Tell me again why you're suppporting Pajeet Pai on NN

Tell me again why you're suppporting Pajeet Pai on NN.

Other urls found in this thread:

static.techspot.com/news/71865-congressmen-demand-investigation-fcc-chairman-ajit-pai-sinclair.html
abcnews.go.com/Technology/fcc-stonewalling-probe-massive-scheme-involving-fake-net/story?id=51332865
apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-347927A1.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Because ending it only affects negatively google/amazon/facebook/netflix/etc all those services hogging bandwidth with worthless media

I don't give a fuck if some normalfag ends up having to pay extra to see 4K game of thrones on netflix

Why should my small data center that only hosts HTML pages pay the same price for bandwidth as the rendering farm next door.

I want to see liberal tears. It will be 2016 all over again.

I'm mentally handicapped and Indian, Sir.

>cutting off your dick to spite your taint

No more normalfags and niggers

It gives me comfort that there is never an actual reasonable argument made in defense of pAjit.

Back to Sup Forums with you, your shit is tiresome.
Your outright refusal to be educated is your problem,not mine.

t. reddit intellectual elite

>"I don't care if Trump does a hot liquid shit in my mouth, as long as lubruls get to smell it, I win"

static.techspot.com/news/71865-congressmen-demand-investigation-fcc-chairman-ajit-pai-sinclair.html
*INHALES*

I want him to fuck my wife.

Sup Forums told me google and facebook would be destroyed in a single night once we gave them full power over us.
Sup Forums is always right and we will destroy the jews for sure! MAGA.

>i'm selfish

Jews, shitlibs, google, twitter, facebook, and netflix don't like it

...

what do your html pages have on them?

>google, twitter, facebook, and netflix
because when people have to pay even more to use their product they will lose business user. why is this hard for you to understand?

Because I'm not too stupid to read the entire repeal.

>google, twitter, facebook, netflix, amazon will lose business
good.

>when too much of a brainlet to understand NN and you just learned photoshop last week in your high school design class

because i hate america and only you will be the ones wholl get the short end of the stick in this deal.

Mfw conservatives really are this stupid

>Plebbit says Net Jewtrality is important, so it must me!

What! Ending it helps large players and hurts new players

Oh but I do, as all non-americans should.

>babbys first me-me
weak image

CSS

>(((Webpage))) said NN is important so i must hate it because of keks!
Both ends of the spectrum are just as autistic.

It's not even a partisan issue. The big media and cable companies turned it into one so half the country would blindly support them.

>Trump worshipers hate Jews
>Jews run the big media companies
>Removing NN benefits the big media companies and ISPs
>Trump cucks want to line the Jew pockets??????

Wow is everyone's minds blown yet

Your salty tears are delicious :^)

It's not tear. Just pity.

...

Google: *puts the content of people they disagree with in a limited state*
Twitter: *turns verification ticks into political endorsement then no platforms everyone they disagree with*
Facebook: *shadowbans users for posting opinions they don't agree with*
Net neutrality: *let's this happen*
Pajit: Hey net neutrality is allowing the political censorship of certain individuals and restricting free speech as a result.
Google, Twitter, and Facebook: SHUT THE FUCK UP GOYIM STOP RUINING FREE SPEECH AND TURNING THE INTERNET INTO CABLE
America: YEAH WHAT THEY SAID

Anyone who supports net neutrality is a fucking moron lol

abcnews.go.com/Technology/fcc-stonewalling-probe-massive-scheme-involving-fake-net/story?id=51332865
It's bedtime, Pajeet.

t. samefag

An ISP isn't allowed to block a website due to net neutrality.

Comcast could legally block sites that criticize them or content that has different political views without NN.

Wait a minute, is that.? Malaysian Mike?

>Comcast could legally block sites that criticize them or content that has different political views without NN.
Source?
Were there any examples of this before 2015 when the current NN rules were put into place?

google, twitter, godaddy, facebook are already shutting down people that have different political views. right now, WITH NN

we can have NN when it applies to websites as well.

Uhhhh Reddit said it was going to happen. They didn't say what to do if someone questions it.

>Pajit: Hey net neutrality is allowing the political censorship of certain individuals and restricting free speech as a result.
When has he ever said anything like this as justification for deregulating net neutrality?

B-B-BUT WHAT ABOUT GOOGLE AND FACEBOOK? C-KEK!

t. Moron who didn't read the proposed repeal

...

>it will kill Google and other meanies that are censoring everything
At least with NN you can avoid these shitty companies, without it your fucked if your local isp doesn't like some sites opinion.

You can always choose to use a different social media platform if you don't like how they operate. Isps are different and should have no say in what people view

Why delay the inevitable?
I want to watch it all burn to the ground so that hopefully whatever grows out of our compost of dogshit we call society is better than what made it.

Fake news and racist sites aren't political views user

because it’s 2017
and I’m not a racist
sorry white Sup Forumsuys

Must be a pain in the ass to read your computer screen behind that V for Vendetta mask you dumb shit

Because I want to destroy the American monopoly on the internet.

You might remember AT&T blocking Sup Forums entirely to its users in 2014 if you weren't a fucking newfag.

Because the Reddit hivemind pisses me off

you know, I heard there are a whole bunch of Reddit users all in on this new trend called "not sticking forks in their electrical sockets"
you should do the opposite, I bet that'd really leave an impression on those sheeple

Because I want to live in a world where the internet looks like AOL circa 1992

>I cannot critically think for myself
>I must automatically dislike what my political and social opponents like
>Even if something benefits me, I will fight against it and suffer as a result just to spite people I don't like

Where did your mother go wrong with you?

The same tears your mother let when she realized you were such a retarded nigger

That hypertension from all the salt is fucking up a blood vessel in your brain bud

Because giving the gov't control of the Internet is pretty fucking stupid, given the fact that they are mostly beholden to corporate interest groups (minus Rand Paul and Justin Amash) and have used things that sound nice on paper to further destroy a fundamental right/destroy an industry (see the Patriot Act or the censorship of TV and radio). Also, most of the NN supporters are fine with Twitter throttling users with distasteful views and don't care about thyat at all, so there's that.

*don't care about that at all

1. The government doesn't control the Internet. They are ensuring it remains neutral.

2. You are bitching about governments being beholden to corporations despite repealing NN literally giving keys to the ISP corporations

3. A website banning dissenting viewpoints is not at all comparable to an ISP throttling dissenting viewpoints.

>They are ensuring it remains neutral
Good fucking goy.

yeah and the government is surveilling YOU, it's just protecting you from terrorists
I'd rather ISPs have the keys to the internet (as they did already for many many years) rather than Google, Facebook and the US government that the majority of retards in the US vote for
Ofcourse it fucking is the same
Both are despicable, and shouldn't happen, ofcourse

i agree with
now is the time to drive normies away from Sup Forums. ironic shitposting or not, it makes Sup Forums less appealing to normies.

Free market is good for everyone. The companies who cater to what people want the most will make the most money. cencorship wont sell. If Google, twitter, facebook, etc want NN that should be enough to tell you that something is wrong.

ebin

Because I don't want to subsidize neckbeards who torrent anime porn 24 hours a day.

The Pol infestation of this board is disgusting

>people with opposing opinions to mine make me mad

yep.

>Free market
>With a company that owns 99% of the infrastructure
Corporate shills really got into you.

>You can have a free market in a oligopoly

Go back to Sup Forums, or at least back to high school economics

See I don't want to subsidize poorfags. There are better place to spend taxes instead giving it to poorfags.

...

it pisses off redditors so it must be good.

That's a reasonable argument against NN. And it would filter most of Sup Forums trash. So I'm having second thoughts about this one.

maybe go back to plebit then?

>How could there be a free market for cars!? It's an oligopoly!!

There are 48 ISPs in the USA. Can you name more than 15 car manufacturers without googling it?

1. You can literally do the same shit by lowering the barriers of entry to the Internet market and getting rid of these 60+ year old telecomm local monopolies that have been in place for a while now in some parts of the country, without the possibility of the gov't inserting shady shit into a bill that allows for a larger surveillance state , not to mention the fact that the gov't would take longer to look into the prospect, set up Congressional meetings about it for a while and finally set up a vote to implement it and then come up with a plan to roll it out than it would take to just allow more competition in the areas that do suffer from a general lack of it and allow startups to be created.

2. It's a tad bit stupid to trust people whose livelihoods come from the very same people you think you are against with something you find very important like Net Neutrality, isn't it?

OMG the ISPs are going to charge me to watch HD porn?

Oh, they're not saying that? They just don't think it's fair that Netflix is 1080p streaming to millions of people over their network for the same cost as Mom & Pop's corner store website?

>48 ISP
ISP =/= infrastructure provider

So then why do they have datacaps?

But wait... how do those companies stay afloat then if one company owns 99% of the infrastructure? How is it an oligopoly if it should be a monopoly? hmmm.

It's a V for VR helmet.

It's gonna get repealed anyway and there's nothing anyone can do about it. Might as well get used to it.

...

Because they lease it? How the fuck a landlord makes money?

ahhhh. It's almost like... that's how businesses work or something. It's kinda like... A FREE FUCKING MARKET.

In this case, the market will never be free as long as the party who owns the infrastructure also provides communication services in it, because, as long as the competition operates on their network, they will always find a way to undermine the competition.

I don't normally use this word, but you're a cuck.

where can i read the repeal? google give me links to pages taking about it only.

apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-347927A1.pdf

Its just Sup Forums being anti-reddit again. If reddit said eating dog shit is bad for you Sup Forums would be like
>"FUCKING PLEBBUT DOG SHIT FTW I WILL STUFF DOG SHIT IN MY MOUTH JUST TO BTFO REDDIT"

You aren't paying for bandwidth, you are paying for networking speed.

>Being deliberately obtuse

Not even from the USA are you?

So why aren't barriers to entry being removed first? If the goal was to ensure competitive isp service, wouldn't it be logical to maintain consumer protection while slowly promoting more competition?

What an insightful and constructive opionion
has. I sure do love the nuance and understanding you faggots bring to tech discussions.

Unironically this.

>WE NEED NET NEUTRALITY FOR A NEUTRAL CENSORSHIP-FREE INTERNET
>*bans daily stormer*
>*bans conservative websites*
>*demonetizes conservative videos*
>*bans conservative twitter/fb accounts*
>*bans Russia IP from twitter because muh russia hackers*
>IF YOU DONT SUPPORT NET NEUTRALITY OUR BELOVED 4CHINZ WILL BE BANNED WAAHH WAAHH

Pre-2015 (NN) Sup Forums was a better time. Why the fuck should I want Net """""""""""Neutrality""""""""""" when it has proven itself to be NOT neutral?

I would rather suck a pajeet's tiny tikka masala than Google/Twitter/Youtube's fat jewish cocks.