with 60/mo that's not that bad