Why don't we have mechanical computers in 2017? We can build cogs at 10nm, no?

Why don't we have mechanical computers in 2017? We can build cogs at 10nm, no?

Other urls found in this thread:

mems-exchange.org/MEMS/what-is.html
youtube.com/watch?v=oSCX78-8-q0
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_molecular_motor
twitter.com/AnonBabble

You just learned those words and want them to be babies first post on Sup Forums, right?

But in case this is not ironic, mems-exchange.org/MEMS/what-is.html

Nah, I'm really curious why nobody develops that technology given how much we can shrink hardware elements.

10nm moving parts would be painful to assemble.

That's it?
Build a small robot to do that or use atom needle.

lithography requires no assembly, you basically build the components one layer at a time, then dissolve the shit you don't want and you have the moving parts you wanted, the linked article above talks about motors by the micrometer, but i have no idea what the state of the art tech can do

Also, IBM claims this movie was made by moving individual atos, so 10nm is definitely doable.
youtube.com/watch?v=oSCX78-8-q0

Mechanical parts fail quicker. What are you going to lubricate it with?

I bet they will brake down faster than you can say start.

Can't they be made from carbon atoms? You sure parts made from a couple of hundreds atoms would break easily?

who cares how fast it fails. no one would do it for functional purposes, they'd just do it because they can and why not

for you

...

Because moving parts break.

because its a shit idea. gears fucking suck. If I could replace the transmission in my car with some transistors you can fucking bet Id do it.

>I don't know what friction is
>I don't into power consumption
>What is cooling?
>lmao small wheels lol

no

Sad

For you.

its sad that I dont want my transmissions to fall apart every 150,000 miles?
they break like clockwork.

why don't you do it then, faggot?

people dont usually do useless shit because no one has time for that

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_molecular_motor

Dumb question.
Smart question is why do we not have computers made of water in 2017?

Nanomechanics is continually researched but is currently cost prohibitive for most practical things, modern ICs have nanoscale features thanks to lithography, good luck etching a cog on a substrate

Holy shit thats cool

I knew it was coming somehow but I'm not disappointed.

You need some type of meme like a microassembler

Fluidics, including fluid logics, was a big deal back in the '60s. Very robust, vibration/shock/radiation-proof. Most logic functions (AND, OR, NAND, NOR, bistables etc) could be implemented.
Very suited for industrial controls.
The fluid didn't have to be water. I saw some demonstration setups that used gas/air.
Can't remember

how would water put things on my screen or use hardrive???