Wikipedia is still banned in Turkey

Wikipedia is still banned in Turkey.

Other urls found in this thread:

tr.0wikipedia.org/wiki/Mustafa_Kemal_Atatürk
ipfs.io/blog/24-uncensorable-wikipedia/
ipfs.io/ipfs/QmT5NvUtoM5nWFfrQdVrFtvGfKFmG7AHE8P34isapyhCxX/wiki/Anasayfa.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rashidun_Caliphate
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shura
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

That's what you get for electing kebab Smygol for president.

i kek'd

Enjoy ur totalitarian regime, fa.m

Turkey is in a pretty sad state, you guys went from one of the few sandnigger countries who looked western to literally muslim dictatorship.

At least you guys got anzu.

>t. """"""americuck""""""
i kek'd

Tell Mr. Erdogan that the truth doesn't fear investigation.

not even in places like Saudi Arabia it's not banned lmfao

mr. assange this is not ur usual board

the mall of america for terrorists

WE WILL GIVE WIKIPEDIA BACK WHEN YOU STOP RUINING ONLINE GAMES FUCKING COCKROACHES

cute boy

Thats just the normal mall of america though. The imported Somalians fucking love that place.

don't know what tech they use to block, but have you tried tor, vpn or there's even add-ons for ffox that'll mask ur ip

>those hands
Holy shit I had never noticed how manly they look.
I'm fully convinced Anzu is a boy now.

I want to do lewds to Anzu senpai

Exactly this.
Fix your shitty ping and speak fucking english instead of your gibberish shit.

I could lick her ass any day.

they are using ip filtering.

here have some wikipedia

>her

ayyyyy

I think there are still torrents for an offline version available

tor and most vpn's are banned too

You could rent a VPS in another country and install your own VPN there
Or is stuff like this monitored too?

it probably isnt but im too dumb for that

There are a lot of good tutorials, it's really just a few command in the command line
They're also outside of YouTube if that's banned in turkey too again

what are roaches to make of knowledge, anyway?

...

Just put 0 before wikipedia.
As in tr.0wikipedia.org/wiki/Mustafa_Kemal_Atatürk

Her boipucci is not for lewds.
You need to marry that boy first.

Turkish people are literal cancer

ipfs.io/blog/24-uncensorable-wikipedia/
ipfs.io/ipfs/QmT5NvUtoM5nWFfrQdVrFtvGfKFmG7AHE8P34isapyhCxX/wiki/Anasayfa.html

I want to cuddle with anzu

Well you have Arabs who favor money and Arabs who favor their religion+culture.
Those who favor money would never cut themselves off from the civilized world in fear of becoming irrelevant.

It's almost like electing an insane mudslime dictator was a bad move.

>t*rks

islam and democracy can't coexist, it's like fascism and democracy or communism and democracy
enjoy erdogan for the rest of your life

turks aren't Arabs you fucking retard

This, they are worse

with anything less than full clown mode war paint this awful roach is plain at best

>democracy
>ie the tyranny of the largest voting minority
>ie the hiveminding group mattering more than anything else
>democracy
>not fascist
wew

You will get it back once you release bannerlord fucking roaches

You could also say the same to the asshole theocratic conservatives in america who basically want a christian version of islam laws.

>christian version of islam laws
you have zero idea what you're talking about, I live in an islamic country (too bad no flags here), and I say to you comparing Christianity to Islam is like comparing flu to brain cancer

this

I'm not comparing the 2 religions I'm saying there are people here in america that want to run shit like a christian theocracy which would be their version of it which obviously would have some differences but they are still both theocracies.

Good, wikipedia is nothing but propaganda

You're a retard. The reason why Christianity and Democracy "coexist" in the west is because Christianity is dead and we're smart enough to ignore all of the stupid shit in it.

We'd be fucked too if we took Christianity as seriously as you camelfuckers take Islam.

And nothing of value was lost.
Unless you needed general information on something Wikipedia info is unreliable at best.

you forgot to mention the most important point which is: Jesus didn't give a fuck about politics, he was a moral autist and his teachings have nothing to do about controlling societies on a nano scale like Mohammed did. Mohammed was a political figure more than a religious figure

Wikipedia's Info is good on getting info where to get info - if the article has sources

>if the article has sources
>click link
>404
>click another source
>its behind a pay wall
>have to dig through web archive to find the link
>or sci-hub the thing directly
>either way you didn't get shit from wikipedia
makes you think.

>democracy
stay asleep goy

is that why the first and best Islamic caliphate was a democracy?

what?

Here's some wikipedia for you. Hope this helps friendo.

>how-to-get-vanned-by-the-erdogan-roach.jpg

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rashidun_Caliphate

"Democracy" insofar as Israel is also a "democracy."

>get someone to download wikipedia and send it to you

>leaders were appointed (aka not elected)
>considered by some to be an early form of Islamic democracy
>after the sunni-shia split, development of islamic democracy halted
Brown people can't seem to get it right, apparently.

yes, they were appointed by the people en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shura
stop speaking rubbish out of your ass like it's fact


brown people aren't Islam racist pol boi, this was a response to how Islam was made to be incompatible like fascism is to democracy which is clearly false.

our glorious leader thinks of everything and has already blocked tor

>shura = by the people
Shura can literally mean anything from discussions in a mosque to choosing the leader of an islamic organisation. It's indirect (representative) democracy, not greek style direct democracy where the leader was chosen by the citizens.

>brown people aren't Islam racist pol boi
The first caliphate clearly was, as it was located on the Arabian peninsula . Stop getting triggered by words.

>this was a response to how Islam was made to be incompatible like fascism is to democracy which is clearly false.
It depends on how you define democracy. Sure, if you define it as "mob rules" then sure. If you define it as western democracy, then clearly not, as islam does not allow religious freedom and demands that laws derive directly from sharia.

Wikipedia is shit for anything remotely political/historical. Far left SJWs run that site

I cannot read these links.

> the richest and strongest people in the community convene to choose one to rule them

> democracy