Wow, so this is the power of deep learning

wow, so this is the power of deep learning...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=gmYcoKWlxAM
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Hastings_(journalist)#Controversy_over_alleged_foul_play
youtube.com/watch?v=4hbqVme4wd0
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Singularity any day now, friend

Retard

if it's so smart, how come it didn't try to back up?

literally fake news in my Sup Forums board.

>smart car couldn't even simulate all of the possible outcomes and have reactions ready for every single possible one
"smart"

>Not really the kind of publicity you want, or what self-driving cars need.

>Intentionally makes really bad publicity article title

MEDIA=FAGS

Developers thought it everything.
Except the horn.
Who the hell backs up when someone is coming at you, just honk the shit out of them.

ban driverless cars before terroristic hackers drive them into parades

so its god damn fake news

What I'm more interested in:
How fast (or rather how slow) is it?

OK, I found a video here: youtube.com/watch?v=gmYcoKWlxAM

Worse than I thought.
- barely over walking speed.
- only drives on one road.
- gets freaked out by birds.
- still manages to nearly run the cameraman over because of a "blind spot".

I studied artificial intelligence in the 1990's and we had more advanced self driving cars back then.

>terroristic hackers
the cia?
they already hack non-smart cars
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Hastings_(journalist)#Controversy_over_alleged_foul_play

I honestly think all heavy vehicles in Europe should be equipped with automatic shut-offs that get activated when they hit something.

Even if they can be disabled it will at least stop terrorists relying on hijacked or rented vehicles.

No, it was in fact involved in an accident. Who's at fault is not an issue.

Honking is the correct response.

But honking barely ever makes a difference because it takes several seconds before people realize it's them you're honking at.

If someone is backing up into you you're almost certainly going to get scratched.
Not much you can do about it, automatic or non-automatic.

then why was I able to avoid getting hit in a similar situation by deciding to back up? I'm not even smart lol how can you call this thing smart

No, you didn't.

>Who's at fault is not an issue.
Then why is the title "Driverless shuttle in fender bender" and not "Dipshit trucker backs into traffic"? It's almost like it does matter for website traffic.

It was in a fender bender so it's accurate.

Your title would've been better though. kek

I'm not saying it's not accurate, I'm saying it's not news. Idiot truckers cause accidents every day, who they hit is irrelevant. But driverless cars are a hot topic right now, so they used that to get ad revenue by making people think something happened in a way that it didn't.

Back then they needed laser range scanners that costed $100k+ but yes we did.

Also the port of Rotterdam has been using self driving cranes to move containers around since the late 90's.
Those also seem more advanced that this crap.

>was hurt

A human driver would have prevented this.
Part of safe driving is predicting other people's behavior and dealing with unusual situations. AI can't do it.

What if there is a car behind you?

Not if the car was parked.
youtube.com/watch?v=4hbqVme4wd0

>none of the passengers was hurt.
>was hurt.

This is literally facebook clickbait, poorly written, by some retard that's looking for ad money.

took me a second to realize why you're right.

Instead of using "were hurt", the author wrote "was hurt" for search engine results because people will search more for that.

I looked in the mirror and there wasn't anyone. Don't these things have sensors that give them 360 degrees vision at all times?

>cia niggers the only terroristic hackers on planet earth
nice meme

You'd need a couple of seconds to respond.

Honking and having the reversing driver respond by braking should be quicker so that should be your first option although you can do both.

Exactly. There was no one behind you. Was there someone behind the autoshuttle? We don't know.

russian cyberwarfare specialists gtfo my board reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

See a truck blindly backing up.

1) Drive on the truck driver will clearly magically see me.
2) Change lane, stop, slow, sound horn...

There's not enough of a description of the situation to come to possible solutions like that.

And it's also possible the thing doesn't have a horn because they thought the AI wouldn't need it.

catch exception

That would be illegal top operate in that state then. Need to have a functional horn.

Who do consumerists on this board so readily defend gimmick technologies? Do you people actually believe AI exist?

I was just thinking this, even though more control to "corporations" does make me a bit nervous, it wouldn't be a bad thing to activate a perimeter around certain heavy streets or events that shuts down any vehicle going in a speed/course that can be used to run down large amounts of people

It wouldn't be just about terrorism.

Speeding could be made impossible, making streets much safer.
And if a driver falls asleep or gets a heart attack causing him to drive off the road his vehicle would stop much sooner.

I am a lot more optimistic about these type of advanced driving aids and safety measures than the entire self driving meme itself.

I agree, instead of focusing so much on self-driving vehicles we should be making our already existing cars more safe using this type of technology.

There were other cars behind it.

Does that apply when there is no driver though?

sicario. the mexican gangs can afford to pay for a wall.

If all cars were selfdriving this wouldn't have happened.

A world where all cars are self driving is a world I don't want to live in

>jokes on you I was only pretending to be retarded

Skynet when?

this is like the one thing it should be good at, parsing numerous options to find the best solution very quickly, rather than acting like a human and going deer in the headlights when a truck reverses towards it.

however this seems like a programming oversight

Do the cranes have to watch for as much shit? Doubt you could put those cranes in the middle of a city.

...

Women drivers, am I right?

Whatever Bob that was just a simulator.

Appropriate headline: retard semi-truck driver carries on with life of failure and backs into his eventual replacement.

I purchased a used car. I got distracted. Forgot to pull out the wing mirror. Started to backup and my brother who gave me a light to pick it up starts honking at me. Look behind me and see nothing. Bang! Hit a lamp post in my blind spot.

Easily done.

>((((((smart)))))))) car doesn't know about blind spots
Fucking hell. Hate to know what these self driving death mobiles would do when put in a country that isn't perfect road conditions 24/7.