/brit/

publix edition

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=rztqtTX_8c0
youtube.com/watch?v=rTfa-9aCTYg
youtu.be/ME0nzWmcd5s
moralmachine.mit.edu/
youtube.com/watch?v=Hw__B24L-70
moralmachine.mit.edu/results/1152115569
moralmachine.mit.edu/results/287068611
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

/cum/

simsonwave tb h fa m
m.youtube.com/watch?v=rztqtTX_8c0

HEHAHAHAHAHA LET'S MAKE SHIT EDITIONS 10 POSTS TOO EARLY XDDD /CUM/ FTW!!!

even the original monkey musical was better than this shit.

We out here, we out here

alri there janny

so, so good

this one is my favourite youtube.com/watch?v=rTfa-9aCTYg

sometimes wish my gf actually was fucking Jamal so i'd have an excuse to break up with her, boring girl

then i remember we're living in rural middle of nowhere and Jamals don't exist out here

taking bets this is the same person

Freshly baked pizza
Direct to door, paid through Paypal
Dismay on deliverycucks rain teared face
No cash, no fuss, no tip

literally all me

publix subs are pretty good, high-tier subs

youtu.be/ME0nzWmcd5s

>people are listening to non-hit songs

2/3 lad sorry

listening to british murder boys

sounds a bit gay

someone please end my suffering

Is there a newbie guide for picking mushshrooms? All I've noticed are fat capped ones anyway

Swiss autistic cunt fuck off

>humidity: 26%

howling

what posseses people to unironically live in the middle of a desert

This triggers the lisicki

just dry heat mate

fuck off. it's 98% humidity. 30 degrees at 98% humidity is far worse than 40 at 20%.

techno so yeh kinda

Cannot think of a moment in history where the British government was tyrannical and did bad things to people who didn't deserve it

im FREE to do as i please

"This city should not exist, it is a monument to mans arrogance"

Do americans really live in a fucking desert?

You're insane.

there are spots but i'll never tell you mine, and my close relatives won't even tell me theirs.

either very uneducated or turbororke which is it?

trevalyon was a fuckin cunt

>This city should not exist, it is a monument to mans arrogance

*Casually fondles my willy in public*

turbororke

people are posting kevs photos on Sup Forums saying hes lisicki hahahaha

>chose to live in a desert
>complains that it's too hot

Id wait until you learn to recognize them easily before going out alone and just picking random ones.

Really makes you think
What was his fucking problem?
What did he mean by this?
Bane?
HOWEVER

...

at least the aussies were forced to live in the desert
yanks just decided to go live there one day
crazy fucks

dare i say it

No he wasn't

...

Lads lets see how moral you all are. Post results

moralmachine.mit.edu/
Go on shroomery.org there are loads of guide on it.

...

yes he was
>hmmm millions starvin eh?
>lets build some pointless roads instead of stopping exports haha
all under the excuse of muh free markets when building useless money off government money is literally the opposite of the free market
and dont get me started on providencialists

*teleports behind u*
*kills everybody else except u leaving you standing and surroundered by dismembered bodies and you shit yourselfv because you're so blown away by my mighty power*

heh it's just banter m8

>most saved character
>women
>not the family or child, just women

How will food get to the people without roads Yank?

It's a young child female you fucking abo cunt

Think he's Welsh

*building useless roads
why not build some ports and developing fishing resources? roads dont feed people. neither do workhouses. food feeds people
there were already roads retard, the roads that were built during the famine were literally just for """"""aid""""""" to give people jobs on starvation wages. of course the pennies that were flung at paddy couldnt feed a family of 12 anyway with food prices skyrocketing so it didnt matter

Explains it

If people were starving clearly the roads were not fit for purpose.

youtube.com/watch?v=Hw__B24L-70

>how will roads get to the people without roads yank
creasing at this retard
this basically.

>libertarians would rather build roads than feed people

explain me, how can roads feed someone when theres no food to ship?
silly prod

Notice me

Calm down cunt hadn't taken the test there is no young child female in your picture, assumed it was the female in the males vs females section.

moralmachine.mit.edu/results/1152115569

they were government projects actually
hypocritical as fuck
in a national emergency food is a priority, not pushing your shitty ideals and saying "god dun did it nuffn ta do m8 god save the queen chop chop"

Share links are broken mate

I wasn't being offensive, just making a correction to the other poster

My problem with this test is I showed absolutely 0 gender preference but if the same amount of people would die and it was split by gender I chose do no swerve. In every example of that it meant killing only or more men. Bad test.

Howling

But more men died than women by your actions, they design it so that a same amount are able to die

didn't factor weight or gender into my decision process so thats purely coincedental

Then you didn't do it with moral or ethical intention which was the whole point

>fitness preference: large people

FOY

i am a perfectly rational asexual

morality is bullshit

oh dear

honestly i didn't even notice some were larger than others

Wow watch out there xX_____k1ll3r__s0ci0p4th4lyfe____Xx

more like gaysexual hahaha

I keep seeing shitty tabloids publishing that the crown is going to skip over Charles and go straight to William.
Is this true?

>I wasn't being offensive, just making a correction to the other poster

Same mate

You misunderstand. In the man vs woman test you can either swerve to hit the woman or continue to hit the man. I chose continue as I was putting equal value on men and women of the same age and role (robber/child/suitcase etc). I believe swerving to hit someone is different than carrying on to hit someone. Debateable sure but that's my belief. In every single man vs woman test swerving meant hitting the woman and continuing meant hitting the man. Therefore the only time I didn't hit the man is if there was a man on both sides or there was an age gap.

Maybe the test is randomised and I got a bad one but it shows an excessive gender gap that wasn't taken into consideration.

moralmachine.mit.edu/results/287068611

>proud immigrant

Wait a second I'll just ask the Queen.

Can't stop farting

>Go to one of the other boards that women go to
>Can tell male and female posts apart because the women's posts are insufferably passive aggresive at all times
wew

AC doesn't go lower than 18c

Never been a fan of the old tricolour 2bqh

Haha so funny xD He's from Romania literally anywhere in UK is better than there
I know what you're saying basically;
You aren't the one continuing, it's the self-driving car. You have the option to manually control the car to swerve. Letting a self-driving car completely plow into people is immoral because you have the option to swerve it, this would make you a murderer. So it's just wheter or not you would want to become a murderer and you would have to value this with saving the lives you value more.

It's a very hard moral dilemma 2bh.

might LITERALLY die here

Lads how much do youtubers get made for a video that gets a million views

how?

i think a lot would depend on who was in the car with you. if it was your f︃amily i think you'd plow into innocents and delude yourself into thinking they might be ok because instincts.

The irish?

Not a fan

in this situation you're the self driving car, or it's designer, you're compeltely uninterested and only obey the laws of logic and morality you have.

Also have to think of the chances that if you go straight ahead, there's the chance the people will cross in time. If this was the case then driving straight would be the best way no matter what

yeh i know i don't know why i made that comment

I was seeing it really as a self driving car should always put its passengers ahead of other people. I'd never buy a car that did differently and if I was the driver and I had a chance to think before I swerve (obviously gut reaction differes between people and Ive never had this happen to me) I would always save myself over someone else, or even a group of people.

However if you are in the situation where you have a man in the way, if you continue he will die but the only direction to swerve will kill a woman (and you absolutely know it will kill her as the test is protrayed). I would not say swerve. Choosing to end one life to save another is a different thing to accidentally ending a life. If the genders were reversed I woudl say the exact same thing, continue on. Unfortunately the lead to a coincidental gender bias in my test ut from what I'm seeing the situations are different for everybody.

well in this hypothetical scenario we have to assume we (and the car) know they aren't going to get out of the way so maybe they're lying on the floor or something

Ah, the sweaty stench of my ballsack is infatuating

i chose to kill men so theres more pussy for me
r8

the entire north sea belongs to iceland

Ah, just remembered that ginger lad in our social circle dressed up as a leprechaun on st paddys

The Irish were created for amusement