This is the Polish Leader in Civilization VI, Saint Queen Hedwig

This is the Polish Leader in Civilization VI, Saint Queen Hedwig.

Post your leader from the newest Civ, tell me if the person deserved.

Queen Hedwig was quite based and I don't mind her being our leader in the new civ.

Other urls found in this thread:

goodreads.com/author/show/2099433.Armand_Jean_du_Plessis_Richelieu
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>not confirmed

Don't worry she won't be included :)

The leak is pretty much confirmed and I don't mind Jadwiga.

Also, reposting from Sup Forums.

Only 18 out of those 24 will be included. Your country is too irrelevant to appear in base game. Hope for DLC at best.

> poolish post about pooland

kill yourself, idiot

Go and make a "humililate Poland" thread you autist piece of shit.

>Catherine de Médicis
We could've got Louis XIV, Napoléon, De Gaulle or even Clémeanceau, JUST

Wanna bet? She's a woman, I'm 100% certain she's in.

what did she even achieve?

Wut? Are you on drugs, retard? Everybody shits on your irrelevant impoverished shothole, just stop establishing threads about it. Nobody is interested

End yourself you filthy subhuman.

Leave Poland, then.

>Poland
I stopped playing at III. When did they start adding all these shitty countries?

Who are you to tell me what to do, wacko?

It's Sup Forums you autistic imbecil, we can talk about any country we want, ours included. And people do want to talk about Poland, open your damn eyes
You're bloody autistic

>And people do want to talk about Poland

Nice delusions. Even if there is a thread about Poland
- it's always started by attentionwhoring Pole
- most of replies are by Poles

Your country is irrelevant and not so interesting. Deal with it m8.

Post your leader from the newest Civ

Forgot my >

She looks hot tbqh

We've got good old "Montezuma" they still can't get the name right...

To be honest there are a lot of good choices in Aztec history, Moctezuma Ilhuicamina (great builder) Ahuizotl (mythical warrior) Acamapichtli (diplomat and first ruler) or even Nezahualcoyotl (who was techically not Mexica but still a part of the alliance and the greatest poet of the Nahuas). but Moctezuma II isn't bad, he's certainly iconographic and ruled the empire at it's peak. Most Mexicans would probably prefer Cuauhtémoc who led the last of the resistance against the Spaniards and is generally depicted as noble and heroic, even if he did surrender and was tortured.

I would love it f at some point they made mechanics which allowed peoples to change over time, have the Aztecs become Mexicans in the modern age, along with Cossacks ours was one of the last and most effective horsed warrior traditions...

I'm more favorable of Richelieu. Why they picked Catherine, other than a female quota, is to get a country to fill the "cultural yet sneaky" role. Who's better than Richelieu?

>Sneaky bugger, de facto power behind king Louis XIII
>Had an extensive network of priests doubling as spies as far abroad as the Habsburg courts
>Manipulated his way through the 30 Years War, sending it as a Catholic Country into the war on the Protestant side and letting France emerge as the new superpower
>Loved building his chateau's
>Founded the Academie Française, regulating the French language
And on top of it all
>Has "brand power", everyone knows Richelieu because he was the bad guy from the Three Musketeers novel
>Nice facial hair

Replace the imperial guard with the royal musketeers, Catherine with Richelieu and... that's it.

As far as female rulers go, Victoria and Cleopatra make perfect sense. Catherine made me raise an eyebrow, but Tomyris made me throw up my hands and declare that the SJW scare guys are right. Literally her only claim to fame is that she killed Cyrus, and even that she didn't do personally. That's like saying RUSSIA STRONK because Napoleon's troops froze to death there.

>adding all these shitty countries?
Well USA was there from the start so I guess the answer is - the original Civilization.

The "female leader" thing was always one of the top priorities for them.

I wonder if Richelieu can be counted as a "leader" since he wans't a king or regent.

>I wonder if Richelieu can be counted as a "leader" since he wans't a king or regent.
He was debatably the first prime minister in history. If Bismarck counts (pro-tip: he does), then so does Richelieu.

Small correction: the first prime minister in the modern sense of the word.
goodreads.com/author/show/2099433.Armand_Jean_du_Plessis_Richelieu

In terms of government, this de jure made him second only to the king. De facto some considered him to be above the king. Nevertheless, as I emphasized before, this effectively makes him the equal of Bismarck who is a staple of the Civ series.

Can we stay being city states again?

I mean, he even became more powerful than the king at some point, but thats when people started to want to get rid of him.

You dont want the sultanate of Malacca as a civ ?

>tfw GDL is too irrelevant or just bundled with Poland to be in the game
feelsbadman

I've had a crush on Jadwiga for some time now desu

tfw founder of malacca is not even a local

>queen
Jadwiga was crowned as king.
Her husband would make more sense anyway.

What about scythia?
They are included in the game and not in your picture

d4

My bad

>Scythians are in because they had to fill a female leader quota
>Dacians and thracians aren't in even though they wuz literal kingz

Fucking retarded ass kikeraxiz niggers and their stupid shitty politics. Hope this tanks like Beyond Earth.

I wonder is she really was a qt.

Her really old paintings show her as one.

she was 1.80m user

She was probably higher than 90% man in those times.

Hell, I'm 185 so she'd be higher than me in proper heels.

>you will never be dominated by 1.80m magyarblood amazon, a Saint of the Catholic Church

why live

The 6'8" master Tsar was the best ruler of Russia ever probably, so yes, deserved.

Though, I can't imagine how tall he must've looked like in comparison with everyone else at that time.

*6'8" ft = around 205 cm

>The "female leader" thing was always one of the top priorities for them.
This, I'm waiting to see Merkel or Rosa Luxemburg or some shitty female.

What about Louise of Mecklenburg? You know, the woman that gave Napoleon a blowjob so he'd treat Prussia more kindly after ripping it a new asshole?

Sounds perfect for a modern representation of Germany.

Looks good

Cleopatra is a horrible decision for a female ruler of Egypt. She was merely a Roman Client who choose the wrong horse to ride. If they wanted a female ruler of Egypt that actually did something then they should have gone with Hatshepsut. Choosing Cleopatra for Egypt is like choosing Marie Antoinette for France.

>Cleopatra is a horrible decision for a female ruler of Egypt.
From a Western perspective, she's the most well-known Egyptian rule save for Ramses II, who was already in the last game.

>She was merely a Roman Client who choose the wrong horse to ride.
And that's precisely why she's famous: because of her intimate ties to Roman history. Purely from a Western perspective she matters more than a lot of other Egyptian rulers.

You could argue in favor of other Egyptian rulers, sure, but unlike with Catherine and Tomyris it's hard to argue she wasn't an important Egyptian ruler. Catherine wasn't a ruler, and Tomyris wasn't important.

Yeah I always considered Cleopatra more a failure than a ruler. I never understood why they always add her.

I think the "power" that the person had, had to be official, Richelieu was more of a guy in the shadow.