I guess net neutrality is over

I guess net neutrality is over.

It had a good run.

Thanks, Obama!

fee.org/articles/goodbye-net-neutrality-hello-competition/?utm_source=zapier

Other urls found in this thread:

web.archive.org/web/20171125061210/https://fee.org/articles/goodbye-net-neutrality-hello-competition/?utm_source=zapier
youtube.com/watch?v=vfbqp14hhU0
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

that site keeps loading in ads really late and repeatedly

> not having an adblocker
> 2017

your reddit side is showing

d r o p p e d

I ain't clicking that link faggot. Post a recap or archive link or gtfo

Just click on block, you faggot.

>article written by a jew
The more I learn about this NN shit the less I want it.

>2 days ago
stopped reading there

you don't want it repealed because this jew wants to repeal it?

Jews control the whole america, the past, the present and the future government. Looking for and finding a jew is not a hard task.

web.archive.org/web/20171125061210/https://fee.org/articles/goodbye-net-neutrality-hello-competition/?utm_source=zapier

Is Trump really Jewish? But Sup Forums supports him and they usually hate Jews.

i dont give a shit im not amerifat

Sup Forums is cognitive dissonance: the board. The jews are playing double game with the young men at Sup Forums but who cares these days.
youtube.com/watch?v=vfbqp14hhU0

>net neutrality protects against censorship
>The only instances of widespread political censorship in US internet history started after net neutrality became law

Just remember to ask this question:

"How does the repeal of Net Neutrality benefit me?"

Common deflections:
>ISPs aren't getting paid!
That's the ISPs problem, not yours. They already took taxpayer money for doing an half-assed job in building infrastructure they were contracted to build
>NN cost tax money!
Its already legislation, there's no additional tax dollars used, ironically it is used everytime an attempt at repeal occurs
>Jewgle!Kikeflex!
The consumer isn't forced to use either of these sites, or any 'big' sites, yet they will be forced (depending on location) to use a choice of 2 shitty ISPs
>'CENSORSHIP!'
If you're thinking about daily stormer, than that was the host screwing them over. You can go and create however many sites for your specific ideas/politics/fetishes you want, provided you have the $. But that will be threatened if NN is repealed, comcast themselves sneakily put in 'lawful' sites being allowed. They will happily label the far-right (since they own MSNBC) as unlawful.
>'No problems pre-2015!'
Then there should be no problem keeping NN, because all it is the same set of laws before 2015. Only officially legislated so FCC doesn't have to constantly tell ISPs they're overstepping their boundaries.

T-Mobile charges an extra $10 a month for HD streaming of video if you have their T-Mobile ONE plan
They call it T-Mobile ONE Plus
Net Neutrality doesn't even do what it's (supposedly) designed for

You lads think that maybe you should look into why Jewgle, Reddit, and Kikeflix are spending hundreds of millions shilling for shit Obama passed?

that entire forst paragraph is the stupidest thing i have ever read due to the fact there is a long standing law that prevents any kind of competition and allows certa8n isps to monopolize areas via regulation you either completely deregulate or removing NN is horrible for consumers it leaves them stuck with a plan they will hate with no where else to take their buisiness too and i l9ke thr m9del of pay one flat fee and get one speed with unlimited data that i can go anywhere i want with without stupid pop ups

>ISPs aren't getting paid
It is our problem since the burden is now the consumer's.

That's because of their deals with the content providers. You clearly didn't read the Net Neutrality provisions entitled "reasonable network management". Got a problem? Sue them. But of course you wouldn't, Koch Brother, because you're just as bad as the paid oppo from 2016.

You have a contract with them, if they overcharge you can report them

Then maybe the people should consider the ramifications on the people rather than the ludicrous profits every ISP rakes in and doesn't upgrade the infrastructure they're being paid to upgrade

>Koch Brother
>paid oppo from 2016.
Hey Young Turks, how many Jewish nigger dicks do you think Clinton sucked to get those donations from the top 1%

>yea your contract is over, sign this new one
>wow wtf this is way overpriced
>so what, go without internet or pay us

No you dumbass, they literally aren't allowed to do that unless you bend over like the bitch you are. Fight for it or don't cry

>When I open my business, I'll charge a million dollars and get rich
Ayy, Bernie Bros are smart and shit, not even children.

Then the original argument that "if you're being overcharged" is completely baseless because they aren't arbitrarily overcharging you outside the contract.

Because some 75% of comcast customers don't have access to another internet source many times they are being charged ludicrous amounts for what is effectively yester-decade internet service

Checked. And yeah this is something none if the NN shills ever mention and that's the fact that companies like t-mobile have already been finding legal loopholes around NN that allow them to create data packages where certain sites are given priority over others. The bigger issue is that we need to stop fighting over NN because it is a distraction from the real problem which is that these ISPs should not be allowed to be anything more than dumb pipes. Why is it legal for Comcast to own NBC? To my knowledge my electricity provider is not allowed to own lightbulb companies or electronic appliance companies. I could be wrong on that though and would not be shocked if they do have conflicts of interest. BUT what I'm saying though is that all of this reddit-energy is being wasted on NN when the bigger issue is anti-trust violations and lack of consumer choices for high-speed ISPs(which is due to excessive government regulations). The only real solution I see is to repeal the 19th amendment so that men can start voting for small government and so that we can have a real free market where competition will provide better choices for consumers, including the female and soyboy consumers who are hellbent on turning America into a socialist shithole where the nanny state removes all choices.

>now they we've let people fuck you in the ass, you get to pick the shortest dick, be happy about it!
WWIII when? Dying in some god-forsaken desolate country sounds better than surviving this horseshit.

When you have no choice, you pay for the monopoly price or go without

Some places cable companies already have a monopoly.

i agree with thos isps should only be allowed to be isps and nothing else

This, many times major ISP's have non-compete clauses between them or will get exclusivity contracts on cities or towns or large swathes of area for telephone pole rights. This pretty much means that major ISP's rarely compete and if they wanted to (they don't) they can get cockblocked by being unable to provide service to an area because they aren't allowed to. So because of this you often times only get 1 choice of ISP. No other Comcast subsidy ISP's are not fucking competition, you can't say "I hate acura so I bought a honda" they're the same fucking companies and you aren't actually getting any competition.

>The only real solution I see is to repeal the 19th amendment so that men can start voting for small government and so that we can have a real free market where competition will provide better choices for consumers, including the female and soyboy consumers who are hellbent on turning America into a socialist shithole where the nanny state removes all choices.
You are fucking retarded, how is taking away people's right to vote going to fix anything?

thats what im saying you moron

What's the schizophrenic garbage?

reddit meme seems to be worse than actual redditors in most cases lmao currentstate amirite?

Your numlock is on fag

This is blatant shilling at its finest.
1) Data streaming on MOBILE is different to landlines
2) the plan is inclusive of ALL types of videos, it can be 1080 porn, or yt. They can't slow down dailymotion in favor of YT, at least not as long as we have NN

im on a phone retard the fucking keys are too small

...

I highly doubt you know what you are talking about either.

>when you fall for propaganda espoused by fox news and the technologically illiterate elite who have only their interests in mind
>when assuming that people of a typically different point of view than your own are unqualified makes you feel better about yourself
>when you're such a brainlet you've been convinced that super corporations have the interest of the "free market" in mind and not purely profit at almost any cost
wew

do you actually think an isp cant block certain traffic?

>when you're convinced that it's not big corp A vs big corp B
Look son, how this world works is if there's an issue that big corps all agree on, you don't hear about it at all. The only reason anyone knows about this is because it's a big corp fight and the public are being coopted onto one side or the other as if this is a meaningful fight.
No matter what happens, the amount of money you spend is going up.
If ISPs win, they charge the netflixes and such more, and so netflix puts up their pricfes.
If Netflix etc win, ISPs put up their prices.

IT'S LOSE-LOSE

now you are being extra retarded

You don't understand american NN.
This isn't about net neutrality, this is about big corp interests rallying around a talking point.

>he wants to keep women's suffrage
>he wants women to suffer
>>>r/mgtow

do you know what a monopoly is? also, are you retarded?

and if the isps win ill have to pay 300 fucking dollars a month just to keep the same unlimited unrestricted service i have now or suffer with having to find something else to do at the end of the month but the problem is there isn't anything to do around here its have thing to do at home or go out to bars and get drunk but all the bars are filled with assholes who get on your case just to pick fights and i dont drink

Underrated post.

You break monopolies with the guillotine, not with paper.

Invest in a gun instead, and start murdering ISP execs for their greed.

murdering people isnt not going to change anything other than my status as a non imprisoned person jason

Really makes you think

NN is implicit on a free market of ISPs.

But you don't have a free market of ISPs and removing the hardcoded NN won't make it happen, so enjoy the ride to hell.

Sure thing, royalist.

Its not even subtle at this point

>royalist
>imlying shooting an isp exec wont get me thrown in prison

i haven't been browsing for 5 days, what's Sup Forums's general consensus on NN?
Both outcomes are terrible but I'm personally against it.
no, but he has been ZOGed.

How do you feel about torrenting since NN is on? oh wow, such neutral internet

The internet in USA before NN was way better, Obama created a fake concern about ISPs that didn't existed before, all the issues about ISPs being douchebags were dealt without NN. Seriously, NN is a law made by (((someone))) that wants to have free access to the broadband, and regulate content from their big companies.

How does NN hurt the consumer? Name one example, one single sentence from the law itself that hurts the consumer.

my thoughts exactly.
besides, even if ISPs do this, it's easier to boycot ISP than to boycot a govt.
i just wondered if anyone on this board thought the same.

it hurts us because NN will be an accelerator to more centralized web.
it isn't about consumers, it's about whether Facebook, Google and others need to pay more.
this isn't about the consumers in the slightest.

>N-NO U
l o l

>centralized web
lmao so no actual argument

no one not a single person can tell me what the fuck im supposed to do if i have to limit my intermet use what else am i suppsoed to do with my time?

It's impossible to speak to a deaf.

There are more people like us, I've seen a couple of discussions and they're not so far from that opinion. Remember that the government is the only real monopoly, and when ISPs have privilegies, that's because they're on some deal with the government that put them on that status.

>easier to boycott an isp

and just have no internet at all?

>that's because they're on some deal with the government that put them on that status.
So your retarded ass don't even know the history behind it. Please for the last bit of integrity of this board, just kill yourself

>go inform yourself
Not even an argument.

You realize he's actually catholic right

Formerly a Southern Baptist, Tucker is a convert[24] to traditionalist Catholicism

Fucking retard

that's major bullshit.
i live in a village in Bosnia and Herzegovina with 200 people in it, and we still have two options from ISPs.
besides, even if we had one ISP only and it did shit like that, everyone would just cancel their internets.
USA sure has it better.

There's so much retarded shit in this post I can't even start

You would think a board of supposed engineers wouldn't be fucking morons

If you post anti Israel (not even auti Jew) shit in /r/the_donald, you get banned in under a minute

So if you have one ISP available are you just going to not have internet?

It's actually sad to see all these obvious shills. You know, often it's hard to tell, like with the Windows 10 shills. There's a significant number of people that actually use Windows 10, so it's hard to tell apart the shills and the real people. Or maybe there are no shills to begin with? Who knows.
But in this thread and the other Net Neutrality threads, it's painfully obvious that y'all are getting paid by Verizon. Because there is no way in hell that ANYBODY on Sup Forums would want to repel Net Neutrality. It just makes NO sense whatsover, you shills should go on Facebook or 9gag instead, where people might actually fall for it.

This.

What faggots think net neutrality is: The first amendment being applied to private corporations

What it actually is: Distributing costs among all customers instead of charging netflix for all the bandwidth they sap up and not being allowed to throttle netflix during peak hours so non-fucktards can actually use the service they're paying for

Don't get caught?

>USA sure has it better.
it doesn't.
Fun fact: in the US state Virginia, you can only buy hard liquors from a state controlled liquor store called ABC Virginia. And of course pubs and night clubs. Normal stores (grocery stores, etc.) are not allowed to sell hard liquors.
This is the kind of country the USA is, and yes, each city typically only has one or two ISPs available.

You have problems using Netflix? Sorry to hear you have such a shitty ISP.

Also, let us not forget that it was Virginia that elected a degenerate tranny as a lawmaker.

I wish someone behead the fucking Pajeet already

I have problems because peak traffic always involves a handful of sites that don't pay their fair share.

Or it means your ISP is so shitty that they refuse to upgrade their fiber optics cables.

Maybe they'd be able to afford it if net neutrality went byebye.

or if they, you know, raised their prices. like any company would do in that situation, rather than trying to force the government to pass a new law

Or maybe they should stop keeping money for themselves since they make more than enough and actually use it to better their shitty service.

Why should I have to pay for something caused by netflix and its users?

Oh right, because it's "fair" according to you bleeding heart idiots. And because hipster fucks think net neutrality means twitter can't ban them for saying "heil hitler".

Communism for me not for thee, free shit for everyone, except you BIGOT

The cost to lay new cable ranges from the high six figures to the sevens. Maybe five figures for very small amounts of work.

You want netflix you get charged for netflix. I don't.

I won't pay for your netflix, city boy.

>Why should I have to pay for something caused by netflix and its users?
People are free to use the Internet however they see fit. What if I download 3TB worth of HD porn? It's basically the same thing. You signed up for it when you bought your data plan. Don't like it? Don't use the Internet
>because hipster fucks think net neutrality means twitter can't ban them for saying "heil hitler".
Well you are on Sup Forums right now, and you just said heil hitler. So aren't you the hipster fuck?

You have to spend money to make money, you filthy Jew.

How about "you want N gigabytes of data, you pay for N gigabytes of data" irrespective of whether that data comes from Netflix or some other site?

..But netflix have cacheing servers that they deploy to ISP data centers through reciprocal agreements. Nearly all of the traffic when you're watching netflix just comes from your ISP data centre, and doesn't touch the network backbone at all.

Note that this is totally legal under NN, and entirely beneficial - It's dubious that they'd throttle without NN, because they already have something that outperforms the public backbone by a big margin, and wouldn't be further improved by throttling..

..But N Gb from netflix just comes from the ISP data centre, while N Gb from the other side of the world can end up going over 10 backbone links, controlled by reciprocal agreements.

I'd expect there to be natural advantages to getting content from nearby, but that wouldn't happen with a flat $/Gb rate.

>government control is freedom
Retarded statists.

N gigabytes from Netflix comes from Netflix's data centers, not from the ISP's data centers. Most large scale websites tend to have data centers in multiple locations around the world to ensure data doesn't have to travel too great a distance. Location is a non-problem.