Removable then lasting

removable then lasting

removable > long lasting > fast charging

Are the three somehow mutually exclusive with each other?

they're not, i assume op meant "if you could only have one"

if by long lasting you mean bigger capacity(more millamps) then that. I never understood the removable batter meme. I have had the same phone for 3 years now and I'm about to replace it anyways. I feel for the business guys who need to talk 24/7 and switch out the batteries but that is edge case use id imagine.

I had a Xiaomi mi note pro with a 4000mAh and within a year it degraded from lasting 2 days to lasting me less than one entire day.

They arent exactly long lasting

having a removable battery means that you can just buy a new battery and replace it yourself when the first one starts getting faulty by the pass of the years, you can't do that with a sealed phone so easily

removable and it boots fast

Removable in that case. I can always charge during night and at my work desk, so I don't have a real need for fast & long-lasting.

>I never understood the removable batter meme
>battery degrades over time
>stops holding charge
>replace it

Nobody is carrying around a set of spare batteries to swap during the day. Yoy replace your battery once it gets shitty

and most people here are probably competent enough to change fixed batteries. I stand by my position.

same
as long as it can last from morning to night, longer is just convinient, you can charge overnight, in your car, or just a powerbank if really neccesary
and you can also carry additional batteries, fast charging? what's faster than swapping your battery for a fully charged one?

I think phones should have two batteries and an external charging station.
Then you can hotswap batteries like on a lenono computer.
Phones are about that size soon anyway.

Well I have a 4 years old lg g2 and the battery isn't that noticable bad from the first day i bought it

lots of people dont even need that much battery, my entire family has already got used to charge their phones every night, if their phone can hold up a charge from morning until night, then it's alright for them

I think phones should require an AC outlet and be stationary

I replaced my S6 of 2 years with an OEM s7 edge battery

Now it has 9 hours of screen on time compared to the normal 2 hours.

Instead of having removable batteries i'd much prefer if it were easier to source OEM batteries

this is a good point I was also thinking of. High quality controlled well made battery would be great.

Ayy, I plan on doing this to my S6 tomorrow actually. I got a few questions if you don't mind.

Did you remove the NFC/Wireless charge coil? Does the back cover buldge or pop out? And do you use fast charging?

can i just get a moto z and add/replace the extra battery packs?

I mean thats both long lasting and at least half replaceable.

Someone post the Sup Forums phone image.

Between long lasting and fast charging, I pick long lasting for sure. It takes ~2-3 hours to fully charge my Redmi Note 4X, but it also gets 12+ hours SOT and can easily last 2 days with moderate to heavy use. Not ever having to think about my phone's battery level is pure bliss.
Compare that to a fast charging phone with meh battery life, where you'll still be looking for outlets, lugging around chargers, and thinking about battery drain in daily use. The peace of mind you get with a long battery life is a luxury.

Long lasting > Removable > Fast charging


Reminder, you should NEVER let your phone go below 50%. If your battery goes under 50%, its lost nearly half its life already.

Why is this a radio button poll. Make it a checkbox poll, you dumb imbecil in the unknowing.

Removable > everything else simply because you can replace stock sizes with expanded mAh batteries.